Cited by 603Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchAntibiotic Use and ResistanceInfection Control in Healthcare

Antimicrobial‐Associated Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection

Owens, Jr., Robert C., Donskey, Curtis J., Gaynes, Robert P., Loo, Vivian G., Muto, Carlene A.·2008·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Antimicrobial therapy plays a central role in the pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), presumably through disruption of indigenous intestinal microflora, thereby allowing C. difficile to grow and produce toxin. Investigations involving animal models and studies performed in vitro suggest that inhibitory activity against C. difficile and differences in the propensity to stimulate toxin production may also influence the likelihood that particular drugs may cause CDI. Although nearly all antimicrobial classes have been associated with CDI, clindamycin, third-generation cephalosporins, and penicillins have traditionally been considered to harbor the greatest risk. Recent studies have also implicated fluoroquinolones as high-risk agents, a finding that is most likely to be related in part to increasing fluoroquinolone resistance among epidemic strains (i.e., restriction-endonuclease analysis group BI/North American PFGE type 1 strains) and some nonepidemic strains of C. difficile. Restrictions in the use of clindamycin and third-generation cephalosporins have been associated with reductions in CDI. Because use of any antimicrobial has the potential to induce the onset of CDI and disease caused by other health care-associated pathogens, antimicrobial stewardship programs that promote judicious use of antimicrobials are encouraged in concert with environmental and infection control-related efforts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/521859

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owens, Jr., Donskey, C. J., Gaynes, R. P., Loo, V. G., & Muto, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • UPMC Presbyterian (US)
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2008-01-15
Volume
46
Issue
s1
Pages
S19-S31
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2111990189
Cited by
603
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 25
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
Clostridium difficile infection, clindamycin, third-generation cephalosporins, penicillin, fluoroquinolones, fluoroquinolone resistance, toxin production, antimicrobial stewardship, nosocomial infections, infection control
MeSH terms
Adult, Anti-Infective Agents, Drug Therapy, Combination, Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous, Humans, Intestines, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Clostridioides difficile, Ecosystem, Disease Management, Drug Resistance, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review