The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communication, Organization, and Crisis
Abstract
Communication is increasingly recognized as an important process in organizational crisis and crisis management. The Three Mile Island incident, the Bhopal Union Carbide accident, the crash of Northwest Airlines Flight 255, and the Exxon Valdez oil spill can all be described as specific, unexpected, and nonroutine events or series of events that created high levels of uncertainty and threat or perceived threat to an organization’s high-priority goals. Crises disrupt employees and communities, damage corporate reputations, and cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Crises also serve as the impetus for investigations and organizational change. This review organizes a dynamic and growing body of communication and organizational literature dealing with crisis, including various developmental approaches used to describe crisis, decision making, public relations, rhetorical approaches, organizational legitimacy, and methodologies for crisis communication research. Research themes and new directions are identified. Weick’s concept of enactment, stakeholder theory, and chaos theory are discussed as frameworks for emerging research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.177 · Cited by 2,228
The Organizational and Interorganizational Development of Disasters
Turner, B. A. (1976) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391850 · Cited by 876
Designs for Crisis Decision Units
Smart, C., & Vertinsky, I. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392406 · Cited by 323
Cited by
Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model
REYNOLDS, B., & W. SEEGER, M. (2005) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730590904571 · Cited by 1,287
Synchronous failure: the emerging causal architecture of global crisis
Homer-Dixon, T., Walker, B., Biggs, R., Crépin, A.-S., Folke, C., Lambin, E. F., Peterson, G. D., Rockström, J., Scheffer, M., Steffen, W., et al. (2015) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-07681-200306 · Cited by 244
Exploring Corporate Reputation and Crisis Communication
Nuortimo, K., Harkonen, J., & Breznik, K. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-024-00353-8 · Cited by 39
von Eckardstein, A., & Rohrer, L. (2016) · Current Opinion in Lipidology · doi:10.1097/mol.0000000000000294 · Cited by 33
Pratici, L., Salvatore, F. P., Fanelli, S., Zangrandi, A., & Milone, M. (2025) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2023-2012 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R.
- Venue
- Annals of the International Communication Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 231-276
- ISSN
- 2380-8977 (ISSN-L)
- 2380-8985
- OpenAlex
- W2475934742
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communication, Organization, and Crisis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/23808985.1998.11678952
- The paper
- Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). Communication, Organization, and Crisis. Annals of the International Communication Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1998.11678952
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.