The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality: Why Cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics
Abstract
In this article I explain why cognitive science (including some neuroscience) matters for normative ethics. First, I describe the dual-process theory of moral judgment and briefly summarize the evidence supporting it. Next I describe related experimental research examining influences on intuitive moral judgment. I then describe two ways in which research along these lines can have implications for ethics. I argue that a deeper understanding of moral psychology favors certain forms of consequentialism over other classes of normative moral theory. I close with some brief remarks concerning the bright future of ethics as an interdisciplinary enterprise.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, in a high-conflict personal dilemma (such as Footbridge problem8), most people would refuse to sacrifice one person to save five (Greene, 2014).”
From Exploring moral algorithm preferences in autonomous vehicle dilemmas: an empirical study (2023) · cites this paper as Greene, 2014
Citations
Cites
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697 · Cited by 5,540
An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062872 · Cited by 4,561
Self-citationThe unbearable automaticity of being
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.462 · Cited by 3,699
(2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511563836 · Cited by 3,602
Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100907 · Cited by 3,089
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958) · Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0031819100037943 · Cited by 2,686
The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027 · Cited by 2,620
Self-citationRethinking feelings: an fMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion
Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S. A., Gross, J. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892902760807212 · Cited by 2,520
Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613 · Cited by 1,747
Thomson, J. J. (1985) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/796133 · Cited by 1,315
Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment
Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004 · Cited by 1,231
Self-citationWhy do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment.
Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284 · Cited by 1,104
The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment
Cushman, F. A., Young, L., & HAUSER, M. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x · Cited by 1,061
Unger, P. (1996) · doi:10.1093/0195108590.001.0001 · Cited by 884
Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x · Cited by 851
The architecture of human kin detection
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05510 · Cited by 748
Separable Neural Components in the Processing of Black and White Faces
Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00760.x · Cited by 703
Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach
Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031021 · Cited by 696
Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Methods and Point
Hare, R. M. (1982) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · doi:10.1093/0198246609.001.0001 · Cited by 674
A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications
HAUSER, M., CUSHMAN, F., YOUNG, L., KANG‐XING JIN, R., & MIKHAIL, J. (2007) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00297.x · Cited by 666
Manipulations of Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgment
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. A. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01731.x · Cited by 642
Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion
Crockett, M. J., Clark, L., Hauser, M. D., & Robbins, T. W. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1009396107 · Cited by 526
Bartels, D. M., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010 · Cited by 521
Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment
Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L. D. J., & Greene, J. D. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x · Cited by 450
Self-citationSelective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex
Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Làdavas, E., & di Pellegrino, G. (2007) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsm001 · Cited by 436
Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making
Bartels, D. M. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001 · Cited by 435
Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. A. (2012) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01438.x · Cited by 405
The neural correlates of moral decision-making in psychopathy
Glenn, A. L., Raine, A., & Schug, R. A. (2008) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2008.104 · Cited by 363
An Investigation of Moral Judgement in Frontotemporal Dementia
Mendez, M. F., Anderson, E., & Shapira, J. S. (2005) · Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology · doi:10.1097/01.wnn.0000191292.17964.bb · Cited by 360
Utilitarian moral judgment in psychopathy
Koenigs, M. R., Kruepke, M., Zeier, J. D., & Newman, J. P. (2011) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsr048 · Cited by 355
Suter, R. S., & Hertwig, R. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.018 · Cited by 341
Simulating murder: The aversion to harmful action.
Cushman, F. A., Gray, K. J., Gaffey, A. E., & Mendes, W. B. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0025071 · Cited by 287
The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience
Berker, S. (2009) · Philosophy & Public Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01164.x · Cited by 277
Shenhav, A., & Greene, J. D. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3390-13.2014 · Cited by 270
Self-citationYou See, the Ends Don’t Justify the Means
Amit, E., & Greene, J. D. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611434965 · Cited by 221
Self-citationThomson, J. J. (2008) · Philosophy & Public Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00144.x · Cited by 218
Divergent effects of different positive emotions on moral judgment
Strohminger, N., Lewis, R. L., & Meyer, D. E. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.012 · Cited by 190
Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure
Cushman, F. A., & Greene, J. D. (2011) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2011.614000 · Cited by 184
Self-citationA Psychophysiological Investigation of Moral Judgment after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage
Moretto, G., Làdavas, E., Mattioli, F., & di Pellegrino, G. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21367 · Cited by 182
Throwing a Bomb on a Person Versus Throwing a Person on a Bomb
Waldmann, M. R., & Dieterich, J. H. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01884.x · Cited by 172
Dirty work, clean hands: The moral psychology of indirect agency
Paharia, N., Kassam, K., Greene, J. D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.002 · Cited by 166
Self-citationThe Preference for Indirect Harm
Royzman, E. B., & Baron, J. (2002) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1019923923537 · Cited by 165
The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment
Kahane, G., Wiech, K., Shackel, N. A., Farias, M., Savulescu, J., & Tracey, I. (2011) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsr005 · Cited by 158
Spontaneous versus Controlled Influences of Stimulus-Based Affect on Choice Behavior
Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2977 · Cited by 156
Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian
Trémolière, B., Neys, W. D., & Bonnefon, J. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.011 · Cited by 147
Increased DLPFC activity during moral decision-making in psychopathy
Glenn, A. L., Raine, A., Schug, R. A., Young, L., & HAUSER, M. D. (2009) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2009.76 · Cited by 138
Moral intuition: Its neural substrates and normative significance
Woodward, J., & Allman, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2007.12.003 · Cited by 132
Methodological Issues in the Neuroscience of Moral Judgement
Kahane, G., & Shackel, N. A. (2010) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01401.x · Cited by 113
Thomas, B. C., Croft, K. E., & Tranel, D. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21591 · Cited by 102
The contact principle and utilitarian moral judgments in young children
Pellizzoni, S., Siegal, M., & Surian, L. (2009) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00851.x · Cited by 93
Neuroscience and Moral Reasoning: A Note on Recent Research
Kamm, F. M. (2009) · Philosophy & Public Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01165.x · Cited by 69
Specificity of meta-emotion effects on moral decision-making.
Koven, N. S. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0025616 · Cited by 62
Cushman, F. A., Murray, D., Gordon-McKeon, S., Wharton, S., & Greene, J. D. (2011) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsr072 · Cited by 62
Self-citationOn the normative significance of experimental moral psychology
Kumar, V., & Campbell, R. (2012) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2012.660140 · Cited by 60
Is Morality an Elegant Machine or a Kludge?
Stich, S. (2006) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/156853706776931349 · Cited by 40
Principles and Intuitions in Ethics: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives
Brink, D. O. (2014) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/675878 · Cited by 33
Any Animal Whatever? Harmful Battery and Its Elements as Building Blocks of Moral Cognition
Mikhail, J. (2014) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/675906 · Cited by 18
Koenigs, M. R., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F. A., HAUSER, M. D., & Damásio, A. R. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06804 · Cited by 6
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Greene Joshua, 2013, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them ðNew York: Penguin Press
- One, what, exactly, is "dual
- Gazzaniga Michael, 2008, Mangun
- Greene Joshua, 2007, Moral Psychology, 3
- Parfit Derek, 2011, On What Matters ðNew York: Oxford University Press
- Foot Phillipa, 1967, Oxford Review, 5, 5
- Wharton Sophie R., 2011, Thou Shalt versus Thou Shalt Not: The Neural Processes Underlying Decisions to Help versus Decisions to Avoid Doing Harm
- Secret Joke of Kant's Soul
- They, counterintuitive
- Musen Jay, 2010, The Moral Psychology of Obligations to Help Those in Need
- Nichols Shaun, 2007, Nos, 41, 663
- Weathers Helen, February 17, 2008.
- For, we do not believe that their behavior will damage them or others psychologically, promote immoral behavior more generally, and so on. One might object that this "no additional reason
- Greene, Secret Joke of Kant's Soul
- John, 2007, Moral Psychology, 2, 303
- rubber bullets
- Nietzsche Friedrich, 1974, The Gay Science ð1882
- Cushman Fiery A., 2011, The Social Psychology of Morality, ed. Mario Mikulincer and Philip R. Shaver ðWashington
- Sidgwick Henry, 1907, The Methods of Ethics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles
Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf2654 · Cited by 1,527
How foreign language shapes moral judgment
Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.02.001 · Cited by 230
Conway, P. J., Goldstein-Greenwood, J., Polacek, D. A., & Greene, J. D. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.018 · Cited by 193
Self-citationThe Foreign Language Effect on Moral Judgment: The Role of Emotions and Norms
Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131529 · Cited by 191
Reduced empathic concern leads to utilitarian moral judgments in trait alexithymia
Patil, I., & Silani, G. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00501 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Greene, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Greene, Joshua D.
- ORCID
- Greene, Joshua D.
- Venue
- Ethics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 695-726
- ISSN
- 0014-1704 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-297X
- OpenAlex
- W1974538016
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 14.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ethics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- cognitive science of morality, neuroscience of morality, dual-process theory, moral judgment, moral psychology, consequentialism, normative ethics, interdisciplinary ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
