Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 111

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the front-end of project management

Edkins, Andrew, Geraldi, Joana, Morris, Peter, Smith, Alan·2013·Engineering Project Organization Journal

Abstract

This paper is a multi-case study exploratory investigation into the earliest stages of projects and their management.We refer to this throughout the paper as the 'front-end'.We provide a definition of this phase of the project life cycle and conduct a literature review of the various topics that would suggest themselves to be apposite to the front-end.This includes governance and strategy; requirements and technology; estimating; risk and value; people and learning and development.Following this review of literature, we set out the approach taken in the empirical study.The context for the study was the UK, although many of the organizations investigated had a global presence and some of their projects were multinational in nature.We detail the research methods, the multi-case study route taken and the nature of the in-depth interviews with senior project management representatives from nine extremely credible organizations experienced in managing projects.Our findings are presented so as to identify the key set of findings determined after multiple passes of the interview details.These findings reflect both what comprises the front-end of projects and what management does in the front-end.Some of this would be expected of project management, but we found aspects of the front-end management that are not within the normal remit of what is considered to be traditional project management.These findings both reinforce the literature and offer new insights, for example, showing the strong influence of the commercial and economic non-project players in leading or influencing the front-end of projects.A considered set of conclusions are presented together with recommendations for further research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21573727.2013.775942

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Kirkpatrick D., 2009, Royal United Services Institute Journal Defence Systems, Summer, 102
  2. Ministry of Technology, 1966, Report of the Steering Group on Development Cost Estimating
  3. Morris P. W.G., 2011, Project Perspectives, 33, 4
  4. Office of Government Commerce (OGC), 2007, Review 4: Readiness for Service, OGC Gateway Process
  5. Project Management Institute (PMI), 2013, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)

Cited by

See all 111

Metadata

Authors
Edkins, A., Geraldi, J., Morris, P., & Smith, A.
Venue
Engineering Project Organization Journal
Published
2013-04-03
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
71-85
ISSN
  • 2157-3727
  • 2157-3735
Cited by
111
References
62
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the front-end of project management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21573727.2013.775942
The paper
Edkins, A., Geraldi, J., Morris, P., & Smith, A. (2013). Exploring the front-end of project management. Engineering Project Organization Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2013.775942

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.