Cited by 219Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyHealth disparities and outcomes

School and Neighborhood Contexts, Perceptions of Racial Discrimination, and Psychological Well-being Among African American Adolescents

Open access
Seaton, Eleanor K., Yip, Tiffany·2009·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

The present study examined contextual influences on the relationship between racial discrimination (individual, cultural, and collective/institutional) and psychological well-being. Two hundred and fifty two African American adolescents (46% male and 54% female, average age = 16) completed measures of racial discrimination, self-esteem, depressive symptoms and life satisfaction. Archival information regarding the racial/ethnic composition of the participants' neighborhoods and schools was used and increased school diversity was linked to increased perceptions of cultural discrimination. Regardless of school and neighborhood diversity, high perceptions of collective/institutional discrimination were linked to lower self-esteem for students in high diversity settings. Further, high levels of collective/institutional discrimination were associated with lower life satisfaction for African American youth in low diversity settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-008-9356-x

Cites

53 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seaton, E. K., & Yip, T.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Fordham University (US)
Corresponding author
Seaton, Eleanor K.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2008-10-24
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
153-163
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W1988571537
Cited by
219
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
15.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Fordham Research Commons (Fordham University) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r24hd050924-06)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24 HD-050924, R01HD055436)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
racial discrimination, African American adolescents, diversity in schools, neighborhood diversity, cultural discrimination, institutional discrimination, self-esteem, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, psychological well-being, contextual factors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Black or African American, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, New England, Personal Satisfaction, Prejudice, Regression Analysis, Residence Characteristics, Self Concept, Students, Urban Population, Multivariate Analysis, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review