The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Two Micron All Sky Survey View of the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy. III. Constraints on the Flattening of the Galactic Halo
Open accessAbstract
M giants selected from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) have been used to trace streams of tidal debris apparently associated with the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy (Sgr) that entirely encircle the Galaxy. While the Sgr M giants are generally aligned with a single great circle on the sky, we measure a difference of 10 4 ± 2 6 between the mean orbital poles of the great circles that best fit debris leading and trailing Sgr, which can be attributed to the precession of Sgr's orbit over the range of phases explored by the data set. Simulations of the destruction of Sgr in potentials containing bulge, disk, and halo components best reproduce this level of precession along the same range of orbital phases if the potential contours of the halo are only slightly flattened, with the ratio of the axis length perpendicular to and in the disk in the range q = 0.90-0.95 (corresponding to isodensity contours with q ρ ~ 0.83-0.92). Oblate halos are strongly preferred over prolate ( q ρ > 1) halos, and flattenings in the potential of q ≤ 0.85 ( q ρ ≤ 0.75) and q ≥ 1.05 ( q ρ ≥ 1.1) are ruled out at the 3 σ level. More extreme values of q ≤ 0.80 ( q ρ ≤ 0.6) and q ≥ 1.25 ( q ρ ≥ 1.6) are ruled out at the 7 and 5 σ levels, respectively. These constraints will improve as debris with larger separation in orbital phases is found.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Galaxy in Context: Structural, Kinematic, and Integrated Properties
Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Gerhard, O. (2016) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441 · Cited by 1,656
The mass distribution and gravitational potential of the Milky Way
McMillan, P. J. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2759 · Cited by 1,099
“The study of the Sagittarius stream by Johnston et al.(2005) had best fitting models with masses in the range (3.8− 5.6)× 1011 within 50 kpc, which is in keeping with our prior.”
ResultInfluentialTHE SAGITTARIUS DWARF GALAXY: A MODEL FOR EVOLUTION IN A TRIAXIAL MILKY WAY HALO
Law, D. R., & Majewski, S. R. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/1/229 · Cited by 550
Self-citationStreams, Substructures, and the Early History of the Milky Way
Helmi, A. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021917 · Cited by 407
The total mass of the Large Magellanic Cloud from its perturbation on the Orphan stream
Erkal, D., Belokurov, V, Laporte, C. F. P., Koposov, S. E., Li, T. S., Grillmair, C. J., Kallivayalil, N., Price-Whelan, A. M., Evans, N. W., Hawkins, K., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1371 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnston, K. V., Law, D. R., & Majewski, S. R.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 619
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 800-806
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2032551406
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Two Micron All Sky Survey View of the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy. III. Constraints on the Flattening of the Galactic Halo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/426777
- The paper
- Johnston, K. V., Law, D. R., & Majewski, S. R. (2005). A Two Micron All Sky Survey View of the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy. III. Constraints on the Flattening of the Galactic Halo. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/426777
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.