Cited by 351Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Learning in Education

Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of “mHealth” Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies

Open access
Firth, Joseph, Cotter, Jack, Torous, John, Bucci, Sandra, Firth, Josh A., Yung, Alison R.·2016·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

There is currently growing interest in using mobile phones to support the treatment of psychotic disorders, such as schizophrenia. However, the widespread implementation of these interventions will ultimately depend upon patients' access to mobile devices and their willingness to engage with mobile health ("mHealth"). Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess mobile phone ownership and interest in mHealth among patients with psychosis. An electronic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, AMED, Health Technology Assessment Database, and Health Management Information Consortium Database was conducted, using search terms synonymous with mobile phones and psychotic disorders. The initial literature search yielded 2572 results. Fifteen studies matched eligibility criteria, reporting data from 12 independent samples of psychiatric patients (n = 3227). Data pertaining to mobile phone ownership, usage, and opinions on mHealth among patients with psychotic disorders were extracted from these studies, and meta-analytic techniques were applied. The overall mobile phone ownership rate was 66.4% (95% CI = 54.1%-77.6%). However, we found strong statistical evidence that mobile phone ownership has been significantly increasing since 2007, and the rate among patients surveyed in the last 2 years was 81.4% (n = 454). Furthermore, in surveys of mHealth acceptability, the majority of patients responded in favor of using mobile phones to enhance contact with services and support self-management. Considering the increasing availability of mobile phones and the broad acceptability of mHealth among patients, there is now a need to develop and evaluate mHealth interventions to enhance healthcare services for people with psychosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbv132

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with mental disorders are increasingly gaining access to and using mobile devices, such as smartphones.

    “Recent studies have shown that individuals with mental disorders are increasingly gaining access to and using mobile devices, such as smartphones”

    From Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice (2020) · cites this paper as Firth et al., 2015

    The Results and Discussion report that mobile-phone ownership increased over time among people with psychosis, and the Results report daily use by some phone owners. The study does not establish an increasing trend in use or smartphone ownership, and its findings on ownership are specific to psychotic disorders rather than mental disorders generally. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1]1. Horvath T, Azman H, Kennedy GE, Rutherford GW. Mobile phone text messaging for promoting adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;4:CD009756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]2. Gurol‐Urganci I, de Jongh T, Vodopivec‐Jamsek V, Atun R, Car J. Mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance at healthcare appointments. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD007458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]3. Gurol‐Urganci I, de Jongh T, Vodopivec‐Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging for communicating results of medical investigations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD007456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [5]5. Ainsworth J, Palmier-Claus JE, Machin M, et al. A comparison of two delivery modalities of a mobile phone-based assessment for serious mental illness: native smartphone application vs text-messaging only implementations. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [8]8. Marcano Belisario JS, Huckvale K, Greenfield G, Car J, Gunn LH. Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:CD010013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [10]10. Ben-Zeev D. Mobile technologies in the study, assessment, and treatment of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:384–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [12]12. Španiel F, Hrdlicka J, Novák T, et al. Effectiveness of the information technology-aided program of relapse prevention in schizophrenia (ITAREPS): a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. J Psychiatr Pract. 2012;18:269–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [13]13. Palmier-Claus JE, Rogers A, Ainsworth J, et al. Integrating mobile-phone based assessment for psychosis into people’s everyday lives and clinical care: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. [14]14. Ben-Zeev D, Brenner CJ, Begale M, Duffecy J, Mohr DC, Mueser KT. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a smartphone intervention for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40:1244–1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [17]17. Schizophrenia Commission. The abandoned illness: a report from the Schizophrenia Commission. London: Rethink Mental Illness; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. [18]18. Department of Health. No health without mental health: a cross-government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages. London, UK: Stationery Office; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  12. [19]19. Wang J-Y, Bennett K, Probst J. Subdividing the digital divide: differences in internet access and use among rural residents with medical limitations. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [23]23. Jahns R, Houck P. Mobile Health Market Report 2013–2017. Research2Guidance 2013. http://www.research2guidance.com/shop/index.php/mobile-healthtrends-and-figures. Accessed June 21, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  14. [24]24. Sanghara H, Kravariti E, Jakobsen H, Okocha CI. Using short message services in mental health services: assessing feasibility. Ment Health Rev. 2010;15:28–33. [Google Scholar]
  15. [25]25. Daker-White G, Rogers A. What is the potential for social networks and support to enhance future telehealth interventions for people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia: a critical interpretive synthesis. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Firth, J., Cotter, J., Torous, J., Bucci, S., Firth, J. A., & Yung, A. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Firth, Joseph
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2015-09-22
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
448-455
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2267837598
Cited by
351
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 2
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L005301/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (1223292)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
mobile phone ownership, mobile health
MeSH terms
Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotic Disorders, Telemedicine, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review