Bayesian Analysis of Correlated Evolution of Discrete Characters by Reversible‐Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo
Abstract
We describe a Bayesian method for investigating correlated evolution of discrete binary traits on phylogenetic trees. The method fits a continuous-time Markov model to a pair of traits, seeking the best fitting models that describe their joint evolution on a phylogeny. We employ the methodology of reversible-jump (RJ) Markov chain Monte Carlo to search among the large number of possible models, some of which conform to independent evolution of the two traits, others to correlated evolution. The RJ Markov chain visits these models in proportion to their posterior probabilities, thereby directly estimating the support for the hypothesis of correlated evolution. In addition, the RJ Markov chain simultaneously estimates the posterior distributions of the rate parameters of the model of trait evolution. These posterior distributions can be used to test among alternative evolutionary scenarios to explain the observed data. All results are integrated over a sample of phylogenetic trees to account for phylogenetic uncertainty. We implement the method in a program called RJ Discrete and illustrate it by analyzing the question of whether mating system and advertisement of estrus by females have coevolved in the Old World monkeys and great apes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Testing whether an ancestral change in one trait consistently leads to the same change in the other trait would suggest the co-evolution is due to a causal link.
“To distinguish which scenario is more likely, we could test whether an ancestral change in one trait consistently leads to the same change in the other trait, which would suggest the co-evolution is due to a causal link42,43,51,85–87 (Fig. 3).”
From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [51]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The evolution of social monogamy in mammals
Lukas, D., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1238677 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology
MacLean, E. L., Matthews, L. J., Hare, B. A., Nunn, C. L., Anderson, R. C., Aureli, F., Brannon, E. M., Call, J., Drea, C. M., Emery, N. J., et al. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-011-0448-8 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Ritual human sacrifice promoted and sustained the evolution of stratified societies
Watts, J., Sheehan, O., Atkinson, Q. D., Bulbulia, J., & Gray, R. D. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17159 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF CETACEAN BRAIN AND BODY SIZE: CETACEAN BRAIN EVOLUTION
Montgomery, S. H., Geisler, J. H., McGowen, M. R., Fox, C., Marino, L., & Gatesy, J. (2013) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12197 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Montgomery, S. H., Capellini, I., Barton, R. A., & Mundy, N. I. (2010) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-9 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics
Dewar, A. E., Belcher, L. J., & West, S. A. (2025) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-024-00803-0 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
A Guided Tour of Phylogenetic Comparative Methods for Studying Trait Evolution
Cornwallis, C. K., & Griffin, A. S. (2024) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102221-050754 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pagel, M., & Meade, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Reading (GB)
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 808-825
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2042220296
- Cited by
- 920
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 70
- FWCI
- 23.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/C51992X/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- correlated evolution, reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo, continuous-time Markov model, phylogenetic tree, model selection, trait evolution rates, phylogenetic uncertainty, mating systems, Old World monkeys, great apes, coevolution
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bayes Theorem, Biological Evolution, Female, Male, Markov Chains, Models, Genetic, Monte Carlo Method, Primates, Sexual Behavior, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review