Cited by 132Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersGut microbiota and healthAntibiotic Use and Resistance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antibiotic use and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a pooled analysis of 2740 cancer patients

Open access
Huang, Xuan-Zhang, Gao, Peng, Song, Yong-Xi, Xu, Yan, Sun, Jing-Xu, Chen, Xiao-Wan, Zhao, Jun-Hua, Wang, Zhen-Ning·2019·OncoImmunology

Abstract

The gut microbiota plays a critical role in the anti-tumor immune response. There is increasing data showing that antibiotics (ATBs) change the composition of the gut microbiota and affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, this is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the association between ATB use and ICI efficacy in cancer patients to provide a better understanding of the strength of this association. We performed a literature search for relevant studies that evaluated the relationship between ATB use and ICI efficacy using the PubMed, Embase, and conference databases. The primary outcomes consisted of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) measured by hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. A total of 19 eligible studies comprising 2,740 cancer patients treated with ICIs were included in the analysis. Our results indicated that ATB use was negatively associated with OS in cancer patients (HR = 2.37; 95% CI = 2.05–2.75; P < .001), without heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; P = .851). Moreover, ATB use significantly reduced PFS in patients treated with ICIs (HR = 1.84; 95% CI = 1.49–2.26; P < .001; I2 = 56.2%). Similar results were obtained in the subgroup analyses stratified by the time of ATB use and cancer type. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of our results. Therefore, the findings of our meta-analysis indicated that ATB use is negatively associated with OS and PFS in cancer patients treated with ICI immunotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/2162402x.2019.1665973

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Literature search and study selection.
Figure 1. Literature search and study selection.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2. The associations between antibiotic use and overall survival (a) and progression-free survival (b) in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Figure 2. The associations between antibiotic use and overall survival (a) and progression-free survival (b) in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Sensitivity analysis of overall survival (a) and progression-free survival (b) based on leave-one-out approach.
Figure 3. Sensitivity analysis of overall survival (a) and progression-free survival (b) based on leave-one-out approach.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 4. The associations between pre-therapy antibiotic use and overall survival (a) and progression-free survival (b) in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Figure 4. The associations between pre-therapy antibiotic use and overall survival (a) and progression-free survival (b) in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Funnel plot of progression-free survival. A: overall analysis; B: sample size ≥ 100 subgroup.
Figure 5. Funnel plot of progression-free survival. A: overall analysis; B: sample size ≥ 100 subgroup.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 132

Metadata

Authors
Huang, X.-Z., Gao, P., Song, Y.-X., Xu, Y., Sun, J.-X., Chen, X.-W., Zhao, J.-H., & Wang, Z.-N.
Affiliations
  • Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
  • First Hospital of China Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Zhen-Ning
Venue
OncoImmunology
Published
2019-09-23
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
e1665973-e1665973
ISSN
  • 2162-4011 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-402X
OpenAlex
W2976586374
Cited by
132
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • OncoImmunology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
China Medical University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
antibiotic use, immune checkpoint inhibitors, gut microbiota, cancer immunotherapy, overall survival, progression-free survival, antitumor immunity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review