Cited by 789Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

Repetitive and Non-Repetitive DNA Sequences and a Speculation on the Origins of Evolutionary Novelty

Britten, Roy J., Davidson, Eric H.·1971·The Quarterly Review of Biology

Abstract

Recent experimental information on DNA sequence repetition is reviewed, and the significance of both repetitive and non-repetitive sequence considered. Included are a summary of data on the distribution of genome sizes in animals, new experiments on interspecific DNA homology, the distribution of sequence frequencies, and the interspersion of repetitive sequences within the genome. Aspects of the process of evolution are considered at the level of change in the DNA. the process by which novel structure and function could have arisen during evolution are considered speculatively in terms of the authors' gene regulation theory (Britten and Davidson, 1969).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/406830

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mobile elements could have provided a major mechanism of gene regulatory network evolution.

    “In summary, as previously speculated (Britten and Davidson, 1971), mobile elements could have provided a major mechanism of GRN evolution.”

    From Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development (2011) · cites this paper as Britten and Davidson, 1971

    In “Proposals for the Origin of Evolutionary Novelty” (pp. 124–126), the paper speculates that genomic rearrangements could construct new regulatory networks, including by moving regulatory sequences to new locations. That supports the proposed link to regulatory-network evolution, but the passages describe chromosomal rearrangements and repetitive sequences, not mobile elements specifically as a major mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Such changes in gene regulatory network operation cause changes in developmental process and ultimately in the body plan.

    “This will cause changes in developmental process, and ultimately in the product of that process, the body plan (Britten and Davidson, 1971; Davidson and Erwin, 2006; Erwin and Davidson, 2009).”

    From Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development (2011) · cites this paper as Britten and Davidson, 1971

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. BIER, K., w. KUNZ, and D. RIBBERT. 1969. Insect oogenesis with and without lampbrush chromo­ somes. In C. D. Darlington and K. R. Lewis (eds.), Chromosomes Today, Vol. 2, p. 107-115. Plenum Press, N.Y.
  2. 1969b. Repeated DNA and transcription. In E. W. Hanly (ed.), Problems in Biology: RNA in Development, p. 187-216. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
  3. --, and --. 1969a. Repetition of nucleotide sequences in chromosomal DNA. In A. Lima­ de-Faria (ed.), Handbook of Molecular Cy-

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Britten, R. J., & Davidson, E. H.
Venue
The Quarterly Review of Biology
Published
1971-06
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
111-138
ISSN
  • 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-7718
OpenAlex
W2012036024
Cited by
789
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
35.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Review of Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
repetitive DNA, interspersed repetitive elements, DNA sequence evolution
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, DNA, Biological Evolution, Genetic Code, Models, Chemical, Molecular Biology, RNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review