Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The interaction between the ER membrane protein UNC93B and TLR3, 7, and 9 is crucial for TLR signaling

Brinkmann, Melanie M., Spooner, Eric, Hoebe, Kasper, Beutler, Bruce, Ploegh, Hidde L., Kim, You-Me·2007·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) sense the presence of microbial and viral pathogens by signal transduction mechanisms that remain to be fully elucidated. A single point mutation (H412R) in the polytopic endoplasmic reticulum (ER)–resident membrane protein UNC93B abolishes signaling via TLR3, 7, and 9. We show that UNC93B specifically interacts with TLR3, 7, 9, and 13, whereas introduction of the point mutation H412R in UNC93B abolishes their interactions. We establish the physical interaction of the intracellular TLRs with UNC93B in splenocytes and bone marrow–derived dendritic cells. Further, by expressing chimeric TLRs, we show that TLR3 and 9 bind to UNC93B via their transmembrane domains. We propose that a physical association between UNC93B and TLRs in the ER is essential for proper TLR signaling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200612056

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 2005, Nat. Immunol., 6, 107, 10.1038/ni1147 · DOI
  2. 2006, Immunity., 25, 607, 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.08.017 · DOI
  3. 2002, Eur. J. Immunol., 32, 1958, 10.1002/1521-4141(200207)32:7<1958::AID-IMMU1958>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
  4. 2006, Nat. Immunol., 7, 49, 10.1038/ni1280 · DOI
  5. 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 98, 9237, 10.1073/pnas.161293498 · DOI
  6. 2006, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 24, 353, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090552 · DOI
  7. 2006, Science., 314, 308, 10.1126/science.1128346 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2003, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 13, 412, 10.1016/S0959-440X(03)00102-7 · DOI
  9. 2003, J. Neurosci., 23, 9133, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09133.2003 · DOI
  10. 2004, Int. Immunol., 16, 1143, 10.1093/intimm/dxh115 · DOI
  11. 1980, Genetics., 96, 147, 10.1093/genetics/96.1.147 · DOI
  12. 2004, Science., 303, 1526, 10.1126/science.1093620 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2002, Nat. Immunol., 3, 196, 10.1038/ni758 · DOI
  14. 2003, Nature., 424, 743, 10.1038/nature01889 · DOI
  15. 2006, Nature., 440, 949, 10.1038/nature04641 · DOI
  16. 2005, Int. Immunol., 17, 45, 10.1093/intimm/dxh184 · DOI
  17. 2004, Nat. Immunol., 5, 987, 10.1038/ni1112 · DOI
  18. 2006, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 343, 578, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.014 · DOI
  19. 2002, Gene., 283, 209, 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00856-3 · DOI
  20. 2006, Cell Death Differ., 13, 816, 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401850 · DOI
  21. 1999, Immunity., 11, 115, 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80086-2 · DOI
  22. 2004, Nat. Immunol., 5, 190, 10.1038/ni1028 · DOI
  23. 2004, J. Immunol., 173, 1179, 10.4049/jimmunol.173.2.1179 · DOI
  24. 1992, J. Cell Biol., 117, 143, 10.1083/jcb.117.1.143 · DOI
  25. 2004, Nature., 429, 834, 10.1038/nature02592 · DOI
  26. 2002, BMC Genet., 3, 20
  27. 2005, J. Immunol., 174, 7066, 10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.7066 · DOI
  28. 2003, J. Immunol., 171, 3154, 10.4049/jimmunol.171.6.3154 · DOI
  29. 2002, Nat. Immunol., 3, 667, 10.1038/ni809 · DOI
  30. 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 19008, 10.1074/jbc.M311618200 · DOI
  31. 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 37107, 10.1074/jbc.M504951200 · DOI
  32. 2004, Proteins., 54, 648, 10.1002/prot.10611 · DOI
  33. 1998, Science., 282, 2085, 10.1126/science.282.5396.2085 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 891, 10.1038/ncb1001-891 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 2005, Genes Dev., 19, 2668, 10.1101/gad.1360605 · DOI
  36. 1999, J. Exp. Med., 189, 1777, 10.1084/jem.189.11.1777 · DOI
  37. 2006, Virol. J., 3, 26, 10.1186/1743-422X-3-26 · DOI
  38. 2002, Nature., 416, 750, 10.1038/nature736 · DOI
  39. 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 101, 3516, 10.1073/pnas.0400525101 · DOI
  40. 2006, Nat. Immunol., 7, 156
  41. 2003, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 21, 335, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141126 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brinkmann, M. M., Spooner, E., Hoebe, K., Beutler, B., Ploegh, H. L., & Kim, Y.-M.
Affiliations
  • 1Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142
  • 2Department of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2007-04-23
Volume
177
Issue
2
Pages
265-275
ISSN
  • 1540-8140
  • 0021-9525
Cited by
411
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review