The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grd19/Snx3p functions as a cargo-specific adapter for retromer-dependent endocytic recycling
Abstract
Amajor function of the endocytic system is the sorting of cargo to various organelles. Endocytic sorting of the yeast reductive iron transporter, which is composed of the Fet3 and Ftr1 proteins, is regulated by available iron. When iron is provided to iron-starved cells, Fet3p–Ftr1p is targeted to the lysosome-like vacuole and degraded. In contrast, when iron is not available, Fet3p–Ftr1p is maintained on the plasma membrane via an endocytic recycling pathway requiring the sorting nexin Grd19/Snx3p, the pentameric retromer complex, and the Ypt6p Golgi Rab GTPase module. A recycling signal in Ftr1p was identified and found to bind directly to Grd19/Snx3p. Retromer and Grd19/Snx3p partially colocalize to tubular endosomes, where they are physically associated. After export from the endosome, Fet3p–Ftr1p transits through the Golgi apparatus for resecretion. Thus, Grd19/Snx3p, functions as a cargo-specific adapter for the retromer complex, establishing a precedent for a mechanism by which sorting nexins expand the repertoire of retromer-dependent cargos.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SNX3 directly binds to a subset of cargo containing the sequence motif [+/-]-x-∅-x-[L/M], with many of these cargoes trafficked through the retrograde endosome-to-TGN pathway.
“SNX3 directly binds to a subset of cargo containing the poorly defined sequence motif [+/-]-x-∅-x-[L/M] (∅ -bulky aromatic residue) with many of these cargoes trafficked through the retrograde endosome-to-TGN pathway [25,30,66,67].”
From Global identification of neuronal and astrocytic integral membrane proteins that require Retromer for their endosomal recycling (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
The Results section reports that Grd19p, the yeast SNX3 homologue, directly binds the Ftr1p recycling signal; the Discussion also identifies cargo sorted through the Grd19p–retromer pathway, including proteins retrieved to the Golgi. But the Discussion does not establish the claimed sequence motif. It says the signals appear diverse, a phenylalanine mutation did not affect Ftr1p recycling, and Grd19p probably recognizes structural features rather than a strict linear sequence. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe SNX3-Retromer assembly is essential for the sequence-dependent retrieval and recycling of cargoes.
“An additional cargo adaptor complex essential for the sequence-dependent retrieval and recycling of cargoes is the sorting nexin-3 (SNX3)-Retromer assembly [25,30,66,67].”
From Global identification of neuronal and astrocytic integral membrane proteins that require Retromer for their endosomal recycling (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
Retromer associates with accessory proteins and cargo adaptors including sorting nexins, the WASH complex, RAB GTPase regulators including TBC1D5 and ANKRD27/VARP, and RME8.
“To function, Retromer associates with accessory proteins and cargo adaptors including sorting nexins (SNXs) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], the WASH complex [35][36][37][38][39], RAB GTPase regulators including TBC1D5 and ANKRD27/VARP [40][41][42][43][44][45][46], and RME8 [47].”
From Global identification of neuronal and astrocytic integral membrane proteins that require Retromer for their endosomal recycling (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A permease-oxidase complex involved in high-affinity iron uptake in yeast.
Stearman, R., Yuan, D. S., Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y., Klausner, R. D., & Dancis, A. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5255.1552 · Cited by 683
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- 2004, J. Cell Biol., 165, 123, 10.1083/jcb.200312055 · DOI · Paper page
- 1994, Cell., 76, 403, 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90346-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 2001, Mol. Biol. Cell., 12, 13, 10.1091/mbc.12.1.13 · DOI
- 2004, Mol. Biol. Cell., 15, 883, 10.1091/mbc.e03-04-0202 · DOI
- 2006, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 7, 568, 10.1038/nrm1985 · DOI
- 2004, Curr. Biol., 14, 1791, 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.077 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Traffic., 6, 75, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00260.x · DOI
- 2005, Curr. Biol., 15, R819, 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, J. Cell Sci., 118, 4527, 10.1242/jcs.02568 · DOI
- 1995, Mol. Biol. Cell., 6, 1089, 10.1091/mbc.6.9.1089 · DOI
- 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 99, 14837, 10.1073/pnas.232591899 · DOI
- 2005, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 12, 594, 10.1038/nsmb954 · DOI
- 2002, Methods Enzymol., 351, 408, 10.1016/S0076-6879(02)51861-9 · DOI
- 1996, J. Cell Biol., 133, 529, 10.1083/jcb.133.3.529 · DOI
- 2006, Science., 312, 921, 10.1126/science.1124856 · DOI
- 2006, Biochem. J., 398, 399, 10.1042/BJ20060033 · DOI
- 1995, Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 1671, 10.1128/MCB.15.3.1671 · DOI
- 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 22181, 10.1074/jbc.M414663200 · DOI
- 2001, Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 3105, 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3105-3117.2001 · DOI
- 2006, Nat. Cell Biol., 8, 657, 10.1038/ncb1419 · DOI
- 1987, J. Cell Biol., 104, 1715, 10.1083/jcb.104.6.1715 · DOI
- 2000, Mol. Biol. Cell., 11, 4105, 10.1091/mbc.11.12.4105 · DOI · Paper page
- 1983, Trends Biochem. Sci., 78, 245
- 2003, EMBO J., 22, 548, 10.1093/emboj/cdg062 · DOI
- 1997, Mol. Biol. Cell., 8, 1529, 10.1091/mbc.8.8.1529 · DOI
- 2003, Traffic., 4, 201, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2004.00071.x · DOI
- 2000, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 12, 457, 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00117-4 · DOI
- 2000, Mol. Biol. Cell., 11, 23, 10.1091/mbc.11.1.23 · DOI
- 1998, Yeast., 14, 953, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10<953::AID-YEA293>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
- 1994, Cell., 77, 579, 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90219-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 1986, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 83, 2899, 10.1073/pnas.83.9.2899 · DOI
- 2004, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 5, 121
- 1993, Yeast., 9, 715, 10.1002/yea.320090705 · DOI
- 1997, J. Cell Sci., 110, 1063, 10.1242/jcs.110.9.1063 · DOI
- 1999, Mol. Biol. Cell., 10, 875, 10.1091/mbc.10.4.875 · DOI
- 2000, J. Cell Biol., 151, 297, 10.1083/jcb.151.2.297 · DOI
- 2006, Development., 133, 1757, 10.1242/dev.02357 · DOI
- 1998, Mol. Biol. Cell., 9, 173, 10.1091/mbc.9.1.173 · DOI
- 2006, Mol. Biol. Cell., 17, 1859, 10.1091/mbc.e05-11-1002 · DOI
- 2006, Mol. Biol. Cell., 17, 3031, 10.1091/mbc.e05-07-0669 · DOI
- 2004, Mol. Biol. Cell., 15, 1417, 10.1091/mbc.e03-10-0765 · DOI
- 2004, J. Cell Biol., 165, 111, 10.1083/jcb.200312034 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Trends Cell Biol., 15, 68, 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, Mol. Biol. Cell., 13, 2826, 10.1091/mbc.02-05-0064 · DOI · Paper page
- 1997, J. Cell Biol., 137, 79, 10.1083/jcb.137.1.79 · DOI · Paper page
- 1998, J. Cell Biol., 142, 665, 10.1083/jcb.142.3.665 · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1761, 878, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.04.011 · DOI
- 2003, Curr. Biol., 13, 401, 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00089-7 · DOI
- 2004, Biochem. J., 380, 487, 10.1042/bj20031921 · DOI
- 2004, Yeast., 21, 661, 10.1002/yea.1130 · DOI
- 2006, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 13, 540, 10.1038/nsmb1103 · DOI
- 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 13355, 10.1074/jbc.M512042200 · DOI
- 2000, EMBO J., 19, 4885, 10.1093/emboj/19.18.4885 · DOI
- 2001, Biochem. J., 358, 7, 10.1042/bj3580007 · DOI
- 2004, Nat. Cell Biol., 6, 763, 10.1038/ncb1153 · DOI
- 1998, J. Cell Biol., 140, 577, 10.1083/jcb.140.3.577 · DOI
- 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 22962, 10.1074/jbc.M500464200 · DOI
- 2002, Mol. Biol. Cell., 13, 1965, 10.1091/mbc.e01-11-0131 · DOI
- 2002, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 3, 919
- 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 658, 10.1038/35083051 · DOI
- 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 44179, 10.1074/jbc.M108811200 · DOI
- 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 99, 6767, 10.1073/pnas.092142699 · DOI
- 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 50371, 10.1074/jbc.M304392200 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Retromer: A Master Conductor of Endosome Sorting
Burd, C., & Cullen, P. J. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016774 · Cited by 435
Self-citationEndosomal retrieval of cargo: Retromer is not alone
McNally, K. E., & Cullen, P. J. (2018) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2018.06.005 · Cited by 169
The Retromer Complex: From Genesis to Revelations
Seaman, M. N. J. (2021) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2020.12.009 · Cited by 104
Cellular and disease functions of the Prader–Willi Syndrome gene MAGEL2
Tacer, K. F., & Potts, P. R. (2017) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20160616 · Cited by 81
Sharma, V., Purushotham, R., & Kaur, R. (2016) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m116.751529 · Cited by 22
Mapping of endosomal proximity proteomes reveals Retromer as a hub for RAB GTPase regulation
Antón-Plágaro, C., Chen, K.-E., Guo, Q., Liu, M., Evans, A. J., Lewis, P. A., Heesom, K. J., Wilkinson, K. A., Collins, B. M., & Cullen, P. J. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61802-1 · Cited by 14
Jones, E., Adams, H., Chen, K.-E., Maroof, F., Ibbotson, T. M., Nakamura, Y., Banks, P. J., Healy, M. D., Lewis, P. A., Heesom, K. J., et al. (2026) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.14.724903
Metadata
- Authors
- Strochlic, T. I., Setty, T. G., Sitaram, A., & Burd, C. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2007-04-09
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-125
- ISSN
- 1540-8140
- 0021-9525
- PMC
- PMC2064116
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review