The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arp2/3 Complex and Actin Depolymerizing Factor/Cofilin in Dendritic Organization and Treadmilling of Actin Filament Array in Lamellipodia
Open accessAbstract
The leading edge (∼1 μm) of lamellipodia in Xenopus laevis keratocytes and fibroblasts was shown to have an extensively branched organization of actin filaments, which we term the dendritic brush. Pointed ends of individual filaments were located at Y-junctions, where the Arp2/3 complex was also localized, suggesting a role of the Arp2/3 complex in branch formation. Differential depolymerization experiments suggested that the Arp2/3 complex also provided protection of pointed ends from depolymerization. Actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin was excluded from the distal 0.4 μm of the lamellipodial network of keratocytes and in fibroblasts it was located within the depolymerization-resistant zone. These results suggest that ADF/cofilin, per se, is not sufficient for actin brush depolymerization and a regulatory step is required. Our evidence supports a dendritic nucleation model (Mullins, R.D., J.A. Heuser, and T.D. Pollard. 1998. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:6181–6186) for lamellipodial protrusion, which involves treadmilling of a branched actin array instead of treadmilling of individual filaments. In this model, Arp2/3 complex and ADF/cofilin have antagonistic activities. Arp2/3 complex is responsible for integration of nascent actin filaments into the actin network at the cell front and stabilizing pointed ends from depolymerization, while ADF/cofilin promotes filament disassembly at the rear of the brush, presumably by pointed end depolymerization after dissociation of the Arp2/3 complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of actin dynamics in cell motility
Carlier, M.-F., & Pantaloni, D. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1062 · Cited by 351
Distribution among tissues and intracellular localization of cofilin, a 21kDa actin-binding protein.
Yonezawa, N., Nishida, E., Koyasu, S., Maekawa, S., Ohta, Y., Yahara, I., & Sakai, H. (1987) · Cell Structure and Function · doi:10.1247/csf.12.443 · Cited by 60
Cited by
RHO GTPASES: Biochemistry and Biology
Jaffe, A. B., & Hall, A. (2005) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.020604.150721 · Cited by 3,009
The WASP-WAVE protein network: Connecting the membrane to the cytoskeleton.
Takenawa, T., & Suetsugu, S. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2069 · Cited by 947
Choi, C. K., Vicente-Manzanares, M., Zareno, J., Whitmore, L. A., Mogilner, A., & Horwitz, A. R. (2008) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1763 · Cited by 797
The actin cytoskeleton and actin-based motility
Svitkina, T. (2018) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a018267 · Cited by 761
Self-citationPhagocytosis and the actin cytoskeleton
May, R. C., & Machesky, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.114.6.1061 · Cited by 715
Metadata
- Authors
- Svitkina, T. M., & Borisy, G. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1999-05-31
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1009-1026
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2105789974
- Cited by
- 1,180
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.