Cited by 22Indigenous Studies in Latin AmericaAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryLatin American history and culture

DIVISION OF ANTHROPOLOGY: ENDOCANNIBALISM AMONG THE AMAHUACA INDIANS*

Dole, Gertrude·1962·Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1962.tb01432.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dole, G.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Dole, Gertrude
Venue
Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1962-03
Volume
24
Issue
5 Series II
Pages
567-573
ISSN
  • 0028-7113 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-0947
OpenAlex
W2040835888
Cited by
22
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Latin American history and culture
Keywords
cannibalism, ritual, indigenous peoples of Mexico

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review