Cited by 23Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Internet-connected devices ownership, use and interests in bipolar disorder: from desktop to mobile mental health

Open access
Hidalgo-Mazzei, Diego, Nikolova, Viktoriya L., Kitchen, Simon, Young, Allan H.·2019·Digital Psychiatry

Abstract

Advances in communication technologies have led to a new era of ubiquitous accessibility to Internet-based platforms (IBPs) and devices with an unprecedented potential for mental health. However, it is rarely explored if potential user groups own devices from which they can access these or whether they are interested in the development of new platforms. Two anonymous surveys were circulated to 20,000 subscribers of the Bipolar UK e-newsletter. A total of 570 people responded to the first survey and 286 responded to the second. The first contained five questions regarding participants’ interest in a smartphone IBP to support their illness while the second consisted in 27 questions exploring devices ownership and use as well as their potential interest in emerging new IBPs: 97.6% of respondents were diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD) by a healthcare professional and 92.8% of them owned a smartphone. The most frequent purposes for daily smartphone use were text messaging (73.4%), e-mail (71.3%) and social networks (53.8%). About 77% of respondents expressed willingness to receive self-management strategies through a smartphone app. The pattern of wide-spread and growing ownership and use of devices with access to IBPs among people with BD is similar to that of the general population. Combined with the expressed interest in novel technological developments for disorder self-management, this represents a great opportunity to establish a two-way avenue to collect and deliver novel type of interventions offering personalized material to people with BD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/2575517x.2019.1616476

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Estimates of app use may be higher amongst respondents to a web-based survey relative to community samples.

    “Further, estimates of app use may be higher amongst respondents to a web-based survey relative to community samples, although rates of smartphone ownership are similar to other large-scale BD surveys (Hidalgo-Mazzei et al. 2019).”

    From Evaluating the quality, safety, and functionality of commonly used smartphone apps for bipolar disorder mood and sleep self-management (2022) · cites this paper as Hidalgo-Mazzei et al. 2019

    The Limitations section identifies a selection bias: respondents recruited through an e-newsletter were already using internet technologies and might be more interested in using them in the future. The Discussion reports that 34.9% currently used mental health apps, but the paper does not compare app-use rates with a community sample or say that web-survey respondents' app use is higher. It does report smartphone ownership in its BD survey, supporting the citing sentence's use of it as a comparison survey. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Internet-connected device ownership and interest in smartphone-based interventions is high amongst people living with BD.

    “Given that internet-connected device ownership and interest in smartphone-based interventions is high amongst people living with BD (Hidalgo-Mazzei et al. 2019)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. StatCounter Global Stats. Mobile and tablet internet usage exceeds desktop for first time worldwide j StatCounter Global Stats; 2016. Available at: http:// gs.statcounter.com/press/mobile-and-tablet-internet- usage-exceeds-desktop-for-first-time-worldwide (Accessed 28 April 2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hidalgo-Mazzei, D., Nikolova, V. L., Kitchen, S., & Young, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychological Medicine, Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK;
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Bipolar UK, London, UK
Corresponding author
Young, Allan H.
Venue
Digital Psychiatry
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
2575-517X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947716892
Cited by
23
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
bipolar disorder, IoT devices, smartphone ownership, smartphone use, mobile mental health, web platform, self-management strategies, mobile application, social networks, text messaging, email

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review