Cited by 23Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and Programs

The Effects of ALEKS on Mathematics Learning in K-12 and Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis

Sun, Shuyan, Else-Quest, Nicole M., Hodges, Linda C., French, Allison M., Dowling, Rebecca·2021·Investigations in Mathematics Learning

Abstract

As remote learning technologies play an increasingly larger role in education, clear evidence of effectiveness is needed for widely used online learning technologies, such as Assessment and LEarning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS). By adapting to individual students’ knowledge states and personalizing interactive practice and feedback, ALEKS may potentially support learning in mathematics, which is foundational for success in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Given the mixed findings about the effects of ALEKS in previous research, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine if ALEKS was as effective as traditional instruction in mathematics education. Our analysis included 56 independent effect sizes obtained from 9,238 students in K-12 schools and institutions of higher education participating in 33 research studies between 2000 and August 2020. Results indicated that learning performance with ALEKS was comparable to that with traditional instruction (Hedge’s g = 0.05, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.20]) and ALEKS was especially effective when used to supplement traditional instruction (g = 0.43, 95% CI [0.02, 0.83]). These findings have important implications for using ALEKS in mathematics learning across different levels of education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19477503.2021.1926194

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analytic findings suggest that ITS are particularly effective when they are used to supplement human instruction.

    “and meta-analytic findings suggesting that ITS are particularly effective when they are used to supplement human instruction (Sun et al., 2021).”

    From Looking Beyond the Hype: Understanding the Effects of AI on Learning (2025) · cites this paper as Sun et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, S., Else-Quest, N. M., Hodges, L. C., French, A. M., & Dowling, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Sun, Shuyan
Venue
Investigations in Mathematics Learning
Published
2021-06-24
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
182-196
ISSN
  • 1947-7503 (ISSN-L)
  • 2472-7466
OpenAlex
W3177181456
Cited by
23
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Investigations in Mathematics Learning (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (Grant 1661105)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
Keywords
ALEKS, adaptive learning systems, knowledge spaces, mathematics learning, online learning, personalized learning, K-12 education, higher education, conventional instruction comparison, distance education, effect size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review