Cited by 31Anthropological Studies and InsightsIndigenous Studies in Latin AmericaDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Consuming Pity: The Production of Death among the Cashinahua

Open access
McCallum, Cecilia·1999·Cultural Anthropology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/can.1999.14.4.443

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCallum, C.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
Corresponding author
McCallum, Cecilia
Venue
Cultural Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-11
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
443-471
ISSN
  • 0886-7356 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1360
OpenAlex
W1973609427
Cited by
31
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 15 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Cultural Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
Cashinahua, death, mourning, Andean religion, funerary practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review