Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Grd19/Snx3p functions as a cargo-specific adapter for retromer-dependent endocytic recycling

Strochlic, Todd I., Setty, Thanuja Gangi, Sitaram, Anand, Burd, Christopher G.·2007·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Amajor function of the endocytic system is the sorting of cargo to various organelles. Endocytic sorting of the yeast reductive iron transporter, which is composed of the Fet3 and Ftr1 proteins, is regulated by available iron. When iron is provided to iron-starved cells, Fet3p–Ftr1p is targeted to the lysosome-like vacuole and degraded. In contrast, when iron is not available, Fet3p–Ftr1p is maintained on the plasma membrane via an endocytic recycling pathway requiring the sorting nexin Grd19/Snx3p, the pentameric retromer complex, and the Ypt6p Golgi Rab GTPase module. A recycling signal in Ftr1p was identified and found to bind directly to Grd19/Snx3p. Retromer and Grd19/Snx3p partially colocalize to tubular endosomes, where they are physically associated. After export from the endosome, Fet3p–Ftr1p transits through the Golgi apparatus for resecretion. Thus, Grd19/Snx3p, functions as a cargo-specific adapter for the retromer complex, establishing a precedent for a mechanism by which sorting nexins expand the repertoire of retromer-dependent cargos.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200609161

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SNX3 directly binds to a subset of cargo containing the sequence motif [+/-]-x-∅-x-[L/M], with many of these cargoes trafficked through the retrograde endosome-to-TGN pathway.

    “SNX3 directly binds to a subset of cargo containing the poorly defined sequence motif [+/-]-x-∅-x-[L/M] (∅ -bulky aromatic residue) with many of these cargoes trafficked through the retrograde endosome-to-TGN pathway [25,30,66,67].”

    From Global identification of neuronal and astrocytic integral membrane proteins that require Retromer for their endosomal recycling (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results section reports that Grd19p, the yeast SNX3 homologue, directly binds the Ftr1p recycling signal; the Discussion also identifies cargo sorted through the Grd19p–retromer pathway, including proteins retrieved to the Golgi. But the Discussion does not establish the claimed sequence motif. It says the signals appear diverse, a phenylalanine mutation did not affect Ftr1p recycling, and Grd19p probably recognizes structural features rather than a strict linear sequence. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The SNX3-Retromer assembly is essential for the sequence-dependent retrieval and recycling of cargoes.

    “An additional cargo adaptor complex essential for the sequence-dependent retrieval and recycling of cargoes is the sorting nexin-3 (SNX3)-Retromer assembly [25,30,66,67].”
  • Retromer associates with accessory proteins and cargo adaptors including sorting nexins, the WASH complex, RAB GTPase regulators including TBC1D5 and ANKRD27/VARP, and RME8.

    “To function, Retromer associates with accessory proteins and cargo adaptors including sorting nexins (SNXs) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], the WASH complex [35][36][37][38][39], RAB GTPase regulators including TBC1D5 and ANKRD27/VARP [40][41][42][43][44][45][46], and RME8 [47].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 2004, J. Cell Biol., 165, 123, 10.1083/jcb.200312055 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 1994, Cell., 76, 403, 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90346-8 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2001, Mol. Biol. Cell., 12, 13, 10.1091/mbc.12.1.13 · DOI
  4. 2004, Mol. Biol. Cell., 15, 883, 10.1091/mbc.e03-04-0202 · DOI
  5. 2006, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 7, 568, 10.1038/nrm1985 · DOI
  6. 2004, Curr. Biol., 14, 1791, 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.077 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2005, Traffic., 6, 75, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00260.x · DOI
  8. 2005, Curr. Biol., 15, R819, 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.012 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2005, J. Cell Sci., 118, 4527, 10.1242/jcs.02568 · DOI
  10. 1995, Mol. Biol. Cell., 6, 1089, 10.1091/mbc.6.9.1089 · DOI
  11. 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 99, 14837, 10.1073/pnas.232591899 · DOI
  12. 2005, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 12, 594, 10.1038/nsmb954 · DOI
  13. 2002, Methods Enzymol., 351, 408, 10.1016/S0076-6879(02)51861-9 · DOI
  14. 1996, J. Cell Biol., 133, 529, 10.1083/jcb.133.3.529 · DOI
  15. 2006, Science., 312, 921, 10.1126/science.1124856 · DOI
  16. 2006, Biochem. J., 398, 399, 10.1042/BJ20060033 · DOI
  17. 1995, Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 1671, 10.1128/MCB.15.3.1671 · DOI
  18. 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 22181, 10.1074/jbc.M414663200 · DOI
  19. 2001, Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 3105, 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3105-3117.2001 · DOI
  20. 2006, Nat. Cell Biol., 8, 657, 10.1038/ncb1419 · DOI
  21. 1987, J. Cell Biol., 104, 1715, 10.1083/jcb.104.6.1715 · DOI
  22. 2000, Mol. Biol. Cell., 11, 4105, 10.1091/mbc.11.12.4105 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 1983, Trends Biochem. Sci., 78, 245
  24. 2003, EMBO J., 22, 548, 10.1093/emboj/cdg062 · DOI
  25. 1997, Mol. Biol. Cell., 8, 1529, 10.1091/mbc.8.8.1529 · DOI
  26. 2003, Traffic., 4, 201, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2004.00071.x · DOI
  27. 2000, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 12, 457, 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00117-4 · DOI
  28. 2000, Mol. Biol. Cell., 11, 23, 10.1091/mbc.11.1.23 · DOI
  29. 1998, Yeast., 14, 953, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10<953::AID-YEA293>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
  30. 1994, Cell., 77, 579, 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90219-4 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 1986, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 83, 2899, 10.1073/pnas.83.9.2899 · DOI
  32. 2004, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 5, 121
  33. 1993, Yeast., 9, 715, 10.1002/yea.320090705 · DOI
  34. 1997, J. Cell Sci., 110, 1063, 10.1242/jcs.110.9.1063 · DOI
  35. 1999, Mol. Biol. Cell., 10, 875, 10.1091/mbc.10.4.875 · DOI
  36. 2000, J. Cell Biol., 151, 297, 10.1083/jcb.151.2.297 · DOI
  37. 2006, Development., 133, 1757, 10.1242/dev.02357 · DOI
  38. 1998, Mol. Biol. Cell., 9, 173, 10.1091/mbc.9.1.173 · DOI
  39. 2006, Mol. Biol. Cell., 17, 1859, 10.1091/mbc.e05-11-1002 · DOI
  40. 2006, Mol. Biol. Cell., 17, 3031, 10.1091/mbc.e05-07-0669 · DOI
  41. 2004, Mol. Biol. Cell., 15, 1417, 10.1091/mbc.e03-10-0765 · DOI
  42. 2004, J. Cell Biol., 165, 111, 10.1083/jcb.200312034 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2005, Trends Cell Biol., 15, 68, 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 2002, Mol. Biol. Cell., 13, 2826, 10.1091/mbc.02-05-0064 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 1997, J. Cell Biol., 137, 79, 10.1083/jcb.137.1.79 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 1998, J. Cell Biol., 142, 665, 10.1083/jcb.142.3.665 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 2006, Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1761, 878, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.04.011 · DOI
  48. 2003, Curr. Biol., 13, 401, 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00089-7 · DOI
  49. 2004, Biochem. J., 380, 487, 10.1042/bj20031921 · DOI
  50. 2004, Yeast., 21, 661, 10.1002/yea.1130 · DOI
  51. 2006, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 13, 540, 10.1038/nsmb1103 · DOI
  52. 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 13355, 10.1074/jbc.M512042200 · DOI
  53. 2000, EMBO J., 19, 4885, 10.1093/emboj/19.18.4885 · DOI
  54. 2001, Biochem. J., 358, 7, 10.1042/bj3580007 · DOI
  55. 2004, Nat. Cell Biol., 6, 763, 10.1038/ncb1153 · DOI
  56. 1998, J. Cell Biol., 140, 577, 10.1083/jcb.140.3.577 · DOI
  57. 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 22962, 10.1074/jbc.M500464200 · DOI
  58. 2002, Mol. Biol. Cell., 13, 1965, 10.1091/mbc.e01-11-0131 · DOI
  59. 2002, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 3, 919
  60. 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 658, 10.1038/35083051 · DOI
  61. 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 44179, 10.1074/jbc.M108811200 · DOI
  62. 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 99, 6767, 10.1073/pnas.092142699 · DOI
  63. 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 50371, 10.1074/jbc.M304392200 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Strochlic, T. I., Setty, T. G., Sitaram, A., & Burd, C. G.
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2007-04-09
Volume
177
Issue
1
Pages
115-125
ISSN
  • 1540-8140
  • 0021-9525
Cited by
165
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review