Cited by 115Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutrition and Health in AgingNutrition and Health Studies

Factors Influencing Food Choice for Independently Living Older People—A Systematic Literature Review

Host, Alison, McMahon, Anne-Therese, Walton, Karen, Charlton, Karen·2016·Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

Unyielding, disproportionate growth in the 65 years and older age group has precipitated serious concern about the propensity of health and aged-care services to cope in the very near future. Preservation of health and independence for as long as possible into later life will be necessary to attenuate demand for such services. Maintenance of nutritional status is acknowledged as fundamental for achievement of this aim. Determinants of food choice within this age group need to be identified and better understood to facilitate the development of pertinent strategies for encouraging nutritional intakes supportive of optimal health. A systematic review of the literature consistent with PRISMA guidelines was performed to identify articles investigating influences on food choice among older people. Articles were limited to those published between 1996 and 2014 and to studies conducted within countries where the dominant cultural, political and economic situations were comparable to those in Australia. Twenty-four articles were identified and subjected to qualitative analysis. Several themes were revealed and grouped into three broad domains: (i) changes associated with ageing; (ii) psychosocial aspects; and (iii) personal resources. Food choice among older people is determined by a complex interaction between multiple factors. Findings suggest the need for further investigations involving larger, more demographically diverse samples of participants, with the inclusion of a direct observational component in the study design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21551197.2016.1168760

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Host, A., McMahon, A.-T., Walton, K., & Charlton, K.
Affiliations
University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Host, Alison
Venue
Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics
Published
2016-04-02
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
67-94
ISSN
  • 2155-1197 (ISSN-L)
  • 2155-1200
OpenAlex
W2347191689
Cited by
115
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
food choice, older adults, independent living, nutritional status, aging, psychosocial factors, personal resources, dietary factors, aging in place, healthy aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Diet, Female, Food Preferences, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Socioeconomic Factors, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review