The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Marital Residence among Foragers
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some studies, based on contemporary hunter-gatherers, have argued that ancient hunter-gatherers may have been mostly patrilocal57, while others have argued that they were more likely to be mostly multilocal12 (where multilocal residence is defined as a rule under which couples can choose to live near the husband’s or the wife’s place of birth).”
From Patrilineal segmentary systems provide a peaceful explanation for the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“The choice of bilateral descent for the initial phase was motivated by the fact that contemporary hunter-gatherers exhibit most frequently bilateral descent12.”
From Patrilineal segmentary systems provide a peaceful explanation for the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Alvarez H., Kinship and behavior in Primates. Edited by B. Chapais and C. M. Berman.
- CluttonBrock T. H., 1981, Nature, 289, 48789
- Eggan F., Lee and I. DeVore, 16162
- Ember C. R., 1975, Behavior Science Research, 10, 199227
- 10.2307/3773193 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/soutjanth.28.4.3629318 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1971.73.3.02a00040 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1958.60.3.02a00090 · DOI
- Foley R., 1995, Evolutionary Anthropology, 4, 194203, 10.1002/evan.1360040603 · DOI
- 10.1016/0047-2484(87)90065-0 · DOI
- 10.1086/soutjanth.12.1.3628856 · DOI
- 1962, New Britain. Ethnology, 1, 512
- 10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80103-5 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1336 · DOI · Paper page
- Hiatt L. R., Arguments about Aborigines
- 10.1007/BF00164006 · DOI
- Kelly R. L., The foraging spectrum, 10.2307/j.ctv2sx9gc9 · DOI
- Korotayev A., 2001, World Cultures, 12, 179203
- Lee R. B., The !Kung San: Men, women, and work in a foraging society
- Linton R., The study of man
- Marlowe F. W., 2003, CrossCultural Research, 37, 282306
- 10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80328-0 · DOI
- Murdock G. P., Social structure
- 10.1086/303236 · DOI
- Pusey A. E., Struhsaker, 25066
- RadcliffeBrown A. R., 1930, Oceania, 1, 3463
- Service E. R., Primitive social organization
- 10.1126/science.179.4068.90 · DOI
- Waser P. M., Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution, 2, 26795
- 10.1086/282292 · DOI
- Woodburn J., Lee and I. DeVore, 10310
- 10.1177/053901847901800301 · DOI
- 1980, Behaviour, 75, 262300
- Wrangham R. W., 1996, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Cited by
Hunter-gatherers and human evolution.
Marlowe, F. W. (2005) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20046 · Cited by 944
Self-citationBiosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7 · Cited by 770
Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?
Archer, J. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09990951 · Cited by 607
Sex differences in cooperation: A meta-analytic review of social dilemmas.
Balliet, D., Li, N. P., Macfarlan, S. J., & Van Vugt, M. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0025354 · Cited by 349
The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences
Archer, J. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12507 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Marlowe, F. W.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277-284
- ISSN
- 0011-3204
- 1537-5382
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marital Residence among Foragers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/382256
- The paper
- Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Marital Residence among Foragers. Current Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1086/382256
