The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Isolated osteoclasts resorb the organic and inorganic components of bone.
Open accessAbstract
Osteoclasts are the principal resorptive cells of bone, yet their capacity to degrade collagen, the major organic component of bone matrix, remains unexplored. Accordingly, we have studied the bone resorptive activity of highly enriched populations of isolated chicken osteoclasts, using as substrate devitalized rat bone which had been labeled in vivo with L-[5-3H]proline or 45Ca, and bone-like matrix produced and mineralized in vitro by osteoblast-like rat osteosarcoma cells. When co-cultured with a radiolabeled substrate, osteoclast-mediated mineral mobilization reached a maximal rate within 2 h, whereas organic matrix degradation appeared more slowly, reaching maximal rate by 12-24 h. Thereafter, the rates of organic and inorganic matrix resorption were essentially linear and parallel for at least 6 d when excess substrate was available. Osteoclast-mediated degradation of bone collagen was confirmed by amino acid analysis. 39% of the solubilized tritium was recovered as trans-4-hydroxyproline, 47% as proline. 10,000 osteoclasts solubilized 70% of the total radioactivity and 65% of the [3H]-trans-4-hydroxyproline from 100 micrograms of 25-50 micron bone fragments within 5 d. Virtually all released tritium-labeled protein was of low molecular weight, 99% with Mr less than or equal to 10,000, and 65% with Mr less than or equal to 1,000. Moreover, when the 14% of resorbed [3H]proline-labeled peptides with Mr greater than or equal to 2,000 were examined for the presence of TCA and TCB, the characteristic initial products of mammalian collagenase activity, none was detected by SDS PAGE. In addition, osteoclast-conditioned medium had no collagenolytic activity, and exogenous TCA and TCB fragments were not degraded by osteoclasts. On the other hand, osteoclast lysates have collagenolytic enzyme activity in acidic but not in neutral buffer, with maximum activity at pH 4.0. These data indicate that osteoclasts have the capacity to resorb the organic phase of bone by a process localized to the osteoclast and its attachment site. This process appears to be independent of secretion of neutral collagenase and probably reflects acid protease activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mecham, R. P., & Lange, G. (1982) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00533a013 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Bone Resorption by Osteoclasts
Teitelbaum, S. L. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5484.1504 · Cited by 3,962
Self-citationSato, M., Grasser, W., Endo, N., Akins, R., Simmons, H., Thompson, D. D., Golub, E., & Rodan, G. A. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci115539 · Cited by 1,004
Osteoclasts: What Do They Do and How Do They Do It?
Teitelbaum, S. L. (2007) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.2353/ajpath.2007.060834 · Cited by 730
Self-citationRoss, F. P., Chappel, J., Alvarez, J. I., Sander, D., Butler, W. T., Farach-Carson, M. C., Mintz, K. A., Robey, P. G., Teitelbaum, S. L., & Cheresh, D. A. (1993) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)98430-9 · Cited by 537
Self-citationAvian osteoclasts as estrogen target cells.
Oursler, M. J., Osdoby, P., Pyfferoen, J., Riggs, B. L., & Spelsberg, T. C. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.15.6613 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Blair, H. C., Kahn, A. J., Crouch, E. C., Jeffrey, J. J., & Teitelbaum, S. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1986-04-01
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1164-1172
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2139090888
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.