CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An overview of the latest developments in facial imaging

Stephan, Carl N., Caple, Jodi M., Guyomarc’h, Pierre, Claes, Peter·2019·Forensic Sciences Research
DOI 10.1080/20961790.2018.1519892PMC PMC6427692
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20961790.2018.1519892

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a concerning lack of standardization of required CCTV installation, recording conditions, and image quality.

    “While this global increase in CCTV data is beneficial to criminal investigation and facial comparison, there is a concerning lack of standardization of required installation, recording conditions, and image quality [20,82,89,90,91,92].”

    From Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Face mapping (photo-comparison) section says differences in recording conditions and image resolution are common and complicate forensic comparisons; it also says ideal image-quality and photographic conditions are rarely met. It does not address a lack of standards for CCTV installation requirements specifically. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Most systems are notably still lacking in applicability for facial comparison and are primarily disadvantaged not by installation and recording conditions but by image quality.

    “Most systems are notably still lacking in applicability for facial comparison and are primarily disadvantaged not by installation and recording conditions but by image quality [20,82,89,90,92].”

    From Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Face mapping (photo-comparison) section describes weak validation and practical limits on facial comparisons, supporting the claim that methods have limited applicability. But it identifies both image quality and photographic conditions as important, explicitly calling replication of camera conditions crucial. It does not support the claim that image quality is the primary disadvantage rather than recording conditions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 300

  1. 10.1002/9781118469538.ch13 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/978-1-60761-832-4 · DOI
  3. Taylor KT, 2001, Forensic art and illustration
  4. Clement JG, 1998, Craniofacial identification in forensic medicine
  5. İşcan MY, 1993, Forensic analysis of the skull: craniofacial analysis, reconstruction, and identification
  6. İşcan MY, 2013, The human skeleton in forensic medicine
  7. Valentine T, 2015, Forensic facial identification: theory and practice of identification from eyewitnesses, 10.1002/9781118469538 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/CBO9781139049566 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/00000433-199106000-00009 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/1556-4029.12732 · DOI
  11. Prag J, 1997, Making faces: using forensic and archaeological evidence
  12. Gerasimov MM, 1971, The face finder; translated from the German by Alan Houghton Brodrick
  13. Gerassimow MM, 1968, Ich suchte Gesichter
  14. Taylor KT, 2001, Forensic art and illustration, 361
  15. 10.1520/JFS14993J · DOI
  16. Taylor R, 2005, Computer-graphic facial reconstruction, 33
  17. 10.1520/JFS13223J · DOI
  18. 10.1117/12.48078 · DOI
  19. 10.1097/00000433-198412000-00009 · DOI
  20. 10.1017/CBO9781107340961 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gerasimov MM, 1955, Vosstanovlenie lica po cerepu
  22. 10.1385/FSMP:1:3:173 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s12024-006-0007-9 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01971.x · DOI
  25. Tu P, 2005, Computer-graphic facial reconstruction, 145
  26. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.03.008 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.035 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.08.031 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.10.003 · DOI
  30. 10.1017/CBO9781139049566.017 · DOI
  31. 10.1520/JFS14175J · DOI
  32. Tu PH, 2003, Forensic Sci Int, 136, 168
  33. Subsol G, 2005, Computer-graphic facial reconstruction, 79
  34. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.036 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/1556-4029.12547 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/20961790.2018.1469185 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00175.x · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01672.x · DOI
  39. Ullrich H, 2016, Anthropologie (Brno, 54, 97
  40. Kollmann J, 1898, Archiv Anthropol, 25, 329
  41. Eggeling Hv, 1913, Archiv Anthropol, 12, 44
  42. Wilder HH, 1918, Personal identification: methods for the identification of individuals, living or dead
  43. Krogman WM, 1946, FBI Law Enforcement Bull, 17, 11
  44. Krogman WM, 1962, The human skeleton in forensic medicine
  45. Gerasimov MM, 1949, Osnovy vostanovleniia litsa po cherepo
  46. Montagu MFA, 1947, Technol Rev, 49, 345
  47. 10.2307/1139795 · DOI
  48. Suk V, 1935, Publ Facultae Sci l'Univer Masaryk, 207, 3
  49. 10.1016/0379-0738(89)90200-4 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S0379-0738(99)00026-2 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/S1355-0306(03)71776-6 · DOI
  52. 10.1520/JFS15457J · DOI
  53. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00718.x · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00982.x · DOI
  55. Guyomarc'h P, 2010, Am J Phys Anthropol, 141, 120
  56. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02075.x · DOI
  57. Stephan CN, 2003, J Forensic Sci, 48, 470
  58. Craig EA, 2003, J Forensic Sci, 48, 469, 10.1520/JFS2002319 · DOI
  59. 10.1520/JFS2002053 · DOI
  60. 10.1111/1556-4029.13513 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.02.029 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.01.031 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.023 · DOI
  64. 10.1111/1556-4029.12128 · DOI
  65. Prokopec M, 2002, Forensic Sci Commun, 4
  66. 10.1520/JFS11181J · DOI
  67. 10.1002/ajpa.10300 · DOI
  68. 10.1002/ajpa.20337 · DOI
  69. 10.1007/s12024-009-9124-6 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.039 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.035 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.011 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.052 · DOI
  74. 10.1111/1556-4029.13801 · DOI
  75. 10.1111/1556-4029.13494 · DOI
  76. 10.1111/1556-4029.12920 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.05.004 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.017 · DOI
  79. 10.1002/ajpa.10166 · DOI
  80. 10.1520/JFS2002418 · DOI
  81. Stephan CN, 2008, J Forensic Odonto-Stomatol, 27, 2
  82. 10.1520/JFS2002412 · DOI
  83. 10.1111/1556-4029.13064 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00279-7 · DOI
  85. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02181.x · DOI
  86. Airan M, 2017, J Adv Med Dental Sci Res, 5, 19, 10.5455/jrmds.2017514 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.06.016 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.026 · DOI
  89. 10.1080/00450618.2016.1194471 · DOI
  90. 10.1520/JFS14640J · DOI
  91. 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00453-9 · DOI
  92. 10.1520/JFS15149J · DOI
  93. Sahni D, 2002, Forensic Sci Commun, 4
  94. 10.1002/ajpa.10073 · DOI
  95. Sutisno M, 2003, Human facial soft-tissue thickness and its value in forensic facial reconstruction
  96. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.004 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.034 · DOI
  98. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00009.x · DOI
  99. Niinimaki S, Karttunen A, editors. Finnish facial tissue thickness study. Proceedings of the 22nd Nordic Archaeological Conference, University of Oulu; 2006; Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy.
  100. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00069.x · DOI
  101. 10.1597/04-191 · DOI
  102. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.07.012 · DOI
  103. Suazo GIC, 2008, Int J Morphol, 26, 165
  104. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.11.011 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.002 · DOI
  106. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.06.017 · DOI
  107. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.10.013 · DOI
  108. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.009 · DOI
  109. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01640.x · DOI
  110. 10.1016/j.jchb.2011.06.001 · DOI
  111. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.06.004 · DOI
  112. Guyomarc'h P, 2013, Forensic Sci Int, 231, 411.e1
  113. 10.1111/1556-4029.12766 · DOI
  114. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.02.015 · DOI
  115. 10.5005/jp-journals-10011-1275 · DOI
  116. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.11.017 · DOI
  117. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.05.024 · DOI
  118. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.017 · DOI
  119. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.06.012 · DOI
  120. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.043 · DOI
  121. 10.1111/1556-4029.12799 · DOI
  122. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.04.028 · DOI
  123. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.01.011 · DOI
  124. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.12.012 · DOI
  125. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.032 · DOI
  126. 10.1007/s00414-017-1581-y · DOI
  127. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.014 · DOI
  128. 10.1002/ajpa.23029 · DOI
  129. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.011 · DOI
  130. 10.1007/s00414-014-1113-y · DOI
  131. Stephan CN, 2008, J Forensic Sci, 53, 1257, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00852.x · DOI
  132. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.07.017 · DOI
  133. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.05.027 · DOI
  134. Wilkinson CM, 2002, J Forensic Sci, 47, 459, 10.1520/JFS15286J · DOI
  135. 10.1520/JFS15201J · DOI
  136. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.07.010 · DOI
  137. 10.1590/S2176-94512013000200023 · DOI
  138. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.04.015 · DOI
  139. 10.1080/00450618.2015.1122080 · DOI
  140. 10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.08.005 · DOI
  141. Stephan CN, 2008, J Forensic Sci, 53, 1273, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00853.x · DOI
  142. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.051 · DOI
  143. 10.1111/1556-4029.12252 · DOI
  144. 10.1111/1556-4029.12896 · DOI
  145. 10.1520/JFS2004251 · DOI
  146. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.016 · DOI
  147. 10.1111/1556-4029.12328 · DOI
  148. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.09.016 · DOI
  149. 10.1111/1556-4029.13172 · DOI
  150. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.039 · DOI
  151. Clement JG, 2005, Computer graphic facial reconstruction
  152. 10.5744/fa.2018.0025 · DOI
  153. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.039 · DOI
  154. 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.06.005 · DOI
  155. 10.1016/j.legalmed.2017.06.002 · DOI
  156. 10.1520/JFS2004547 · DOI
  157. 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.10.019 · DOI
  158. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.10.021 · DOI
  159. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004224 · DOI · Paper page
  160. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.02.024 · DOI · Paper page
  161. Frudakis TN, 2008, Molecular photofitting: predicting ancestry and phenotype using DNA
  162. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.01.012 · DOI
  163. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.02.004 · DOI
  164. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  165. Rollo RF, 2018, Forensic Sci Int
  166. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.12.003 · DOI
  167. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.027 · DOI
  168. Stephan CN, 2009, Minerva Medicolegale, 129, 47
  169. 10.1111/1556-4029.13435 · DOI
  170. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.026 · DOI
  171. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00622.x · DOI
  172. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.028 · DOI
  173. 10.1002/ajpa.1330330207 · DOI
  174. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00041 · DOI
  175. 10.1068/p130505 · DOI
  176. 10.1068/p150235 · DOI
  177. Taylor JA, 1998, Craniofacial identification in forensic medicine, 151
  178. 10.1111/1556-4029.12842 · DOI
  179. Stephan CN, 2009, Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology, 304
  180. 10.1017/CBO9781139049566.019 · DOI
  181. 10.1520/JFS14538J · DOI
  182. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00624.x · DOI
  183. 10.1080/00085030.1989.10757432 · DOI
  184. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.043 · DOI
  185. 10.1080/00085030.1989.10757415 · DOI
  186. Jayaprakash PT, 2010, Health Environ J, 1, 65
  187. Helmer RP, 1977, Sectschrift Rectsmedizin, 80, 183
  188. 10.1520/JFS13615J · DOI
  189. 10.1016/0379-0738(95)01742-2 · DOI
  190. Titlbach Z. Beitrage zur bewertung der superprojektionsmethode zur identifizierung unbekannter skelettfunde. Kriminalistik und forensische Wissenschaften. Vol.1. Berlin: German Publisher of Sciences; 1970. p. 179–190. German.
  191. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  192. 10.1111/1556-4029.13353 · DOI · Paper page
  193. Glaister J, 1937, Medico-legal aspects of the Ruxton case
  194. 10.1093/biomet/26.3.1 · DOI
  195. Stadtmüller F, 1932, Dtsch Z Ges Gerichtl Med, 20, 33
  196. Welcker H, 1883, Schiller’s Schädel und Todtenmaske, nebst Mittheilungen über Schädel und Todtenmaske kant’s
  197. Lucae JCG, 1873, Arch Anthropol, 6, 1
  198. Grüner O, 1993, Forensic analysis of the skull, 29
  199. Tandler J, 1909, Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 39, 260
  200. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.008 · DOI

200 of 300 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stephan, C. N., Caple, J. M., Guyomarc’h, P., & Claes, P.
Affiliations
  • Laboratory for Human Craniofacial and Skeletal Identification (HuCS-ID Lab), School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia;
  • Unite Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 5199 De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie (PACEA), Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication (MCC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, France;
  • Department of Electrical Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT)/Processing of Speech and Images (PSI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;
ORCID
Venue
Forensic Sciences Research
Publisher
Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics
Published
2018-10-29
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
10-28
ISSN
  • 2096-1790
  • 2471-1411
DOI
10.1080/20961790.2018.1519892
PMC
PMC6427692
Cited by
57
References
4
Language
en
Funders
NEC Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review