The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Search of Homo Economicus: Cognitive Noise and the Role of Emotion in Preference Consistency
Abstract
Understanding the role of emotion in forming preferences is critical in helping firms choose effective marketing strategies and consumers make appropriate consumption decisions. In five experiments, participants made a set of binary product choices under conditions designed to induce different degrees of emotional decision processing. The results consistently indicate that greater reliance on emotional reactions during decision making is associated with greater preference consistency and less cognitive noise. Additionally, the results of a meta-analytical study based on data from all five experiments further show that products that elicit a stronger emotional response are more likely to yield consistent preferences. The notion of preference consistency lies at the very foundation of understanding, predicting, and influencing consumer behavior. Most marketing activities, such as market research, new product development, marketing communications, and customer relationship management, assume consumers behave in somewhat consistent patterns. For example, if a customer indicates that he or she prefers chocolate to ginger, it is generally assumed that he or she is more likely than not to maintain such a preference in a following purchase occasion. Moreover, even people themselves like to think they are somewhat consistent decision makers (e.g., Bem 1972; Festinger 1957). On a related note, preference consistency is one of the cornerstones of Homo
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241
Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5304.1293 · Cited by 3,547
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100907 · Cited by 3,089
A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.1.3 · Cited by 2,931
Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious
Epstein, S. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.709 · Cited by 2,883 · cited 1×
“…1986), hot system versus cold system (Metcalfe and Mischel 1999), reflexive system versus reflective system (Lieberman et al. 2002), experiential system versus rational system (Epstein 1994, 2003), and the “approach/avoidance” versus “true/false” distinction (Zajonc 1998, 591), to name a few.”
BackgroundOut of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior
Loewenstein, G. (1996) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0028 · Cited by 2,610
Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making
Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209563 · Cited by 2,044
Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.
Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.181 · Cited by 1,417 · cited 2×
“…our results join other prior work that demonstrate the positive roles emotions play in decision making (Bechara et al. 1997; Damasio 1994; Davidson et al. 2000; Dijksterhuis 2004; Loewenstein and Lerner 2002; LeDoux 1996; Peters and Slovic 2000; Pham et al. 2001; Wilson and Schooler 1991).”
BackgroundResult
Cited by
An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003196 · Cited by 1,381
Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook
Plassmann, H., Ramsøy, T. Z., & Milosavljevic, M. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.010 · Cited by 585
Experience Marketing: Concepts, Frameworks and Consumer Insights
Schmitt, B. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Marketing · doi:10.1561/1700000027 · Cited by 428
Townsend, C., & Kahn, B. E. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/673521 · Cited by 316
Consumers’ Trust in Feelings as Information
Avnet, T., Pham, M. T., & Stephen, A. T. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/664978 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, L., Amir, O., & Ariely, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-187
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2125016606
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 7.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Search of Homo Economicus: Cognitive Noise and the Role of Emotion in Preference Consistency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/597160
- The paper
- Lee, L., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2009). In Search of Homo Economicus: Cognitive Noise and the Role of Emotion in Preference Consistency. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/597160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.