The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
G protein–coupled receptor/arrestin3 modulation of the endocytic machinery
Abstract
Nonvisual arrestins (arr) modulate G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) desensitization and internalization and bind to both clathrin (CL) and AP-2 components of the endocytic coated pit (CP). This raises the possibility that endocytosis of some GPCRs may be a consequence of arr-induced de novo CP formation. To directly test this hypothesis, we examined the behavior of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-arr3 in live cells expressing β2-adrenergic receptors and fluorescent CL. After agonist stimulation, the diffuse GFP-arr3 signal rapidly became punctate and colocalized virtually completely with preexisting CP spots, demonstrating that activated complexes accumulate in previously formed CPs rather than nucleating new CP formation. After arr3 recruitment, CP appeared larger: electron microscopy analysis revealed an increase in both CP number and in the occurrence of clustered CPs. Mutant arr3 proteins with impaired binding to CL or AP-2 displayed reduced recruitment to CPs, but were still capable of inducing CP clustering. In contrast, though constitutively present in CPs, the COOH-terminal moiety of arr3, which contains CP binding sites but lacks receptor binding, did not induce CP clustering. Together, these results indicate that recruitment of functional arr3–GPCR complexes to CP is necessary to induce clustering. Latrunculin B or 16°C blocked CP rearrangements without affecting arr3 recruitment to CP. These results and earlier studies suggest that discrete CP zones exist on cell surfaces, each capable of supporting adjacent CPs, and that the cortical actin membrane skeleton is intimately involved with both the maintenance of existing CPs and the generation of new structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Beta-arrestin appears to accompany heptahelical receptors into existing coated buds.
“This distinguishes this group of proteins from b-arrestin, which, despite also containing PtdIns(4,5)P 2 -, AP-2-and clathrinbinding determinants, appears to accompany heptahelical receptors into existing coated buds (Santini et al., 2002;Scott et al., 2002).”
From Disabled‐2 exhibits the properties of a cargo‐selective endocytic clathrin adaptor (2002) · cites this paper as Santini et al., 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Latrunculins: Novel Marine Toxins That Disrupt Microfilament Organization in Cultured Cells
Spector, I., Shochet, N. R., Kashman, Y., & Groweiss, A. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6681676 · Cited by 750
Chen, H., Slepnev, V. I., Di Fiore, P. P., & De Camilli, P. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.6.3257 · Cited by 138 · cited 2×
“, 1996; Gaidarov and Keen, 1999) and to undergo reversible phosphorylation (Wilde and Brodsky, 1996; Slepnev et al., 1998; Chen et al., 1999; Chu et al., 1999) in response to receptor stimulation.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 64
- 1990, J. Biol. Chem., 265, 745, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)40113-0 · DOI
- 1997, Eur. J. Immunol., 27, 1881, 10.1002/eji.1830270810 · DOI
- 1990, J. Immunol., 145, 3814, 10.4049/jimmunol.145.11.3814 · DOI
- 1995, Mol. Biol. Cell., 6, 97, 10.1091/mbc.6.1.97 · DOI
- 1992, J. Biol. Chem., 267, 17882, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)37125-X · DOI
- 2000, J. Neurosci., 20, 7325, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-19-07325.2000 · DOI
- 2001, Results Probl. Cell Differ., 32, 231, 10.1007/978-3-540-46560-7_16 · DOI
- 1999, Biochemistry., 38, 15166, 10.1021/bi991170v · DOI
- 1998, J. Biol. Chem, 273, 24592, 10.1074/jbc.273.38.24592 · DOI
- 1990, J. Cell Biol., 110, 1067, 10.1083/jcb.110.4.1067 · DOI
- 1999, Mol. Biol. Cell., 10, 713, 10.1091/mbc.10.3.713 · DOI
- 1981, J. Cell Biol., 90, 176, 10.1083/jcb.90.1.176 · DOI
- 1984, J. Cell Biol., 98, 457, 10.1083/jcb.98.2.457 · DOI
- 1987, J. Cell Biol., 105, 1473, 10.1083/jcb.105.4.1473 · DOI · Paper page
- 1987, FEBS Lett., 213, 316, 10.1016/0014-5793(87)81513-2 · DOI
- 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 93, 1391, 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1391 · DOI
- 2001, J. Cell Biol., 154, 1209, 10.1083/jcb.200106089 · DOI
- 1996, J. Neurosci., 16, 5443, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-17-05443.1996 · DOI
- 2001, Pharmacol. Rev., 53, 1
- 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 20922, 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20922 · DOI
- 1999, J. Cell Biol., 146, 755, 10.1083/jcb.146.4.755 · DOI
- 1999, EMBO J., 18, 871, 10.1093/emboj/18.4.871 · DOI
- 1999, Nat. Cell Biol., 1, 1, 10.1038/8971 · DOI
- 1985, Eur. J. Cell Biol, 38, 51
- 1997, Cell., 88, 767, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81923-6 · DOI
- 1996, Nature., 383, 447, 10.1038/383447a0 · DOI
- 1989, J. Cell Biol., 108, 389, 10.1083/jcb.108.2.389 · DOI
- 1995, J. Immunol., 154, 5391, 10.4049/jimmunol.154.10.5391 · DOI
- 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 927, 10.1038/ncb1001-927 · DOI
- 2001, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 13, 470, 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00238-6 · DOI
- 1991, FEBS Lett., 289, 47, 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80905-I · DOI
- 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 7950, 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)89541-6 · DOI
- 1981, J. Cell Biol., 256, 2538
- 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 28356, 10.1074/jbc.M102235200 · DOI
- 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 15011, 10.1074/jbc.272.23.15011 · DOI
- 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 32507, 10.1074/jbc.272.51.32507 · DOI
- 1996, Nature., 382, 177, 10.1038/382177a0 · DOI
- 1997, J. Biol. Chem, 272, 20332, 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20332 · DOI
- 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 23120, 10.1074/jbc.M002581200 · DOI
- 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 96, 3712, 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3712 · DOI
- 1999, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 11, 177, 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)80023-4 · DOI
- 1986, Pancreas., 1, 110, 10.1097/00006676-198603000-00002 · DOI
- 2001, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 13, 139, 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00190-3 · DOI
- 2000, Biochemistry., 39, 12828, 10.1021/bi0010928 · DOI
- 2001, Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1535, 236, 10.1016/S0925-4439(01)00028-X · DOI
- 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 214, 10.1074/jbc.270.1.214 · DOI
- 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 34616, 10.1074/jbc.273.51.34616 · DOI
- 2001, Oncogene., 20, 1532, 10.1038/sj.onc.1204184 · DOI
- 1987, J. Cell Biol., 104, 887, 10.1083/jcb.104.4.887 · DOI
- 1988, J. Cell. Biochem., 36, 73, 10.1002/jcb.240360108 · DOI
- 1993, J. Biol. Chem., 268, 22716, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)41586-4 · DOI
- 1996, J. Cell Biol., 132, 1025, 10.1083/jcb.132.6.1025 · DOI
- 1998, Mol. Biol. Cell., 9, 1177, 10.1091/mbc.9.5.1177 · DOI
- 2000, J. Cell Sci., 113, 2463, 10.1242/jcs.113.13.2463 · DOI
- 1998, Science., 281, 821, 10.1126/science.281.5378.821 · DOI
- 1985, J. Cell. Physiol., 123, 167, 10.1002/jcp.1041230204 · DOI
- 1989, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton., 13, 127, 10.1002/cm.970130302 · DOI · Paper page
- 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 17056, 10.1074/jbc.273.27.17056 · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, Cell., 96, 677, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80578-4 · DOI
- 1996, J. Cell Biol., 135, 635, 10.1083/jcb.135.3.635 · DOI
- 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 17468, 10.1074/jbc.M010893200 · DOI
- 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 1564, 10.1074/jbc.270.4.1564 · DOI
- 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 27005, 10.1074/jbc.272.43.27005 · DOI
- 1999, Science., 283, 650, 10.1126/science.283.5402.650 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Disabled‐2 exhibits the properties of a cargo‐selective endocytic clathrin adaptor
Mishra, S. K., Keyel, P. A., Hawryluk, M. J., Agostinelli, N. R., Watkins, S. C., & Traub, L. M. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf487 · Cited by 302
Lu, J., Helton, T. D., Blanpied, T. A., Rácz, B., Newpher, T. M., Weinberg, R. J., & Ehlers, M. D. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.041 · Cited by 273
Focusing on clathrin-mediated endocytosis.
Rappoport, J. Z. (2008) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20080474 · Cited by 172
Keyel, P. A., Mishra, S. K., Roth, R., Heuser, J. E., Watkins, S. C., & Traub, L. M. (2006) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e06-05-0421 · Cited by 134
Gong, Q., Weide, M., Huntsman, C., Xu, Z., Jan, L. Y., & Ma, D. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m700767200 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Santini, F., Gaidarov, I., & Keen, J. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2002-02-11
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 665-676
- ISSN
- 1540-8140
- 0021-9525
- PMC
- PMC2174075
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review