Cited by 142Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Far-infrared observations of Sagittarius A - The luminosity and dust density in the central parsec of the Galaxy

Becklin, E. E., Gatley, I., Werner, M. W.·1982·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Far-infrared observations of the central 4 arcmin of the Galaxy with 30-arcsec resolution made simultaneously at 30 microns, 50 microns, and 100 microns are presented. The 30-micron radiation peaks strongly at the position of the galactic center, as determined from the 2-micron surface brightness and the density of ionized gas. The 50- and 100-micron emission is much more extended along the plane and shows two emission lobes, one on either side of the 30-micron peak. At the position of the galactic center itself there is a local minimum in the 100-micron surface brightness. It is concluded that the dust density decreases inward over the central few parsecs of the Galaxy and that the dust density in the central parsec is so low that optical and ultraviolet radiation freely traverses this region. The total luminosity of the sources heating the dust which radiates the far-infrared emission from the central few parsecs is deduced to be between 1 x 10 to the 7th and 3 x 10 to the 7th solar luminosities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/160060

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CND has a total mass of 10^5-6 M⊙ and hosts several clumps with densities of ~10^6-8 cm^-3 and gas temperatures of ~50 K.

    “The CND has a total mass of 10 5 -6 M ⊙ and hosts several clumps with densities of ∼ 10 6 -8 cm -3 and gas temperatures of ∼ 50 K (Becklin et al. 1982; Brown & Liszt 1984; Genzel et al. 1985; Serabyn et al. 1986; Genzel et al. 2010; Hsieh et al. 2021).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Becklin et al. 1982

  • The central 1-1.5 pc radius can be described as the 'ionized cavity' (T~5-7×10^3 K) that is affected by UV radiation either from Sgr A* or from the nuclear starcluster.

    “The central 1 -1 . 5 pc radius can be described as the 'ionized cavity' ( T ∼ 5 -7 × 10 3 K) that is affected by the UV radiation either from Sgr A ∗ or from the nuclear starcluster (Becklin et al. 1982; Guesten et al. 1987; Shukla et al. 2004; Christopher et al. 2005).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Becklin et al. 1982

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Becklin, E. E., Gatley, I., & Werner, M. W.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1982-07
Volume
258
Pages
135
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2031070315
Cited by
142
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
Sgr A*, Galactic Center, far-infrared emission, dust luminosity, central parsec, 100 micron emission, ionized gas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review