Of Chameleons and Consumption: The Impact of Mimicry on Choice and Preferences
Open accessAbstract
This article investigates the effect of mimicry on consumer product consumption and appraisal.We propose and test two paths via which mimicry may influence product preferences.In the mimicking consumer path, we suggest that individuals automatically mimic the consumption behaviors of other people and that such mimicry then affects preferences toward the product(s) consumed.In the mimicked consumer path, we argue that being mimicked leads to increased prosociality, which affects preferences for products presented in dyadic interactions.Three studies confirm the two paths and suggest that mimicry can indeed influence product preferences.S ocial scientists have long been intrigued by the human tendency to mimic the behavior of others.Research has shown that individuals automatically mimic multiple aspects of their interaction partners, including their postures, gestures, mannerisms, speech patterns, syntax, accents, facial expressions, and even moods and emotions (Chartrand and Bargh 1999;Chartrand, Maddux, and Lakin 2005;Dijksterhuis, Chartrand, and Aarts 2006).Much of the early work on automatic behavioral mimicry explored the relationship between mimicry and rapport and established that interactions with significant posture and mannerism sharing tended to be characterized by rapport and empathy between interactants (Bernieri 1988;Charney 1966;Dabbs 1969;La France 1979, 1982).Recent work has further explored the downstream consequences of mimicry and has shown, for example, that individuals like those who mimic them more and that mimicry promotes prosocial or helping behaviors *
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Synchrony may influence the patient's beliefs indirectly, by increasing receptiveness to the therapist's suggestions.
“Synchrony may influence the patient’s beliefs indirectly, by increasing receptiveness to the therapist’s suggestions (Tanner and Chartrand, 2008; Kelley et al., 2009).”
From Synchrony in Psychotherapy: A Review and an Integrative Framework for the Therapeutic Alliance (2016) · cites this paper as Tanner and Chartrand, 2008
Cites
The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209380 · Cited by 3,811 · see citing works
Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.
Bem, D. J. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0024835 · Cited by 2,959 · see citing works
Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher–student interactions
Bernieri, F. J. (1988) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf00986930 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Nonverbal synchrony and rapport: analysis by the cross-lag panel technique
LaFrance, M. (1979) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3033875 · Cited by 286 · cited 1× · see citing works
“0093-5301/2008/3406-0002$10.00”
InfluentialEffect of postural congruence on client’s perception of counselor empathy.
Maurer, R. E., & Tindall, J. H. (1983) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.30.2.158 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Priming effects of television food advertising on eating behavior.
Harris, J. L., Bargh, J. A., & Brownell, K. D. (2009) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014399 · Cited by 945 · see citing works
Ki, C. ‘., & Kim, Y. (2019) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21244 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
The Antecedents and Consequences of Human Behavioral Mimicry
Chartrand, T. L., & Lakin, J. L. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143754 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Self-citationSynchrony in Psychotherapy: A Review and an Integrative Framework for the Therapeutic Alliance
Koole, S. L., & Tschacher, W. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00862 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Actors conform, observers react: the effects of behavioral synchrony on conformity
Dong, P., Dai, X., & Wyer, R. S. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000001 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Learning Reciprocity in Complex Sequential Social Dilemmas
Eccles, T., Hughes, E., Kramár, J., Wheelwright, S., & Leibo, J. Z. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.08082 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tanner, R. J., Ferraro, R., Chartrand, T. L., Bettman, J. R., & Baaren, R. V.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 754-766
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2178288253
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 44.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Keywords
- mimicry, consumer behavior, product preference, product consumption, prosocial behavior, dyadic interaction, social influence, consumer choice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review