The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conspicuous Consumption versus Charitable Behavior in Response to Social Exclusion: A Differential Needs Explanation
Abstract
Social exclusion has been shown to produce a number of different responses. This research examines the proposition that social exclusion may produce either self-focused or prosocial responses, depending on which needs are threatened. Different types of social exclusion threaten different needs, which in turn produce distinct outcomes (differential needs hypothesis). Social exclusion in the form of being implicitly ignored increased conspicuous consumption, whereas being explicitly rejected increased helping and donation behavior. However, when efficacy needs (power, meaningful existence) were bolstered, the effects of being ignored were eliminated, whereas when relational needs (self-esteem) were bolstered, the effects of being rejected were eliminated. The results indicate that certain types of social exclusion produce prosocial responses, whereas others produce self-focused and attention-getting responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis
Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518 · Cited by 2,519
Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845 · Cited by 2,452
Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem.
Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.5 · Cited by 2,378
If you can't join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior.
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1058 · Cited by 1,554
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016984 · Cited by 1,484
Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56 · Cited by 1,271
Cited by
The Compensatory Consumer Behavior Model: How self‐discrepancies drive consumer behavior
Mandel, N., Rucker, D. D., Levav, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.003 · Cited by 564
The Psychology of Competition: A Social Comparison Perspective
Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613504114 · Cited by 520
The effects of religion on consumer behavior: A conceptual framework and research agenda
Mathras, D., Cohen, A. B., Mandel, N., & Mick, D. G. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.08.001 · Cited by 399
Products as Pals: Engaging with Anthropomorphic Products Mitigates the Effects of Social Exclusion
Mourey, J. A., Olson, J. G., & Yoon, C. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx038 · Cited by 226
Zheng, X., Baskin, E., & Peng, S. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.041 · Cited by 139
Perceived control qualifies the effects of threat on prejudice
Greenaway, K. H., Louis, W. R., Hornsey, M. J., & Jones, J. M. (2014) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12049 · Cited by 95
A Little Piece of Me: When Mortality Reminders Lead to Giving to Others
Dunn, L., White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucaa020 · Cited by 69
Wang, X., Wong, Y. D., & Yuen, K. F. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18020404 · Cited by 64
Bharti, M., Suneja, V., & Bharti, M. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111215 · Cited by 44
How power distance belief, self-construal, and relationship norms impact conspicuous consumption
Park, S., Kim, C., & Park, J. (2023) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103518 · Cited by 22
Hou, C., Li, S., Shi, H., & Liu, Z. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1384279 · Cited by 12
Rezaee Vessal, S., & Partouche-Sebban, J. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/jocm-12-2019-0392 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-10-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 530-544
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2102068121
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 19.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
