The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices in Consumer Research
Abstract
This article examines three alternative procedures for analyzing multitrait-multimethod matrices: the Campbell-Fiske procedure, confirmatory factor analysis, and the direct product model. The implicit assumptions, as well as the strengths and weaknesses, of each approach are presented and their implications discussed. It is proposed that one should carefully examine model assumptions, individual parameters, and various diagnostic indicators, as well as overall model fits. The implications of these recommendations are illustrated through reanalyses of data from earlier studies of consumer behavior. Potentially misleading conclusions in these studies are corrected in demonstrations of the three procedures. The results show that methods often have multiplicative effects, a finding that supports the direct product model, which has not been previously used in consumer research. The need for multiple-method, multiple-measure approaches to research is highlighted by examining the limitations of single-method, single-measure approaches to theory testing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals’ Concerns About Organizational Practices1
Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249477 · Cited by 2,266
The use of lisrel in validating marketing constructs
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (1991) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/0167-8116(91)90027-5 · Cited by 1,848
Cross-Sectional versus longitudinal survey research: concepts, findings, and guidelines
Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261 · Cited by 1,305
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800109 · Cited by 3,322
Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale
Lu, L., Cai, R., & Gursoy, D. (2019) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.01.005 · Cited by 1,013
Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit.
Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16 · Cited by 401
Acceptance of mobile banking framework in Pakistan
Afshan, S., & Sharif, A. (2016) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.09.005 · Cited by 376
Gupta, K., & Arora, N. (2019) · South Asian Journal of Business Studies · doi:10.1108/sajbs-03-2019-0037 · Cited by 208
The servicescape as an antecedent to service quality and behavioral intentions
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & R. Mullen, M. (2013) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/08876041311330753 · Cited by 183
Tandon, U., Mittal, A., & Manohar, S. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00436-1 · Cited by 81
Multitrait–multimethod matrices in consumer research: Critique and new developments
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1993) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/s1057-7408(08)80022-8 · Cited by 61
Self-citationChen, M., & Lu, T. (2011) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241111176344 · Cited by 60
Fazal-e-Hasan, S. M., Lings, I. N., Mortimer, G., & Neale, L. (2017) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2016.1270769 · Cited by 49
Woodward, M. J., Patton, S. C., Olsen, S. A., Jones, J. M., Reich, C. M., Blackwell, N., & Beck, J. G. (2013) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.02.007 · Cited by 22
Behavioural intention to use a contact tracing application: the case of StopCovid in France
Shahidi, N., Tossan, V., Bourliataux-Lajoinie, S., & Cacho-Elizondo, S. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102998 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 426
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2059851708
- Cited by
- 758
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
