The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort
Abstract
This article shows that Medical Innovation—the landmark study by Coleman, Katz, and Menzel—and several subsequent studies analyzing the diffusion of the drug tetracycline have confounded social contagion with marketing effects. The article describes the medical community’s understanding of tetracycline and how the drug was marketed. This situational analysis finds no reasons to expect social contagion; instead, aggressive marketing efforts may have played an important role. The Medical Innovation data set is reanalyzed and supplemented with newly collected advertising data. When marketing efforts are controlled for, contagion effects disappear. The article underscores the importance of controlling for potential confounds when studying the role of social contagion in innovation diffusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication
Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0071 · Cited by 2,601
Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana
Conley, T. G., & Udry, C. R. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.1.35 · Cited by 2,180
Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0415 · Cited by 1,127
Babić Rosario, A., Sotgiu, F., De Valck, K., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0380 · Cited by 1,073
Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion
Iyengar, R., Van den Bulte, C., & Valente, T. W. (2011) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1100.0566 · Cited by 996
Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications
Valente, T. W. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301014.001.0001 · Cited by 933
A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing
De Bruyn, A., & Lilien, G. L. (2008) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.03.004 · Cited by 906
Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test
Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2009) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1080.0444 · Cited by 837
Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology
Hedstrom, P. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511488801 · Cited by 816
(2005) · Cited by 772
Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test
Van den Bulte, C., & Stremersch, S. (2004) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0054 · Cited by 434
Self-citationConspicuous conservation: The Prius halo and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides
Sexton, S. E., & Sexton, A. L. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2013.11.004 · Cited by 413
Mendel, P., Meredith, L. S., Schoenbaum, M., Sherbourne, C. D., & Wells, K. B. (2008) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0144-9 · Cited by 407
Bapna, R., & Umyarov, A. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2081 · Cited by 350
Exercise contagion in a global social network
Aral, S., & Nicolaides, C. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14753 · Cited by 329
Social effects on customer retention
Nitzan, I., & Libai, B. (2011) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.10.0209 · Cited by 302
Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion
González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213479371 · Cited by 327
An Empirical Analysis of User Content Generation and Usage Behavior on the Mobile Internet
Ghose, A., & Han, S. P. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1350 · Cited by 282
Andrews, K. T., & Biggs, M. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100503 · Cited by 243
The dynamics of health behavior sentiments on a large online social network
Salathé, M., Vu, D. Q., Khandelwal, S., & Hunter, D. R. (2013) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds16 · Cited by 116
How Customer Referral Programs Turn Social Capital into Economic Capital
Van Den Bulte, C., Bayer, E., Skiera, B., & Schmitt, P. (2018) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0653 · Cited by 110
Technologies and Health Inequities
Timmermans, S., & Kaufman, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054802 · Cited by 83
Platform diffusion at temporary gatherings: Social coordination and ecosystem emergence
Fang, T. P., Wu, A., & Clough, D. R. (2021) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3230 · Cited by 85
Referral Contagion: Downstream Benefits of Customer Referrals
Gershon, R., & Jiang, Z. (2025) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437241257886 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Van den Bulte, C., & Lilien, G. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1409-1435
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1485623843
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
