Cited by 144Smart Cities and TechnologiesUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionUrban Planning and Governance

Beyond techno-utopia and its discontents: On the role of utopianism and speculative fiction in shaping alternatives to the smart city imaginary

Open access
Bina, Olivia, Inch, Andy, Pereira, Lavínia·2020·Futures

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.futures.2019.102475

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bloch, E. (1995). The Principle of Hope (Vol. 3 vols). London: MIT Press.
  2. Cugurullo, Federico. (2017). The story does not remain the same: multi-scalar perspectives on sustainable urban development in Asia and Hong Kong. Sustainable Cities in Asia. London: Routledge.
  3. Futures Journal. (2018). Futures @ 50 + 50: 50 Year Anniversary Themes - Theme 2: Framing Futures in 2068. Futures, https://www.journals.elsevier.com/futures/50years-anniversary/theme- 52-framing-futures-in-2068 (accessed: 2062/2065/2018).
  4. Harvey, D. (2000). 2000: Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  5. Lawler, Donald L. (1980). Certain Assistances: The Utilities of Speculative Fictions in Shaping the Future. Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 13(3/4), 1-13.
  6. Miller, Riel. (2018a). Sensing and making-sense of Futures Literacy. In R. Miller (Ed.), Transforming the Future. Anticipation in the 21st Century (pp. 15- 50). Paris and Abingdon: UNESCO and Routledge.
  7. Morozov, Evgeny. (2014). The rise of data and the death of politics. The Guardian, 20(07), 2014.
  8. Polak, F. (1973). The Image of the Future, translated and abridged by E. Boulding Elsevier, Amsterdam, London, New York.
  9. Voros, Joseph. (2001). A primer on futures studies, foresight and the use of scenarios. Prospect: The Foresight Bulletin, 6(1).
  10. Williams, Raymond. (1975). The country and the city (Vol. 423): Oxford University Press, USA.
  11. Williams, Raymond. (1983). Culture and society, 1780-1950: Columbia University Press.

Authors
Bina, O., Inch, A., & Pereira, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Pereira, Lavínia
Venue
Futures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
115
Pages
102475
ISSN
0016-3287 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980800937
Cited by
144
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Futures (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/110582/2015)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
Keywords
techno-utopia, utopianism, speculative fiction, urban future, futures studies, critical urban studies, urban planning discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review