CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,113Global trade and economicsGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Import Competition and the Great US Employment Sag of the 2000s

Open access
Acemoglu, Daron, Autor, David, Dorn, David, Hanson, Gordon H., Price, Brendan·2016·Journal of Labor Economics
DOI 10.1086/682384
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Even before the Great Recession, US employment growth was unimpressive. Between 2000 and 2007, the economy gave back the considerable employment gains achieved during the 1990s, with a historic contraction in manufacturing employment being a prime contributor to the slump. We estimate that import competition from China, which surged after 2000, was a major force behind both recent reductions in US manufacturing employment and—through input-output linkages and other general equilibrium channels—weak overall US job growth. Our central estimates suggest job losses from rising Chinese import competition over 1999–2011 in the range of 2.0–2.4 million.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/682384

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 1991, we calculate that US manufacturing employment was 17.0 million
  2. Australia Denmark, 1991, which represent all high-income countries for which we can obtain disaggregated bilateral trade data at the HS level back to
  3. 2014, ð2013
  4. 2000, ð1Þ does not exclude the role of global production chains. During the 1990s and
  5. United States, 2009, imports plus exports divided by GDP fell by a stunning 22% from the first quarter of 2008 to the first quarter of
  6. Quantitatively, 2011, the specification in col. 2 of table 3 implies that had import penetration from China remained unchanged between 1991 and
  7. 2009, we employ the NBER-CES data, which cover a longer time horizon than the CBP data used in our main estimates. A disadvantage is that the NBER-CES database is currently updated only through
  8. make
  9. 2014, ð2013
  10. Balsvik Ragnhild, 2014, Salvanes
  11. Becker Randy, NBER-CES manufacturing industry database. Technical notes
  12. Charles Kerwin Kofi, 2013, Notowidigdo
  13. Eaton Jonathan, Booth School of Business
  14. Houseman Susan N, 2015, Sturgeon, 1
  15. Krueger Alan B, 2002, Solow
  16. 10.1257/aer.100.5.1999 · DOI
  17. Notowidigdo Matthew J, Booth School of Business
  18. Pierce Justin R, Department of Economics

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Acemoglu, D., Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G. H., & Price, B.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Labor Economics
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
2016-01
Volume
34
Issue
S1
Pages
S141-S198
ISSN
  • 0734-306X (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5307
DOI
10.1086/682384
OpenAlex
W2162670720
Cited by
1,113
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 136 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 28
FWCI
198.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Labor Economics (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
import competition, Chinese imports, manufacturing employment, job creation, job loss, input-output linkages, general equilibrium effects, US-China trade, Great Recession

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review