Cited by 35Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

ADHD and Giftedness: A Neurocognitive Consideration of Twice Exceptionality

Budding, Deborah, Chidekel, Dana·2012·Applied Neuropsychology: Child

Abstract

Current models of cognition and behavioral diagnosis emphasize categorical classification over continuous considerations of function and promote the "differential diagnosis" of various conditions according to observational criteria. However, an overemphasis on a purely behavioral, categorical approach to understanding human function fails to address the comorbidity of different disorders and does not include a consideration of overlapping levels of function, from "pathological" through "normal," to "gifted" or exceptional. The frequent co-occurrence of "gifted" and "pathological" function is thus difficult to understand from a corticocentric and purely behavioral and observational point of view. This article reviews "giftedness" in relation to the diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, coexistence of which is termed "twice exceptional." It additionally considers problems in assessing these functions using current neuropsychological tests and methodologies that are presumably based upon a corticocentric model of cognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21622965.2012.699423

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with high intelligence may show typical ADHD-like features, such as high levels of activity, low impulse control, frustration and boredom, and poor attentional span.

    “Individuals with high intelligence may show typical ADHD-like features, such as high levels of activity, low impulse control, frustration and boredom, and poor attentional span [11].”
  • Empirical investigations have provided no consistent evidence of the impact of intellectual giftedness on socio-emotional development.

    “However, empirical investigations have provided no consistent evidence of this impact.”
  • Some studies have found an association between giftedness and internalizing problems.

    “Some studies have found an association between giftedness and internalizing problems, which involve excessive control of emotions and behavior, anxiety, social withdrawal, low self-esteem, or excessive perfectionism [e.g., 11].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Budding, D., & Chidekel, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Private Practice
Corresponding author
Budding, Deborah
Venue
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Published
2012-07
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
145-151
ISSN
  • 2162-2965 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2973
OpenAlex
W2125462791
Cited by
35
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Neuropsychology Child (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
twice-exceptional, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, giftedness, comorbidities, neurocognitive function, categorical diagnosis, differential diagnosis, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Intelligence, Neuropsychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review