Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 242

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Power Spectrum of Mass Fluctuations Measured from the Lyα Forest at Redshift z = 2.5

Open access
Croft, Rupert A. C., Weinberg, David H., Pettini, Max, Hernquist, Lars, Katz, Neal·1999·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We measure the linear power spectrum of mass-density fluctuations at redshift z = 2.5 from the Lyα forest absorption in a sample of 19 QSO spectra, using the method introduced by Croft et al. The P ( k ) measurement covers the range 2π/ k ~ 450-2350 km s -1 (2-12 comoving h -1 Mpc for Ω = 1), limited on the upper end by uncertainty in fitting the unabsorbed QSO continuum and on the lower end by finite spectral resolution (0.8-2.3 Å FWHM) and by nonlinear dynamical effects. We examine a number of possible sources of systematic error and find none that are significant on these scales. In particular, we show that spatial variations in the UV background caused by the discreteness of the source population should have negligible effect on our P ( k ) measurement. We estimate statistical errors by dividing the data set into ten subsamples. The statistical uncertainty in the rms mass-fluctuation amplitude, σ ∝ [ P ( k )] 1/2 , is ~20%, and is dominated by the finite number of spectra in the sample. We obtain consistent P ( k ) measurements (with larger statistical uncertainties) from the high- and low-redshift halves of the data set, and from an entirely independent sample of nine QSO spectra with mean redshift z = 2.1. A power-law fit to our results yields a logarithmic slope n = -2.25 ± 0.18 and an amplitude Δ 2 ρ ( k p ) = 0.57 +0.26 -0.18 , where Δ 2 ρ is the contribution to the density variance from a unit interval of ln k and k p = 0.008(km s -1 ) -1 . Direct comparison of our mass P ( k ) to the measured clustering of Lyman break galaxies shows that they are a highly biased population, with a bias factor b ~ 2-5. The slope of the linear P ( k ), never previously measured on these scales, is close to that predicted by models based on inflation and cold dark matter (CDM). The P ( k ) amplitude is consistent with some scale-invariant, COBE -normalized CDM models (e.g., an open model with Ω 0 = 0.4) and inconsistent with others (e.g., Ω = 1). Even with limited dynamic range and substantial statistical uncertainty, a measurement of P ( k ) that has no unknown "bias factors" offers many opportunities for testing theories of structure formation and constraining cosmological parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/307438

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 242

Metadata

Authors
Croft, R. A. C., Weinberg, D. H., Pettini, M., Hernquist, L., & Katz, N.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1999-07-20
Volume
520
Issue
1
Pages
1-23
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2029566685
Cited by
242
References
0
FWCI
20.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Power Spectrum of Mass Fluctuations Measured from the Lyα Forest at Redshift z = 2.5. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/307438
The paper
Croft, R. A. C., Weinberg, D. H., Pettini, M., Hernquist, L., & Katz, N. (1999). The Power Spectrum of Mass Fluctuations Measured from the Lyα Forest at Redshift z = 2.5. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/307438

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.