Cited by 154Cell death mechanisms and regulationCancer-related Molecular PathwaysNF-κB Signaling Pathways

Model-based dissection of CD95 signaling dynamics reveals both a pro- and antiapoptotic role of c-FLIPL

Open access
Fricker, Nicolai, Beaudouin, Joel, Richter, Petra, Eils, Roland, Krammer, Peter H., Lavrik, Inna N.·2010·Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Cellular FADD-like interleukin-1β–converting enzyme inhibitory proteins (c-FLIPs; isoforms c-FLIP long [c-FLIPL], c-FLIP short [c-FLIPS], and c-FLIP Raji [c-FLIPR]) regulate caspase-8 activation and death receptor (DR)–induced apoptosis. In this study, using a combination of mathematical modeling, imaging, and quantitative Western blots, we present a new mathematical model describing caspase-8 activation in quantitative terms, which highlights the influence of c-FLIP proteins on this process directly at the CD95 death-inducing signaling complex. We quantitatively define how the stoichiometry of c-FLIP proteins determines sensitivity toward CD95-induced apoptosis. We show that c-FLIPL has a proapoptotic role only upon moderate expression in combination with strong receptor stimulation or in the presence of high amounts of one of the short c-FLIP isoforms, c-FLIPS or c-FLIPR. Our findings resolve the present controversial discussion on the function of c-FLIPL as a pro- or antiapoptotic protein in DR-mediated apoptosis and are important for understanding the regulation of CD95-induced apoptosis, where subtle differences in c-FLIP concentrations determine life or death of the cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.201002060

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fricker, N., Beaudouin, J., Richter, P., Eils, R., Krammer, P. H., & Lavrik, I. N.
Affiliations
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Division of Immunogenetics 1 and 2
Corresponding author
Lavrik, Inna N.
Venue
Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2010-08-09
Volume
190
Issue
3
Pages
377-389
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2089552619
Cited by
154
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
Keywords
c-FLIP, Fas, caspase-8 activation, death receptor signaling, apoptosis, stoichiometry, anti-apoptotic proteins, pro-apoptotic proteins
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, HeLa Cells, Humans, Models, Biological, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Apoptosis, fas Receptor, Protein Isoforms, Caspase 8, CASP8 and FADD-Like Apoptosis Regulating Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review