Cited by 555Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologySex work and related issues

Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic disorder and in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder

Open access
MESTON, CINDY M.·2003·Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy

Abstract

The Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI; Rosen et al., 2000) is a self-report measure of sexual functioning that has been validated on a clinically diagnosed sample of women with female sexual arousal disorder. The present investigation extended the validation of the FSFI to include women with a primary clinical diagnosis of female orgasmic disorder (FOD; n = 71) or hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD; n = 44). Internal consistency and divergent validity of the FSFI were within the acceptable range for these populations of women. Significant differences between women with FOD and controls and between women with HSDD and controls were noted for each of the FSFI domain and total scores.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/713847100

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MESTON, C. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
MESTON, CINDY M.
Venue
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Published
2003-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
39-46
ISSN
  • 0092-623X (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0715
OpenAlex
W2147117726
Cited by
555
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 27
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT000224, 5 RO1 AT00224-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
Keywords
Female Sexual Function Index, female orgasmic disorder, hypoactive sexual desire disorder, female sexual dysfunction, sexual function assessment, psychometric validation, internal consistency, discriminant validity, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Sexual Behavior, Reproducibility of Results, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review