The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Models Are Used to Represent Reality
Abstract
Most recent philosophical thought about the scientific representation of the world has focused on dyadic relationships between language-like entities and the world, particularly the semantic relationships of reference and truth. Drawing inspiration from diverse sources, I argue that we should focus on the pragmatic activity of representing, so that the basic representational relationship has the form: Scientists use models to represent aspects of the world for specific purposes. Leaving aside the terms “law” and “theory,” I distinguish principles, specific conditions, models, hypotheses, and generalizations. I argue that scientists use designated similarities between models and aspects of the world to form both hypotheses and generalizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition
Tomasello, M. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjsf4jc · Cited by 6,368
Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science
Hacking, I. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814563 · Cited by 4,814
Fraassen, B. C. V. (1980) · doi:10.1093/0198244274.001.0001 · Cited by 4,682
Demopoulos, W., & van Fraassen, B. C. (1982) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184804 · Cited by 3,311
Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again.
van Gelder, T., & Clark, A. (1998) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2998391 · Cited by 3,128
Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-6204 · Cited by 2,631
The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science
Cartwright, N. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167093 · Cited by 2,433
Cartwright, N. (1983) · doi:10.1093/0198247044.001.0001 · Cited by 2,082
Fraassen, B. C. V. (1989) · doi:10.1093/0198248601.001.0001 · Cited by 1,821
Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach
Giere, R. N. (1988) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226292038.001.0001 · Cited by 1,766
Self-citation
Cited by
Glennan, S. (2017) · Oxford Scholarship Online · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198779711.001.0001 · Cited by 603
Modelling and representing: An artefactual approach to model-based representation
Knuuttila, T. (2011) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.034 · Cited by 332
Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose View
Parker, W. S. (2020) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/708691 · Cited by 310
Stepp, N., & Turvey, M. T. (2010) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2009.03.003 · Cited by 202
External representations and scientific understanding
Kuorikoski, J., & Ylikoski, P. (2015) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0591-2 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Giere, R. N.
- Venue
- Philosophy of Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 742-752
- ISSN
- 0031-8248 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-767X
- OpenAlex
- W2174159946
- Cited by
- 802
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 78.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Models Are Used to Represent Reality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/425063
- The paper
- Giere, R. N. (2004). How Models Are Used to Represent Reality. Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1086/425063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.