Cited by 97Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Surgical versus low-dose progestin treatment for endometriosis-associated severe deep dyspareunia II: effect on sexual functioning, psychological status and health-related quality of life

Vercellini, P., Frattaruolo, M. P., Somigliana, E., Jones, G. L., Consonni, D., Alberico, D., Fedele, L.·2013·Human Reproduction

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Does surgical and low-dose progestin treatment differentially affect endometriosis-associated severe deep dyspareunia in terms of sexual functioning, psychological status and health-related quality of life? SUMMARY ANSWER: Surgery and progestin treatment achieved essentially similar benefits at 12-month follow-up, but with different temporal trends. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Conservative surgery and hormonal therapies have been used independently for endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia with inconsistent results. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Patient preference, parallel cohort study with 12-month follow-up. The effect of conservative surgery at laparoscopy versus treatment with a low dose of norethisterone acetate per os (2.5 mg/day) in women with persistent/recurrent severe deep dyspareunia after first-line surgery was compared. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS AND SETTING, METHODS: A total of 51 patients chose repeat surgery and 103 progestin treatment. Variations in sexual function, psychological well-being and quality of life were measured by means of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Four women in the surgery group and 21 women in the progestin group withdrew from the study for various reasons. Total FSFI scores, anxiety and depression scores and EHP-30 scores improved immediately after surgery, but worsened with time, whereas the effect during progestin use increased more gradually, but progressively, without overall significant between-group differences at 12-month follow-up. A tendency was observed towards a slightly better total FSFI score after surgery at the end of the study period. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Treatments were not randomly allocated, and distribution of participants as well as of dropouts between study arms was unbalanced. However, the possibility of choosing the treatment allowed assessment of the maximum potential effect size of the interventions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Both surgery and medical treatment with progestins are valuable options for improving the detrimental impact of endometriosis-associated dyspareunia on sexual functioning and quality of life. Women should be aware of the pros and cons of both options to decide which one best suits their needs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by a research grant from the University of Milan School of Medicine (PUR number 2009-ATE-0570). None of the authors have a conflict of interest.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/det041

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schmoor C, Olschewski M, Schumacher M. Randomized and non-randomized patients in clinical trials: experiences with comprehensive color studies. Stat Med 1996;15:263 -271.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vercellini, P., Frattaruolo, M. P., Somigliana, E., Jones, G. L., Consonni, D., Alberico, D., & Fedele, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Vercellini, P.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2013-02-26
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
1221-1230
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2165599785
Cited by
97
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Milano
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, deep dyspareunia, conservative surgery, laparoscopic surgery, low-dose progestin, norethisterone acetate, sexual function, psychological well-being, anxiety and depression, health-related quality of life, patient preferences, treatment selection, recurrent endometriosis, hormone therapy, Female Sexual Function Index, Endometriosis Health Profile-30
MeSH terms
Norethindrone Acetate, Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Dyspareunia, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Norethindrone, Laparoscopy, Progestins, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review