Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gender, Race, and Mentorship: A Perspective from California Archaeology

Brown, Kaitlin M.·2018·California Archaeology

Abstract

This article explores the role of mentorship in structuring students’ decisions to pursue career paths in archaeology, both within and outside academia. Based on recent survey data administered to the Society for California Archaeology membership, I consider the demographic makeup of mentors and mentees, a diachronic analysis of mentor and mentee relationships, quantitative and qualitative responses to individual experiences with mentors, and the ways in which gender and race/ethnicity play out in the context of these relationships over time. Results indicate that greater disparities exist in mentoring relationships involving women and racial/ethnic minorities—disparities that have persisted since the founding of North American archaeology and continue to the present day. The cause for these disjunctions may originate from a lack of diversity in potential mentors within academia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1947461x.2018.1535814

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women and BIPOC graduate students have been underserved by their advisors and mentors.

    “and women and BIPOC graduate students have been underserved by their advisors and mentors (Brown 2018).”

    From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Brown 2018

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1353/aiq.2006.0015 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.7183/0002-7316.79.3.522 · DOI
  3. Bardolph Dana N., 2018, California Archaeology, 10
  4. 10.1080/0734578X.2015.1113101 · DOI
  5. Baxter Jane E., 2005, The SAA Archaeological Record, 5, 7
  6. Baxter Jane E., 2008, The SAA Archaeological Record, 8, 15
  7. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01717.x · DOI
  8. Browman David L., 2002, New Perspectives on the Origins of Americanist Archaeology
  9. Burkholder Jo Ellen, 2006, The SAA Archaeological Record, 6, 27
  10. Chester Hilary Lynn, 2002, New Perspectives on the Origins of Americanist Archaeology, 164
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1994.tb00201.x · DOI
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0102172 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Colwell-Chanthaphonh Chip, 2004, Graduate Journal of Social Science, 1, 117
  14. 10.1007/s11759-005-0003-9 · DOI
  15. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/B978-0-12-003107-8.50006-2 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Cordell Linda S., 1993, Hidden Scholars: Women Anthropologists and the Native American Southwest, 202
  18. Cusack Carole M., 1993, Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, 232
  19. 10.2307/280822 · DOI
  20. Dye David, 2014, The SAA Archaeological Record, Special Forum on Mentoring, 14, 17
  21. Garrow Barbara A., 1994, Women in Archaeology, 182
  22. 10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414 · DOI
  23. 10.2307/280492 · DOI
  24. Gero Joan M., 1993, Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, 31
  25. Gero Joan M., 1996, Gender and Archaeology, 251
  26. 10.1080/0067270X.2014.904979 · DOI
  27. Gonzalez Toni, 2018, California Archaeology, 10
  28. 10.1007/s11162-017-9454-2 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1177/000271620057100107 · DOI
  30. Hutson Scott R., 1998, SAA Bulletin, 16, 19
  31. Kahn Shulamit, 1993, The American Economic Review, 83, 52
  32. Meyers Maureen, 2018, Advances in Archaeological Practice, 1
  33. 10.1037/apl0000022 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1007/s10816-007-9033-5 · DOI
  35. Ndlovu Ndukuyakhe, 2009, The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 64, 91
  36. Nelson Sarah M., 2004, Gender in Archaeology: Analyzing Power and Prestige, 10.5040/9798216417941 · DOI
  37. Nelson Margaret C., 1994, Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology
  38. 10.1111/aman.12929 · DOI
  39. Parezo Nancy J., 1993, Hidden Scholars: Women Anthropologists and the Native American Southwest
  40. Radde Hugh D., 2018, California Archaeology, 10
  41. Safi Kristin N., 2014, The SAA Archaeological Record, 14, 15
  42. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085424 · DOI
  43. 10.1017/aaq.2017.36 · DOI
  44. Stark Barbara L., 1997, SAA Bulletin, 15, 6
  45. Surface-Evans Sarah L., 2012, The SAA Archaeological Record, 12, 19
  46. 10.1371/journal.pone.0188403 · DOI
  47. VanDerwarker Amber M, 2018, California Archaeology, 10
  48. 10.2307/3557080 · DOI
  49. Wright Rita P., 2003, Ethical Issues in Archaeology, 225
  50. Wylie Alison, 1983, The Socio-Politics of Archaeology, 119
  51. Zeder Melinda A., 1997, The American Archaeologist: A Profile

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brown, K. M.
Affiliations
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93101-3210
Venue
California Archaeology
Published
2018-07-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
187-209
ISSN
  • 1947-461X
  • 1947-4628
Cited by
13
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review