Cited by 43Sexual function and dysfunction studiesChild Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

A dyadic perspective on childhood maltreatment for women with provoked Vestibulodynia and their partners: associations with pain and sexual and psychosocial functioning

Corsini-Munt, Serena, Bergeron, Sophie, Rosen, Natalie O., Beaulieu, Noémie, Steben, Marc·2017·The Journal of Sex Research

Abstract

Childhood maltreatment is robustly associated with adult-onset vulvodynia, a common form of female genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder. However, little is known about the impact of childhood maltreatment on current sexual, psychological, and relationship adaptation for couples with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). This study examined the associations between childhood maltreatment and sexual and psychosocial functioning and pain in women with PVD, the most common subtype of vulvodynia, and their partners. A total of 49 couples (Mage women = 27.80, SD = 6.05; Mage men = 30.04; SD = 6.48) with PVD completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), as well as measures of sexual functioning, couple satisfaction, and anxiety. Women also reported on their pain during intercourse. Analyses were guided by the actor–partner interdependence model. Women’s higher reports of childhood maltreatment were associated with their lower sexual functioning and higher anxiety. Partners’ higher reports of childhood maltreatment were associated with their lower sexual functioning, lower couple satisfaction, and higher anxiety, as well as women’s lower couple satisfaction and higher anxiety. Both women’s and partners’ higher reports of childhood maltreatment were associated with higher affective pain for women. Findings suggest childhood maltreatment experienced by women with PVD and their partners should be considered as part of treatment planning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224499.2016.1158229

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corsini-Munt, S., Bergeron, S., Rosen, N. O., Beaulieu, N., & Steben, M.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2016-04-21
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
308-318
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
OpenAlex
W2339410821
Cited by
43
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (130298)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
child abuse, provoked vestibulodynia, vulvodynia, dyads, sexual function, partner satisfaction, anxiety, affective pain, partner effects, actor-partner interdependence
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult, Vulvodynia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review