Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SN 2006gy: An Extremely Luminous Supernova in the Galaxy NGC 1260

Open access
Ofek, E. O., Cameron, P. B., Kasliwal, M. M., Gal-Yam, A., Rau, A., Kulkarni, S. R., Frail, D. A., Chandra, P., Cenko, S. B., Soderberg, A. M., Immler, S.·2007·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

With an extinction-corrected V -band peak absolute magnitude of about -22, supernova SN 2006gy is probably the brightest SN ever observed. We report on multiwavelength observations of this SN and its environment. Our spectroscopy shows an Hα emission line as well as absorption features that may be identified as Si II lines at low expansion velocity. The slow brightening, the peak luminosity, and the Hα emission line resemble those observed in hybrid Type IIn/Ia SNe (also known as Type IIa) and may suggest that SN 2006gy is related to the Type IIa SNe class. The host galaxy, NGC 1260, is dominated by an old stellar population with solar metallicity. However, our high-resolution adaptive optics images reveal a dust lane in this galaxy, and there appears to be an H II region in the vicinity of the SN. The extraordinarily large peak luminosity, ~3 × 10 44 ergs s -1 , demands a dense circumstellar medium, regardless of the mass of the progenitor star. The inferred mass-loss rate of the progenitor is ~0.1 M ☉ yr -1 over a period of ~10 yr prior to explosion. Such an high mass-loss rate may be the result of a binary star common envelope ejection. The total radiated energy in the first 2 months is about 1.1 × 10 51 ergs, which is only a factor of 2 less than that available from a super-Chandrasekhar Type Ia explosion. Therefore, given the presence of a star-forming region in the vicinity of the SN and the high-energy requirements, a plausible scenario is that SN 2006gy is related to the death of a massive star.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/516749

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Ofek, E. O., Cameron, P. B., Kasliwal, M. M., Gal-Yam, A., Rau, A., Kulkarni, S. R., Frail, D. A., Chandra, P., Cenko, S. B., Soderberg, A. M., & Immler, S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2007-03-06
Volume
659
Issue
1
Pages
L13-L16
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2060288828
Cited by
281
References
3
FWCI
12.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SN 2006gy: An Extremely Luminous Supernova in the Galaxy NGC 1260. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/516749
The paper
Ofek, E. O., Cameron, P. B., Kasliwal, M. M., Gal-Yam, A., Rau, A., Kulkarni, S. R., Frail, D. A., Chandra, P., Cenko, S. B., Soderberg, A. M., & Immler, S. (2007). SN 2006gy: An Extremely Luminous Supernova in the Galaxy NGC 1260. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/516749

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.