Cited by 259Gut microbiota and healthAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaEscherichia coli research studies

Inhibiting antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae by microbiota-mediated intracellular acidification

Open access
Sorbara, Matthew T., Dubin, Krista, Littmann, Eric R., Moody, Thomas U., Fontana, Emily, Seok, Ruth, Leiner, Ingrid M., Taur, Ying +8 more·2019·Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and other members of the Enterobacteriaceae family are common human pathogens that have acquired broad antibiotic resistance, rendering infection by some strains virtually untreatable. Enterobacteriaceae are intestinal residents, but generally represent <1% of the adult colonic microbiota. Antibiotic-mediated destruction of the microbiota enables Enterobacteriaceae to expand to high densities in the colon, markedly increasing the risk of bloodstream invasion, sepsis, and death. Here, we demonstrate that an antibiotic-naive microbiota suppresses growth of antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Proteus mirabilis by acidifying the proximal colon and triggering short chain fatty acid (SCFA)–mediated intracellular acidification. High concentrations of SCFAs and the acidic environment counter the competitive edge that O2 and NO3 respiration confer upon Enterobacteriaceae during expansion. Reestablishment of a microbiota that produces SCFAs enhances clearance of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Proteus mirabilis from the intestinal lumen and represents a potential therapeutic approach to enhance clearance of antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.20181639

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enterobacteriaceae expansion in the gut significantly increases the risk of bloodstream invasion, sepsis, and death.

    “Moreover, Enterobacteriaceae expansion in the gut significantly increases the risk of bloodstream invasion, sepsis, and death (28).”
  • Nonionized SCFAs can diffuse across the bacterial membrane and into the cytoplasm, where they dissociate into their ionized forms, lowering the intracellular pH and inhibiting the growth of susceptible bacteria, including antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

    “For example, nonionized SCFAs can diffuse across the bacterial membrane and into the cytoplasm, where they dissociate into their ionized forms, lowering the intracellular pH and inhibiting the growth of susceptible bacteria, including antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae [37].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sorbara, M. T., Dubin, K., Littmann, E. R., Moody, T. U., Fontana, E., Seok, R., Leiner, I. M., Taur, Y., Peled, J. U., van den Brink, M. R. M., Litvak, Y., Bäumler, A. J., Chaubard, J.-L., Pickard, A. J., Cross, J. R., & Pamer, E. G.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 4
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sorbara, Matthew T.
  • Pamer, Eric G.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2018-12-18
Volume
216
Issue
1
Pages
84-98
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2904430902
Cited by
259
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 11
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Experimental Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Canadian Institute of Health Research (FRN#152527)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 AI042135, AI095706, U01 AI124275, P30 CA008748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
Keywords
Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, intracellular acidification, antibiotic-induced microbiota depletion, bacterial clearance, sepsis, nitrate respiration, oxygen respiration
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Colon, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Fatty Acids, Female, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Male, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review