Cited by 54Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityHIV/AIDS oral health manifestationsFungal Infections and Studies

Point Prevalence of Oropharyngeal Carriage of Fluconazole‐Resistant Candida in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Patients

Martins, Marcelo D., Lozano‐Chiu, Mario, Rex, John H.·1997·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

To estimate the prevalence of both clinically evident and asymptomatic carriage of fluconazole-resistant Candida, we prospectively surveyed 128 adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The patients had an average CD4 cell count of 206/mm3. Ninety-seven isolates of Candida were obtained from the oropharynx of 82 patients (64%). Of these 82 patients, 76% carried C. albicans alone; 18%, both albicans and non-albicans isolates; and 6%, non-albicans species alone. Oropharyngeal candidiasis was evident in only 38 (46%) of the 82 patients for whom a culture was positive and was never seen unless C. albicans was present. When MICs were measured by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-T methodology and grouped by using recently proposed breakpoints, we found that eight of the 38 patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis and six of the 44 patients who were asymptomatically colonized carried C. albicans isolates resistant to fluconazole (MIC, > or = 64 micrograms/mL); estimated rates of carriage were 21% (95% confidence interval, 10%-37%) and 14% (95% confidence interval, 5%-27%), respectively. Carriage of resistant isolates of C. albicans by HIV-infected adults is more common than previously suspected, and clinicians should be alert to the possible need for either higher doses of fluconazole or alternative treatment modalities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/515554

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In North American oral candidiasis (HIV/AIDS-positive) patients, the prevalence of fluconazole-resistant C. albicans isolates was found to be between 12% and 22%.

    “This has occurred with greatest frequency in the setting of patients suffering from HIV/AIDS during treatment for oropharyngeal candidiasis, where the prevalence of fluconazole-resistant C. albicans isolates in North American oral candidiasis (HIV/AIDS-positive) patients was found to be between 12% and 22%.38–42”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martins, M. D., Lozano‐Chiu, M., & Rex, J. H.
Corresponding author
Rex, John H.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
1997-10
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
843-846
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2121373447
Cited by
54
References
21
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
fluconazole resistance, Candida albicans, oropharyngeal candidiasis, HIV infection, non-albicans Candida, oropharyngeal colonization
MeSH terms
Adult, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Oral, Carrier State, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Female, Humans, Male, Oropharynx, Prospective Studies, HIV Infections, Fluconazole, CD4 Lymphocyte Count

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review