Out of context: the absence of geographic variation in US immigrants' perceptions of discrimination
Open accessAbstract
Immigrants' perceptions of discrimination correlate strongly with various political outcomes, including group consciousness and partisan identity. Here, we examine the hypothesis that immigrants' perceptions of discrimination vary across U.S. localities, as threatened responses by native-born residents may increase perceived discrimination among neighboring immigrants. We also consider the alternative hypothesis that barriers to the expression and detection of discrimination decouple native-born attitudes from immigrants' perceptions about their treatment. We test these claims by analyzing three national surveys of almost 11,000 first-generation Latino, Asian, and Muslim immigrants. The results indicate that immigrants' perceptions of discrimination hardly vary across localities. While anti-immigrant attitudes are known to be geographically clustered, immigrants' perceptions of discrimination prove not to be. This mismatch helps us narrow the potential causes of perceived discrimination, and it suggests the value of further research into perceived discrimination's consequences for immigrants' social and political incorporation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hopkins et al. (2016) found little evidence of spatial clustering in immigrants' individual-level perceived discrimination in the United States, despite native-born individuals' attitudes toward immigrants showing substantial geographic clustering.
“Using data from national surveys, however, the authors find little evidence of spatial clustering in immigrants' individual-level perceived discrimination in the United States, despite the fact that the attitudes of native-born individuals toward immigrants show substantial evidence of such geographic clustering.”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Hopkins et al. 2016
Cites
Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994) · Princeton University Press · doi:10.1515/9781400821211 · Cited by 7,225 · see citing works
The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: A meta-analytic review.
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Postmes, T., & Garcia, A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0035754 · Cited by 1,804 · cited 2× · see citing works
“PD also correlate with a range of other critical outcomes, from physical and mental health (Pascoe and Smart Richman 2009; Dong et al. 2012; Schmitt et al. 2014) to educational outcomes (Benner and Graham 2011),”
BackgroundLaPiere, R. T. (1934) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2570339 · Cited by 1,720 · see citing works
Economic insecurity, prejudicial stereotypes, and public opinion on immigration policy
Burns, P., & Gimpel, J. G. (2000) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2657900 · Cited by 746 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Scholars have also examined whether there is similar variation in whites’ attitudes toward immigrants and their co-ethnics (Hood and Morris 1997; Burns and Gimpel 2000; Oliver and Wong 2003; Campbell, Wong and Citrin 2006; Gay 2006; Lewis and Ramakrishnan 2007; Ha 2010; Hopkins 2010; Ramakrishnan…”
BackgroundNew Destination Dreaming: Immigration, Race, and Legal Status in the Rural American South
Marrow, H. (2011) · doi:10.1515/9780804777520 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Self-citationHajnal, Z. L., & Lee, T. (2011) · doi:10.1515/9781400838776 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Seaton, E. K., & Yip, T. (2009) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9356-x · Cited by 219 · see citing works
How Not to Lie with Statistics: Avoiding Common Mistakes in Quantitative Political Science
King, G. (1986) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111095 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants
Esses, V. M. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-080520-102803 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Self-citationMilitarization fails to enhance police safety or reduce crime but may harm police reputation
Mummolo, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1805161115 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hopkins, D. J., Mummolo, J., Esses, V. M., Kaiser, C. R., Marrow, H. B., & McDermott, M.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Western University (CA)
- University of Washington (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hopkins, Daniel J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Politics, Groups, and Identities
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363-392
- ISSN
- 2156-5503 (ISSN-L)
- 2156-5511
- OpenAlex
- W3125771623
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 11.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Politics Groups and Identities (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Russell Sage Foundation (87-12-01)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- perceived discrimination, immigrants, regional variation, anti-immigrant sentiment, Latino immigrants, Asian immigrants, Muslim immigrants, locality, group consciousness, partisan identity, political incorporation, social integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review