The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial relationships of microtubule-organizing centers and the contact area of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and target cells.
Open accessAbstract
Specific binding (conjugation) of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) to target cells (TC) is the first step in a multistage process ultimately resulting in dissolution of the TC and recycling of the CTL. We examined the position of the microtubule organizing center (MTOC) of immune CTL bound to specific TC. Immunofluorescence labeling of freshly prepared CTL-TC conjugates with tubulin antibodies indicated that the MTOC in essentially all conjugated CTL but not in the conjugated TC were oriented towards the intercellular contact site. This finding was corroborated by electron microscopy examination of CTL-TC conjugates fixed either immediately after conjugation or during the lytic process. Antibody-induced caps of membrane antigens of CTL such as H-2 and Thy 1, did not show a similar relationship to the MTOC. Incubation of CTL-TC conjugates, 10-15 min at room temperature, resulted in an apparent deterioration of the microtubular system of conjugated CTL. It is proposed that the CTL plasma membrane proximal to the MTOC is particularly active in forming stable intercellular contacts, resulting in CTL-TC conjugation, and that subsequent modulation of the microtubular system of the CTL may be related to the cytolytic response and to detachment of the effector cell.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Centrosome polarization delivers secretory granules to the immunological synapse
Stinchcombe, J. C., Majorovits, E., Bossi, G., Fuller, S., & Griffiths, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05071 · Cited by 599
Dustin, M. L. (2014) · Cancer Immunology Research · doi:10.1158/2326-6066.cir-14-0161 · Cited by 502
Microtubules and signal transduction
Gundersen, G. G., & Cook, T. A. (1999) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0955-0674(99)80010-6 · Cited by 407
Tuning immune responses: diversity and adaptation of the immunological synapse
Friedl, P., den Boer, A. T., & Gunzer, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1647 · Cited by 276
Nejmeddine, M., Negi, V. S., Mukherjee, S., Tanaka, Y., Orth, K., Taylor, G. P., & Bangham, C. R. M. (2009) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-03-136770 · Cited by 118
Barnard, A. L., Igakura, T., Tanaka, Y., Taylor, G. P., & Bangham, C. R. M. (2005) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2004-07-2850 · Cited by 114
Human T-Lymphotropic Virus-1 Visualized at the Virological Synapse by Electron Tomography
Majorovits, E., Nejmeddine, M., Tanaka, Y., Taylor, G. P., Fuller, S. D., & Bangham, C. R. M. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002251 · Cited by 110
Actin Dynamics at the T Cell Synapse as Revealed by Immune-Related Actinopathies
Dupré, L., Boztug, K., & Pfajfer, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.665519 · Cited by 64
LFA-1 Engagement Triggers T Cell Polarization at the HIV-1 Virological Synapse
Starling, S., & Jolly, C. (2016) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.01152-16 · Cited by 33
Secretion from myeloid cells: Secretory lysosomes
Griffiths, G. M. (2016) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.mchd-0030-2016 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Geiger, B., Rosen, D., & Berke, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1982-10-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 137-143
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2063372301
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.