Cited by 127Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

How people with serious mental illness use smartphones, mobile apps, and social media.

Open access
Naslund, John A., Aschbrenner, Kelly A., Bartels, Stephen J.·2016·Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research shows that people with serious mental illness are increasingly using mobile devices. Less is known about how these individuals use their mobile devices or whether they access social media. We surveyed individuals with serious mental illness to explore their use of these technologies. METHOD: Individuals with serious mental illness engaged in lifestyle interventions through community mental health centers completed a survey about their use of mobile and online technologies. Responses were compared with data from the general population. RESULTS: Among respondents (n = 70), 93% owned cellphones, 78% used text messaging, 50% owned smartphones, and 71% used social media such as Facebook. Most respondents reported daily use of text messaging, mobile apps, and social media. Technology use was comparable to the general population, though smartphone ownership was lower. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These findings can inform future interventions that fully leverage this group's use of popular digital technologies. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/prj0000207

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings of 6 recent systematic reviews of digital interventions for serious mental illnesses demonstrate that these are feasible and acceptable, with preliminary indications that these may be effective for symptoms and cognitive and social outcomes.

    “The findings of 6 recent systematic reviews of digital interventions for serious mental illnesses demonstrate that these are feasible and acceptable, with preliminary indications that these may be effective for symptoms and cognitive and social outcomes [24-29].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., & Bartels, S. J.
Venue
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Published
2016-12
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
364-367
ISSN
  • 1095-158X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-3126
OpenAlex
W2422609283
Cited by
126
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
26.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH089811)
  • Agency for Health care Research and Quality (K12 HS021695-01)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Cooperative Agreement U48 DP005018)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
severe mental illness, smartphone use, mobile application, social media, text messaging, technology use, smartphone ownership, community mental health centers
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Centers, Humans, Cell Phone, Social Media, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review