Cited by 96

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

G protein–coupled receptor/arrestin3 modulation of the endocytic machinery

Santini, Francesca, Gaidarov, Ibragim, Keen, James H.·2002·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Nonvisual arrestins (arr) modulate G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) desensitization and internalization and bind to both clathrin (CL) and AP-2 components of the endocytic coated pit (CP). This raises the possibility that endocytosis of some GPCRs may be a consequence of arr-induced de novo CP formation. To directly test this hypothesis, we examined the behavior of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-arr3 in live cells expressing β2-adrenergic receptors and fluorescent CL. After agonist stimulation, the diffuse GFP-arr3 signal rapidly became punctate and colocalized virtually completely with preexisting CP spots, demonstrating that activated complexes accumulate in previously formed CPs rather than nucleating new CP formation. After arr3 recruitment, CP appeared larger: electron microscopy analysis revealed an increase in both CP number and in the occurrence of clustered CPs. Mutant arr3 proteins with impaired binding to CL or AP-2 displayed reduced recruitment to CPs, but were still capable of inducing CP clustering. In contrast, though constitutively present in CPs, the COOH-terminal moiety of arr3, which contains CP binding sites but lacks receptor binding, did not induce CP clustering. Together, these results indicate that recruitment of functional arr3–GPCR complexes to CP is necessary to induce clustering. Latrunculin B or 16°C blocked CP rearrangements without affecting arr3 recruitment to CP. These results and earlier studies suggest that discrete CP zones exist on cell surfaces, each capable of supporting adjacent CPs, and that the cortical actin membrane skeleton is intimately involved with both the maintenance of existing CPs and the generation of new structures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200110132

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beta-arrestin appears to accompany heptahelical receptors into existing coated buds.

    “This distinguishes this group of proteins from b-arrestin, which, despite also containing PtdIns(4,5)P 2 -, AP-2-and clathrinbinding determinants, appears to accompany heptahelical receptors into existing coated buds (Santini et al., 2002;Scott et al., 2002).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 1990, J. Biol. Chem., 265, 745, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)40113-0 · DOI
  2. 1997, Eur. J. Immunol., 27, 1881, 10.1002/eji.1830270810 · DOI
  3. 1990, J. Immunol., 145, 3814, 10.4049/jimmunol.145.11.3814 · DOI
  4. 1995, Mol. Biol. Cell., 6, 97, 10.1091/mbc.6.1.97 · DOI
  5. 1992, J. Biol. Chem., 267, 17882, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)37125-X · DOI
  6. 2000, J. Neurosci., 20, 7325, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-19-07325.2000 · DOI
  7. 2001, Results Probl. Cell Differ., 32, 231, 10.1007/978-3-540-46560-7_16 · DOI
  8. 1999, Biochemistry., 38, 15166, 10.1021/bi991170v · DOI
  9. 1998, J. Biol. Chem, 273, 24592, 10.1074/jbc.273.38.24592 · DOI
  10. 1990, J. Cell Biol., 110, 1067, 10.1083/jcb.110.4.1067 · DOI
  11. 1999, Mol. Biol. Cell., 10, 713, 10.1091/mbc.10.3.713 · DOI
  12. 1981, J. Cell Biol., 90, 176, 10.1083/jcb.90.1.176 · DOI
  13. 1984, J. Cell Biol., 98, 457, 10.1083/jcb.98.2.457 · DOI
  14. 1987, J. Cell Biol., 105, 1473, 10.1083/jcb.105.4.1473 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 1987, FEBS Lett., 213, 316, 10.1016/0014-5793(87)81513-2 · DOI
  16. 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 93, 1391, 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1391 · DOI
  17. 2001, J. Cell Biol., 154, 1209, 10.1083/jcb.200106089 · DOI
  18. 1996, J. Neurosci., 16, 5443, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-17-05443.1996 · DOI
  19. 2001, Pharmacol. Rev., 53, 1
  20. 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 20922, 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20922 · DOI
  21. 1999, J. Cell Biol., 146, 755, 10.1083/jcb.146.4.755 · DOI
  22. 1999, EMBO J., 18, 871, 10.1093/emboj/18.4.871 · DOI
  23. 1999, Nat. Cell Biol., 1, 1, 10.1038/8971 · DOI
  24. 1985, Eur. J. Cell Biol, 38, 51
  25. 1997, Cell., 88, 767, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81923-6 · DOI
  26. 1996, Nature., 383, 447, 10.1038/383447a0 · DOI
  27. 1989, J. Cell Biol., 108, 389, 10.1083/jcb.108.2.389 · DOI
  28. 1995, J. Immunol., 154, 5391, 10.4049/jimmunol.154.10.5391 · DOI
  29. 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 927, 10.1038/ncb1001-927 · DOI
  30. 2001, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 13, 470, 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00238-6 · DOI
  31. 1991, FEBS Lett., 289, 47, 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80905-I · DOI
  32. 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 7950, 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)89541-6 · DOI
  33. 1981, J. Cell Biol., 256, 2538
  34. 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 28356, 10.1074/jbc.M102235200 · DOI
  35. 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 15011, 10.1074/jbc.272.23.15011 · DOI
  36. 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 32507, 10.1074/jbc.272.51.32507 · DOI
  37. 1996, Nature., 382, 177, 10.1038/382177a0 · DOI
  38. 1997, J. Biol. Chem, 272, 20332, 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20332 · DOI
  39. 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 23120, 10.1074/jbc.M002581200 · DOI
  40. 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 96, 3712, 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3712 · DOI
  41. 1999, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 11, 177, 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)80023-4 · DOI
  42. 1986, Pancreas., 1, 110, 10.1097/00006676-198603000-00002 · DOI
  43. 2001, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 13, 139, 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00190-3 · DOI
  44. 2000, Biochemistry., 39, 12828, 10.1021/bi0010928 · DOI
  45. 2001, Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1535, 236, 10.1016/S0925-4439(01)00028-X · DOI
  46. 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 214, 10.1074/jbc.270.1.214 · DOI
  47. 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 34616, 10.1074/jbc.273.51.34616 · DOI
  48. 2001, Oncogene., 20, 1532, 10.1038/sj.onc.1204184 · DOI
  49. 1987, J. Cell Biol., 104, 887, 10.1083/jcb.104.4.887 · DOI
  50. 1988, J. Cell. Biochem., 36, 73, 10.1002/jcb.240360108 · DOI
  51. 1993, J. Biol. Chem., 268, 22716, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)41586-4 · DOI
  52. 1996, J. Cell Biol., 132, 1025, 10.1083/jcb.132.6.1025 · DOI
  53. 1998, Mol. Biol. Cell., 9, 1177, 10.1091/mbc.9.5.1177 · DOI
  54. 2000, J. Cell Sci., 113, 2463, 10.1242/jcs.113.13.2463 · DOI
  55. 1998, Science., 281, 821, 10.1126/science.281.5378.821 · DOI
  56. 1985, J. Cell. Physiol., 123, 167, 10.1002/jcp.1041230204 · DOI
  57. 1989, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton., 13, 127, 10.1002/cm.970130302 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 17056, 10.1074/jbc.273.27.17056 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 1999, Cell., 96, 677, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80578-4 · DOI
  60. 1996, J. Cell Biol., 135, 635, 10.1083/jcb.135.3.635 · DOI
  61. 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 17468, 10.1074/jbc.M010893200 · DOI
  62. 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 1564, 10.1074/jbc.270.4.1564 · DOI
  63. 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 27005, 10.1074/jbc.272.43.27005 · DOI
  64. 1999, Science., 283, 650, 10.1126/science.283.5402.650 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Santini, F., Gaidarov, I., & Keen, J. H.
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2002-02-11
Volume
156
Issue
4
Pages
665-676
ISSN
  • 1540-8140
  • 0021-9525
Cited by
96
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review