Cited by 233Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Of Chameleons and Consumption: The Impact of Mimicry on Choice and Preferences

Open access
Tanner, Robin J., Ferraro, Rosellina, Chartrand, Tanya L., Bettman, James R., Baaren, Rick Van·2008·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

This article investigates the effect of mimicry on consumer product consumption and appraisal.We propose and test two paths via which mimicry may influence product preferences.In the mimicking consumer path, we suggest that individuals automatically mimic the consumption behaviors of other people and that such mimicry then affects preferences toward the product(s) consumed.In the mimicked consumer path, we argue that being mimicked leads to increased prosociality, which affects preferences for products presented in dyadic interactions.Three studies confirm the two paths and suggest that mimicry can indeed influence product preferences.S ocial scientists have long been intrigued by the human tendency to mimic the behavior of others.Research has shown that individuals automatically mimic multiple aspects of their interaction partners, including their postures, gestures, mannerisms, speech patterns, syntax, accents, facial expressions, and even moods and emotions (Chartrand and Bargh 1999;Chartrand, Maddux, and Lakin 2005;Dijksterhuis, Chartrand, and Aarts 2006).Much of the early work on automatic behavioral mimicry explored the relationship between mimicry and rapport and established that interactions with significant posture and mannerism sharing tended to be characterized by rapport and empathy between interactants (Bernieri 1988;Charney 1966;Dabbs 1969;La France 1979, 1982).Recent work has further explored the downstream consequences of mimicry and has shown, for example, that individuals like those who mimic them more and that mimicry promotes prosocial or helping behaviors *

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/522322

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synchrony may influence the patient's beliefs indirectly, by increasing receptiveness to the therapist's suggestions.

    “Synchrony may influence the patient’s beliefs indirectly, by increasing receptiveness to the therapist’s suggestions (Tanner and Chartrand, 2008; Kelley et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanner, R. J., Ferraro, R., Chartrand, T. L., Bettman, J. R., & Baaren, R. V.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2008-04
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
754-766
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2178288253
Cited by
233
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
44.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
mimicry, consumer behavior, product preference, product consumption, prosocial behavior, dyadic interaction, social influence, consumer choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review