Cited by 135Pancreatic function and diabetesCellular transport and secretionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regulated Exocytosis of GABA-containing Synaptic-like Microvesicles in Pancreatic β-cells

Open access

Abstract

We have explored whether γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is released by regulated exocytosis of GABA-containing synaptic-like microvesicles (SLMVs) in insulin-releasing rat pancreatic β-cells. To this end, β-cells were engineered to express GABAA-receptor Cl−-channels at high density using adenoviral infection. Electron microscopy indicated that the average diameter of the SLMVs is 90 nm, that every β-cell contains ∼3,500 such vesicles, and that insulin-containing large dense core vesicles exclude GABA. Quantal release of GABA, seen as rapidly activating and deactivating Cl−-currents, was observed during membrane depolarizations from −70 mV to voltages beyond −40 mV or when Ca2+ was dialysed into the cell interior. Depolarization-evoked GABA release was suppressed when Ca2+ entry was inhibited using Cd2+. Analysis of the kinetics of GABA release revealed that GABA-containing vesicles can be divided into a readily releasable pool and a reserve pool. Simultaneous measurements of GABA release and cell capacitance indicated that exocytosis of SLMVs contributes ∼1% of the capacitance signal. Mathematical analysis of the release events suggests that every SLMV contains 0.36 amol of GABA. We conclude that there are two parallel pathways of exocytosis in pancreatic β-cells and that release of GABA may accordingly be temporally and spatially separated from insulin secretion. This provides a basis for paracrine GABAergic signaling within the islet.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1085/jgp.200308966

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Localization of GABA and β-cell ultrastructure. (A) Electron micrograph of a rat pancreatic islet. Three docked insulin-containing LDCVs and two docked GABA-containing SLMVs have been highlighted by the black and white arrows, respectively. Bar, 250 nm. (B) Diameters of SLMVs and LDCVs in rat pancreatic β-cells. Two Gaussians have been approximated to the distribution of the profile diameters of the SLMVs and LDCVs. (C) Immunofluorescence micrograph of β-cells maintained in tissue culture for 24 h using specific antibodies against insulin (red, left) and GABA (green, right). Note the low GABA content of some β-cells (indicated by arrows). Bar, 5 μm. (D) Immunogold labeling of GABA in a β-cell in an intact islet. Bar, 500 nm.
Figure 1. Localization of GABA and β-cell ultrastructure. (A) Electron micrograph of a rat pancreatic islet. Three docked insulin-containing LDCVs and two docked GABA-containing SLMVs have been highlighted by the black and white arrows, respectively. Bar, 250 nm. (B) Diameters of SLMVs and LDCVs in rat pancreatic β-cells. Two Gaussians have been approximated to the distribution of the profile diameters of the SLMVs and LDCVs. (C) Immunofluorescence micrograph of β-cells maintained in tissue culture for 24 h using specific antibodies against insulin (red, left) and GABA (green, right). Note the low GABA content of some β-cells (indicated by arrows). Bar, 5 μm. (D) Immunogold labeling of GABA in a β-cell in an intact islet. Bar, 500 nm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Overexpression of GABAA receptors in β-cells. (A) Western blot of homogenates of rat islet cells (∼150 islets) infected or not with the adenoviral constructs encoding the GABAA-receptor Cl− channels, using an antibody against the α1 subunit (top), and the corresponding densitograms (below). The bands in the noninfected samples may correspond to endogenous α1 subunits in non-β-cells. (B) Immunofluorescence micrograph of a β-cell infected with the adenoviral constructs using antibodies against the α1 subunit of the GABAA receptor (green) and insulin (red). Bar, 5 μm. (C) Inward current activated in an infected β-cell by rapid application of GABA (1 mM) to the bath solution. (D) Relationship between the GABA concentration and the peak amplitude of the Cl−-current responses. The current responses have been normalized to the maximum peak current (usually observed in response to 1 mM GABA). All concentrations were tested in the same cell. Data are mean values ± SEM of five experiments. The Hill equation was approximated to the data points giving a Kd of 30 μM.
Figure 2. Overexpression of GABAA receptors in β-cells. (A) Western blot of homogenates of rat islet cells (∼150 islets) infected or not with the adenoviral constructs encoding the GABAA-receptor Cl− channels, using an antibody against the α1 subunit (top), and the corresponding densitograms (below). The bands in the noninfected samples may correspond to endogenous α1 subunits in non-β-cells. (B) Immunofluorescence micrograph of a β-cell infected with the adenoviral constructs using antibodies against the α1 subunit of the GABAA receptor (green) and insulin (red). Bar, 5 μm. (C) Inward current activated in an infected β-cell by rapid application of GABA (1 mM) to the bath solution. (D) Relationship between the GABA concentration and the peak amplitude of the Cl−-current responses. The current responses have been normalized to the maximum peak current (usually observed in response to 1 mM GABA). All concentrations were tested in the same cell. Data are mean values ± SEM of five experiments. The Hill equation was approximated to the data points giving a Kd of 30 μM.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Quantal release of GABA. (A) Current trace (overlay of six sweeps) from an infected β-cell infused with pipette solution containing 3 mM free Ca2+ at −70 mV holding potential. Cl− current spikes, corresponding to spontaneous release of GABA-containing vesicles, are superimposed on the background current. (B) Recording from another cell under the same experimental conditions as in A before (top) and after (middle) addition of the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline to the bath solution and after washout of the antagonist (bottom; each trace corresponds to five superimposed sweeps).
Figure 3. Quantal release of GABA. (A) Current trace (overlay of six sweeps) from an infected β-cell infused with pipette solution containing 3 mM free Ca2+ at −70 mV holding potential. Cl− current spikes, corresponding to spontaneous release of GABA-containing vesicles, are superimposed on the background current. (B) Recording from another cell under the same experimental conditions as in A before (top) and after (middle) addition of the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline to the bath solution and after washout of the antagonist (bottom; each trace corresponds to five superimposed sweeps).CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Properties of quantal GABA release. (A, left) Two transient currents illustrating the variability of the current amplitudes. (Right) Amplitude-corrected overlay the first (red) and second (black) transient current from the left panel, demonstrating the similarity in current kinetics. (B) Rise time (10–90%) displayed against current amplitude. (C) Duration (half widths) of current transients displayed against current amplitude. For display purposes, the data presented in B an C are presented as mean values ± SEM of 10 amplitude-matched responses. (D) Distribution of the cubic roots of transient current amplitudes (\documentclass[10pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pmc} \usepackage[Euler]{upgreek} \pagestyle{empty} \oddsidemargin -1.0in \begin{document} \begin{equation*} \root{3} \of {{\mathit{I}}}\end{equation*}\end{document}) of the same events as in those presented in A–C. A Gaussian fit is superimposed (N = number of events). (E) Experimentally measured GABA-activated Cl−-current transient (mean of 12 events; continuous line) and current response obtained by mathematical modelling (circles).
Figure 4. Properties of quantal GABA release. (A, left) Two transient currents illustrating the variability of the current amplitudes. (Right) Amplitude-corrected overlay the first (red) and second (black) transient current from the left panel, demonstrating the similarity in current kinetics. (B) Rise time (10–90%) displayed against current amplitude. (C) Duration (half widths) of current transients displayed against current amplitude. For display purposes, the data presented in B an C are presented as mean values ± SEM of 10 amplitude-matched responses. (D) Distribution of the cubic roots of transient current amplitudes (\documentclass[10pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pmc} \usepackage[Euler]{upgreek} \pagestyle{empty} \oddsidemargin -1.0in \begin{document} \begin{equation*} \root{3} \of {{\mathit{I}}}\end{equation*}\end{document}) of the same events as in those presented in A–C. A Gaussian fit is superimposed (N = number of events). (E) Experimentally measured GABA-activated Cl−-current transient (mean of 12 events; continuous line) and current response obtained by mathematical modelling (circles).CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Depolarization-induced exocytosis. (A) Transient Cl− currents (bottom) and increase in cell capacitance (middle) triggered by a train of ten 500-ms depolarizations from −70 to 0 mV in an infected β-cell. (Inset) A part of the recording (marked by the dashed box) on an expanded time base, including five transient Cl− currents. Note that the driving force for Cl− ions is inward (corresponding to an upward deflection of the current trace) at 0 mV and outward at −70 mV with the solutions used. While some transient currents were observed between the depolarization pulses, no events were observed before the train. (B) Number of Cl− current transients (N) elicited by the individual depolarization pulses during trains of 10 500-ms depolarizations from −70 to 0 mV during a first train (black bars) and a second train applied 2 min later (white bars, n = 5).
Figure 5. Depolarization-induced exocytosis. (A) Transient Cl− currents (bottom) and increase in cell capacitance (middle) triggered by a train of ten 500-ms depolarizations from −70 to 0 mV in an infected β-cell. (Inset) A part of the recording (marked by the dashed box) on an expanded time base, including five transient Cl− currents. Note that the driving force for Cl− ions is inward (corresponding to an upward deflection of the current trace) at 0 mV and outward at −70 mV with the solutions used. While some transient currents were observed between the depolarization pulses, no events were observed before the train. (B) Number of Cl− current transients (N) elicited by the individual depolarization pulses during trains of 10 500-ms depolarizations from −70 to 0 mV during a first train (black bars) and a second train applied 2 min later (white bars, n = 5).CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 6. Ca2+ dependence of GABA release. (A) Cl− current transients (top) and increase in cell capacitance (middle) elicited by an increase in [Ca2+]i (bottom) produced by photorelease from caged Ca2+ preloaded into the cell. The cell was held at −70 mV and the time of photoliberation is indicated by the arrow (artifacts in the capacitance trace caused by the Cl− current transients have been removed). (B) Representative recordings of Cl− current transients (indicated by arrows) from cells infused with pipette solution containing 3 μM (top) or 25 μM (bottom) free Ca2+.
Figure 6. Ca2+ dependence of GABA release. (A) Cl− current transients (top) and increase in cell capacitance (middle) elicited by an increase in [Ca2+]i (bottom) produced by photorelease from caged Ca2+ preloaded into the cell. The cell was held at −70 mV and the time of photoliberation is indicated by the arrow (artifacts in the capacitance trace caused by the Cl− current transients have been removed). (B) Representative recordings of Cl− current transients (indicated by arrows) from cells infused with pipette solution containing 3 μM (top) or 25 μM (bottom) free Ca2+.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 7. Depolarization-evoked GABA release requires Ca2+-influx through voltage-gated Ca2+-channels. (A) Current responses elicited by a train of ten 500-ms depolarizations from −70 to 0 mV before (top) and after (bottom) addition of CdCl2 (10 μM) to the bath solution. (B) Cl− current transients (open circles), capacitance increase (ΔCm; filled circles), and peak Ca2+ current (ICa; squares) triggered by 500-ms depolarizations from −70 mV to the indicated potentials. All data points correspond to average ± SEM from 8–35 experiments. Note that there is an ∼20 mV difference in the liquid junction potential between the intracellular solution used in this series of experiments and those used in most other experiments. Thus, the voltage experienced by the cells during depolarization to 0 mV in Figs. 5, A and B, and 7 A is comparable to −20 mV in this series of experiments.
Figure 7. Depolarization-evoked GABA release requires Ca2+-influx through voltage-gated Ca2+-channels. (A) Current responses elicited by a train of ten 500-ms depolarizations from −70 to 0 mV before (top) and after (bottom) addition of CdCl2 (10 μM) to the bath solution. (B) Cl− current transients (open circles), capacitance increase (ΔCm; filled circles), and peak Ca2+ current (ICa; squares) triggered by 500-ms depolarizations from −70 mV to the indicated potentials. All data points correspond to average ± SEM from 8–35 experiments. Note that there is an ∼20 mV difference in the liquid junction potential between the intracellular solution used in this series of experiments and those used in most other experiments. Thus, the voltage experienced by the cells during depolarization to 0 mV in Figs. 5, A and B, and 7 A is comparable to −20 mV in this series of experiments.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 8. cAMP stimulation of GABA exocytosis. (A) Cl− current transients elicited by trains of 500-ms depolarizations before (top) and 2 min after (bottom) addition of forskolin (2 μM) to the bath solution. (B) Histogram summarizing the GABA release events elicited per train under control conditions and after stimulation with forskolin. (C) As in B but instead showing the total increase in cell capacitance (ΔCm) elicited by the train. In B and C, the data are mean values ± SEM of 10 experiments.
Figure 8. cAMP stimulation of GABA exocytosis. (A) Cl− current transients elicited by trains of 500-ms depolarizations before (top) and 2 min after (bottom) addition of forskolin (2 μM) to the bath solution. (B) Histogram summarizing the GABA release events elicited per train under control conditions and after stimulation with forskolin. (C) As in B but instead showing the total increase in cell capacitance (ΔCm) elicited by the train. In B and C, the data are mean values ± SEM of 10 experiments.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 1995, J. Membr. Biol., 148, 193
  2. 2000, News Physiol. Sci., 15, 72
  3. 2000, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 85, 4053
  4. 1991, Diabetes., 40, 1365

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 135

Metadata

Authors
Braun, M., Wendt, A., Birnir, B., Broman, J., Eliasson, L., Galvanovskis, J., Gromada, J., Mulder, H., & Rorsman, P.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • 3Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Forschung GmbH, D-22419 Hamburg, Germany
Corresponding author
Braun, Matthias
Venue
The Journal of General Physiology
Published
2004-02-09
Volume
123
Issue
3
Pages
191-204
ISSN
  • 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7748
OpenAlex
W2128115766
Cited by
130
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of General Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
GABA release, regulated exocytosis, synaptic-like microvesicles, pancreatic beta cells, quantal release, readily releasable pool, reserve pool, calcium-dependent exocytosis, islet, insulin secretion, large dense core vesicles
MeSH terms
Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Exocytosis, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Islets of Langerhans, Receptors, GABA-A, Synaptic Vesicles, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Wistar, Calcium Signaling, Rats, GABA-A Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review