Cited by 711SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingAnimal Virus Infections Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Establishment and validation of a pseudovirus neutralization assay for SARS-CoV-2

Open access

Abstract

Pseudoviruses are useful virological tools because of their safety and versatility, especially for emerging and re-emerging viruses. Due to its high pathogenicity and infectivity and the lack of effective vaccines and therapeutics, live SARS-CoV-2 has to be handled under biosafety level 3 conditions, which has hindered the development of vaccines and therapeutics. Based on a VSV pseudovirus production system, a pseudovirus-based neutralization assay has been developed for evaluating neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in biosafety level 2 facilities. The key parameters for this assay were optimized, including cell types, cell numbers, virus inoculum. When tested against the SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus, SARS-CoV-2 convalescent patient sera showed high neutralizing potency, which underscore its potential as therapeutics. The limit of detection for this assay was determined as 22.1 and 43.2 for human and mouse serum samples respectively using a panel of 120 negative samples. The cutoff values were set as 30 and 50 for human and mouse serum samples, respectively. This assay showed relatively low coefficient of variations with 15.9% and 16.2% for the intra- and inter-assay analyses respectively. Taken together, we established a robust pseudovirus-based neutralization assay for SARS-CoV-2 and are glad to share pseudoviruses and related protocols with the developers of vaccines or therapeutics to fight against this lethal virus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/22221751.2020.1743767

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Verification of the incorporaiton of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the pseudovirus. The surface proteins of the particle were investigated using western blotting (A), from left to right lane showing VSV pseudovirus, medium control and SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus. The VSV pseudotyped virus and cell culture medium were prepared with the same procedure and used as negative control and pseudovirus negative control. The SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus, together with G*ΔG-VSV, were tested against VSV G specific antibody (B).
Figure 1. Verification of the incorporaiton of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the pseudovirus. The surface proteins of the particle were investigated using western blotting (A), from left to right lane showing VSV pseudovirus, medium control and SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus. The VSV pseudotyped virus and cell culture medium were prepared with the same procedure and used as negative control and pseudovirus negative control. The SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus, together with G*ΔG-VSV, were tested against VSV G specific antibody (B).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Selection of the cell line. Six types of cells were tested for VSV (A), and SARS-CoV-2 (B) pseudoviruses. The y-axis showed the absolute RLU value detected 24 h after pseudovirus infection. Cell backgrounds without pseudovirus infection were shown in figure C.
Figure 2. Selection of the cell line. Six types of cells were tested for VSV (A), and SARS-CoV-2 (B) pseudoviruses. The y-axis showed the absolute RLU value detected 24 h after pseudovirus infection. Cell backgrounds without pseudovirus infection were shown in figure C.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Optimization of cell numbers for neutralization. (A) Effect of cells numbers on the titration of pseudovirus. The y-axis showed the RLU fold over the cell background. (B) Effect of cells numbers on the neutralization. Cell numbers and corresponding R2 values were list in the tables. A serum sample from a healthy individual was tested as negative control shown in black lines and symbols.
Figure 3. Optimization of cell numbers for neutralization. (A) Effect of cells numbers on the titration of pseudovirus. The y-axis showed the RLU fold over the cell background. (B) Effect of cells numbers on the neutralization. Cell numbers and corresponding R2 values were list in the tables. A serum sample from a healthy individual was tested as negative control shown in black lines and symbols.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Optimization of virus dose for neutralization. The viral inocula with a dose range starting from 41 to 1300 TCID50/well were tested for SARS-CoV-2 PBNA. A serum sample from a healthy individual was tested as negative control shown in black lines and symbols.
Figure 4. Optimization of virus dose for neutralization. The viral inocula with a dose range starting from 41 to 1300 TCID50/well were tested for SARS-CoV-2 PBNA. A serum sample from a healthy individual was tested as negative control shown in black lines and symbols.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Validation of the SARS-CoV-2 PBNA. (A) Specificity of the PBNA. A negative sample panel of seventy-four human and forty-six mouse serum samples were used to determine the specificity of this assay. (B) Inhibition curves for two SARS-CoV-2 convalescent patient serum samples and two negative serum samples derived from human and mouse. Typical four-parameter inhibition curves were observed for these two samples between log-transformed dilution and inhibition rate. The initial dilutions for positive and negative samples were 1:30 and 1:10 respectively, followed by 3-fold serial dilution. (C) Linear range for the PBNA. When the inhibition rate is in the range of 20%–80%, there is a linear relationship between the readout of the test sample and its dilution. (D) Reproducibility of the PBNA. A mixture of two SARS-CoV-2 coalescent patient serum samples was tested a total of 18 times on individual plates in three independent runs.
Figure 5. Validation of the SARS-CoV-2 PBNA. (A) Specificity of the PBNA. A negative sample panel of seventy-four human and forty-six mouse serum samples were used to determine the specificity of this assay. (B) Inhibition curves for two SARS-CoV-2 convalescent patient serum samples and two negative serum samples derived from human and mouse. Typical four-parameter inhibition curves were observed for these two samples between log-transformed dilution and inhibition rate. The initial dilutions for positive and negative samples were 1:30 and 1:10 respectively, followed by 3-fold serial dilution. (C) Linear range for the PBNA. When the inhibition rate is in the range of 20%–80%, there is a linear relationship between the readout of the test sample and its dilution. (D) Reproducibility of the PBNA. A mixture of two SARS-CoV-2 coalescent patient serum samples was tested a total of 18 times on individual plates in three independent runs.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 696

Metadata

Authors
Nie, J., Li, Q., Wu, J., Zhao, C., Hao, H., Liu, H., Zhang, L., Nie, L., Qin, H., Wang, M., Lu, Q., Li, X., Sun, Q., Liu, J., Fan, C., Huang, W., Xu, M., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Weijin
  • Xu, Miao
  • Wang, Youchun
Venue
Emerging Microbes & Infections
Published
2020-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
680-686
ISSN
2222-1751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012650581
Cited by
711
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 186 · 2020: 141
FWCI
19.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emerging Microbes & Infections (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, pseudovirus neutralization assay, neutralizing antibodies, biosafety level 2, convalescent sera, assay validation, detection limit, cut-off values, COVID-19 treatment
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Serotherapy, Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Cell Line, Humans, Immune Sera, Immunization, Passive, Membrane Glycoproteins, Neutralization Tests, Plasmids, Pneumonia, Viral, Sensitivity and Specificity, Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus, Viral Envelope Proteins, Reproducibility of Results, Coronavirus Infections, Mice, Virus Internalization, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Limit of Detection, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review