CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 316IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AIPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Security and privacy in the internet of things

Open access
Maple, Carsten·2017·Journal of Cyber Policy
DOI 10.1080/23738871.2017.1366536
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The internet of things (IoT) is a technology that has the capacity to revolutionise the way that we live, in sectors ranging from transport to health, from entertainment to our interactions with government. This fantastic opportunity also presents a number of significant challenges. The growth in the number of devices and the speed of that growth presents challenges to our security and freedoms as we battle to develop policies, standards, and governance that shape this development without stifling innovation. This paper discusses the evolution of the IoT, its various definitions, and some of its key application areas. Security and privacy considerations and challenges that lie ahead are discussed both generally and in the context of these applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23738871.2017.1366536

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most existing research and industrial practice in railway cybersecurity focus on incident response, supply chain security, or high-level governance models, with less attention given to sensor-level risk mechanisms that underpin system reliability.

    “However, most existing research and industrial practice in railway cybersecurity focus on incident response, supply chain security, or high-level governance models, with less attention given to the sensor-level risk mechanisms that underpin system reliability [11,12,13].”

    From Sensor-Based Cyber Risk Management in Railway Infrastructure Under the NIS2 Directive (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Ashton Kevin., 2009, RFiD Journal, 97
  2. 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1007/s11277-011-0288-5 · DOI
  4. 10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1109/MIC.2007.45 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/MC.2014.150 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s12599-009-0066-z · DOI
  8. 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0794 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/MIC.2015.108 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/MVT.2009.933478 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.104 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.elerap.2008.04.003 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/2076450.2076470 · DOI
  14. 10.5120/19787-1571 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.530 · DOI
  16. Feruza Y. Sattarova, 2007, International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 2, 17
  17. 10.1007/s11277-011-0385-5 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.future.2015.09.016 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2437951 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.008 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s10796-014-9492-7 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2631891 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Macaulay James, 2015, DHL Trend Research, 1, 1
  24. 10.3390/jsan5010003 · DOI
  25. Mahalle Parikshit N., 2013, Journal of Cyber Security, 1, 309
  26. 10.1109/TIFS.2011.2165540 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s00145-010-9088-4 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.comnet.2016.03.011 · DOI
  29. Mansfield-Devine Steve., 2016, Computer Fraud & Security, 44, 51
  30. 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016 · DOI
  31. Morrish J., 2014, Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Communications: Architecture, Performance and Applications, 339
  32. Peppet Scott R., 2014, Texas Law Revew, 93, 85
  33. 10.1109/MSP.2005.157 · DOI
  34. Rainie Lee, 2013, Pew Research Center, September, 5
  35. 10.1109/TDSC.2007.1004 · DOI
  36. Reay Ian, 2009, ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 3, 6
  37. 10.1109/DCOSS.2013.78 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/MC.2011.291 · DOI
  39. Rose Karen, 2015, The Internet Society (ISOC)
  40. 10.1007/s11277-009-9697-0 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.comnet.2014.11.008 · DOI
  42. 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2312291 · DOI
  43. Suo Hui, 2012, IEEE International Conference Computer Science and Electronics Engineering (ICCSEE), 3, 648
  44. 10.1007/s10676-010-9263-1 · DOI
  45. 10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/978-3-642-19157-2_1 · DOI
  47. Vermesan Ovidiu, 2011, Internet of Things-Global Technological and Societal Trends, 1, 9
  48. 10.4018/978-1-60566-132-2.ch013 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s10796-014-9489-2 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/j.jnca.2014.01.014 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328 · DOI
  53. 10.1002/sec.795 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maple, C.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Maple, Carsten
ORCID
Maple, Carsten
Venue
Journal of Cyber Policy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-05-04
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
155-184
ISSN
  • 2373-8871 (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-8898
DOI
10.1080/23738871.2017.1366536
OpenAlex
W2749806099
Cited by
316
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 2
FWCI
19.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Cyber Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cyber Security of the Internet of Things (EPSRC Grant EP/N02334X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
Internet of Things, Internet of Things security, privacy, IoT governance, IoT standards, IoT policy, IoT applications, cyber policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review