CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

How do attachment style and social support contribute to women's psychopathology following intimate partner violence? Examining clinician ratings versus self-report

Woodward, Matthew J., Patton, Samantha C., Olsen, Shira A., Jones, Judiann M., Reich, Catherine M., Blackwell, Náthali, Beck, J. Gayle·2013·Journal of Anxiety Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.02.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Concurrent associations between attachment style and social support in posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder were explored using regression analyses in a sample of 108 victims of intimate partner violence. To examine whether assessment modality influenced findings, self-report and clinician ratings of psychopathology were compared. Both lower perceived social support and higher attachment anxiety were significantly associated with higher self-reported PTSD; however, only lower social support was significantly associated with clinician assessed PTSD. Lower social support, higher attachment anxiety, and lower attachment closeness were related with higher self-reported depression; however, only lower social support was related to clinician assessed depression. Lastly, only higher attachment anxiety was associated with self-reported GAD, whereas lower attachment dependency showed the only significant association in clinician assessed GAD. Possible explanations for discrepancies between assessment modalities are discussed, with emphasis on application to intimate partner violence and suggestions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.02.007

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Woodward, M. J., Patton, S. C., Olsen, S. A., Jones, J. M., Reich, C. M., Blackwell, N., & Beck, J. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Woodward, Matthew J.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
312-320
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.02.007
OpenAlex
W2059894526
Cited by
22
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
intimate partner violence, attachment styles, perceived social support, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, attachment anxiety, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Domestic Violence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review