The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EVOLUTION, NUCLEOSYNTHESIS, AND YIELDS OF LOW-MASS ASYMPTOTIC GIANT BRANCH STARS AT DIFFERENT METALLICITIES
Open accessAbstract
The envelope of thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) stars undergoing periodic third dredge-up (TDU) episodes is enriched in both light and heavy elements, the ashes of a complex internal nucleosynthesis involving p , α, and n captures over hundreds of stable and unstable isotopes. In this paper, new models of low-mass AGB stars (2 M ☉ ), with metallicity ranging between Z = 0.0138 (the solar one) and Z = 0.0001, are presented. Main features are (1) a full nuclear network (from H to Bi) coupled to the stellar evolution code, (2) a mass loss–period–luminosity relation, based on available data for long-period variables, and (3) molecular and atomic opacities for C- and/or N-enhanced mixtures, appropriate for the chemical modifications of the envelope caused by the TDU. For each model, a detailed description of the physical and chemical evolutions is presented; moreover, we present a uniform set of yields, comprehensive of all chemical species (from hydrogen to bismuth). The main nucleosynthesis site is the thin 13 C pocket, which forms in the core–envelope transition region after each TDU episode. The formation of this 13 C pocket is the principal by-product of the introduction of a new algorithm, which shapes the velocity profile of convective elements at the inner border of the convective envelope: both the physical grounds and the calibration of the algorithm are discussed in detail. We find that the pockets shrink (in mass) as the star climbs the AGB, so that the first pockets, the largest ones, leave the major imprint on the overall nucleosynthesis. Neutrons are released by the 13 C(α, n ) 16 O reaction during the interpulse phase in radiative conditions, when temperatures within the pockets attain T ∼ 1.0 × 10 8 K, with typical densities of (10 6 –10 7 ) neutrons cm −3 . Exceptions are found, as in the case of the first pocket of the metal-rich models ( Z = 0.0138, Z = 0.006 and Z = 0.003), where the 13 C is only partially burned during the interpulse: the surviving part is ingested in the convective zone generated by the subsequent thermal pulse (TP) and then burned at T ∼ 1.5 × 10 8 K, thus producing larger neutron densities (up to 10 11 neutrons cm −3 ). An additional neutron exposure, caused by the 22 Ne(α, n ) 25 Mg during the TPs, is marginally activated at large Z , but becomes an important nucleosynthesis source at low Z , when most of the 22 Ne is primary. The final surface compositions of the various models reflect the differences in the initial iron-seed content and in the physical structure of AGB stars belonging to different stellar populations. Thus, at large metallicities the nucleosynthesis of light s-elements (Sr, Y, Zr) is favored, whilst, decreasing the iron content, the overproduction of heavy s-elements (Ba, La, Ce, Nd, Sm) and lead becomes progressively more important. At low metallicities ( Z = 0.0001) the main product is lead. The agreement with the observed [hs/ls] index observed in intrinsic C stars at different [Fe/H] is generally good. For the solar metallicity model, we found an interesting overproduction of some radioactive isotopes, like 60 Fe, as a consequence of the anomalous first 13 C pocket. Finally, light elements (C, F, Ne, and Na) are enhanced at any metallicity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The synthetic best-fit λ values are higher than those found for low-mass AGB models that become C-rich (λ ≲ 0.4) unless considerable overshoot is applied.
“the synthetic best fit values for λ are higher than those found for the low-mass AGB models that become C-rich (e.g., λ ≲ 0 . 4 in Figure 20) unless considerable overshoot is applied”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Cristallo et al. 2009
Observed 12C/13C ratios are lower than predicted by standard AGB models.
“In particular the observed 12 C/ 13 C ratios are lower than predicted by standard AGB models (e.g., Forestini & Charbonnel 1997; Cristallo et al. 2009; Karakas 2010).”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Cristallo et al. 2009
During the peak of the burst we find neutron densities as high as 10^15 neutrons cm^-3.
“During the peak of the burst we find neutron densities as high as 10 15 neutrons cm -3 (Cristallo et al. 2009; Campbell et al. 2010; Herwig et al. 2011).”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Cristallo et al. 2009
Constraining convective overshoot from observations provides little insight into the actual physics occurring in convective envelopes.
“While the amount of convective overshoot can be constrained by considering various observations (Herwig 2000; Cristallo et al. 2009; Weiss & Ferguson 2009; Kamath et al. 2012), this provides little insight into the actual physics occurring in convective envelopes, given the numerical differences between the various stellar evolution codes.”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Cristallo et al. 2009
Regime 3 is possibly a common occurrence during the first few thermal pulses for all low-mass AGB stars of ≲2 M⊙, regardless of Z.
“Hence Regime 3, where all or most of the 13 Cis burnt under convective conditions during the next thermal pulse is possibly a common occurrence during the first few thermal pulses for all low-mass AGB stars of ≲ 2 M ⊙ , regardless of Z (see also Cristallo et al. 2009; Lugaro et al. 2012).”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Cristallo et al. 2009
Citations
Cites
Stellar Models and Yields of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Karakas, A., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2007) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as07021 · Cited by 312
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 76
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.161103 · DOI
- Abia, 2001, ApJ, 559, 1117, 10.1086/322383 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20079114 · DOI
- Abia, 2002, ApJ, 579, 817, 10.1086/342924 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00030-5 · DOI
- Arlandini, 1999, ApJ, 525, 886, 10.1086/307938 · DOI
- Beers, 1999, ASP. Conf. Ser., 165, 202
- Bisterzo, 2009, PASA
- Busso, 2001, ApJ, 557, 802, 10.1086/322258 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/175835 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00704092 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-640X(88)90009-5 · DOI
- Chieffi, 2001, ApJ, 554, 1159, 10.1086/321387 · DOI · Paper page
- Chieffi, 1998, ApJ, 502, 737, 10.1086/305921 · DOI
- 10.1086/187884 · DOI
- 10.1002/9783527617647.ch8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-4916(61)90067-7 · DOI
- Cox, 1968, Principles of Stellar Structure
- Cristallo, 2006, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital., 77, 774
- Cristallo, 2007, ApJ, 667, 489, 10.1086/520833 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20053423 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.newar.2006.06.082 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20040289 · DOI
- Ferraro, 2006, ApJ, 642, 225, 10.1086/500803 · DOI
- Forestini, 1992, A&A, 261, 157
- 10.1063/1.2916954 · DOI
- Gallino, 1998, ApJ, 497, 388, 10.1086/305437 · DOI
- Goriely, 2000, A&A, 362, 599
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20040184 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.62.055801 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11428.x · DOI
- Herwig, 2000, A&A, 360, 952
- Herwig, 2004, ApJ, 613, L73, 10.1086/424872 · DOI
- Herwig, 1997, A&A, 324, L81
- Heil, 2008, ApJ, 673, 434, 10.1086/523892 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2916956 · DOI
- Husti, 2009, PASA
- 10.1086/152409 · DOI
- Imbriani, 2006, EPJA, 24, 455
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.202501 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13749.x · DOI
- 10.1086/176141 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:200809363 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:200810576 · DOI
- Lodders, 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220, 10.1086/375492 · DOI
- Lugaro, 2003, ApJ, 586, 1305, 10.1086/367887 · DOI
- Lugaro, 2004, ApJ, 615, 934, 10.1086/424559 · DOI · Paper page
- Lugaro, 1999, ApJ, 527, 369L, 10.1086/308078 · DOI
- Malaney, 1988, MNRAS, 235, 695, 10.1093/mnras/235.3.695 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20020304 · DOI
- Meakin, 2007, ApJ, 667, 448, 10.1086/520318 · DOI · Paper page
- Mowlavi, 1998, A&A, 330, 206
- Nollett, 2003, ApJ, 582, 1036, 10.1086/344817 · DOI · Paper page
- Patronis, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 69, 025803
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20054505 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20065893 · DOI
- 10.1086/148358 · DOI
- 10.1086/190111 · DOI
- 10.1086/164823 · DOI · Paper page
- Straniero, 1997, ApJ, 478, 332, 10.1086/303794 · DOI
- 10.1071/AS03041 · DOI
- 10.1086/187767 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.01.011 · DOI
- Straniero, 2000, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital., 71, 719
- 10.1143/PTP.45.761 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-640X(87)90010-6 · DOI
- Tinsley, 1980, Fundam. Cosm. Phys., 5, 287
- Travaglio, 1999, ApJ, 521, 691, 10.1086/307571 · DOI · Paper page
- Travaglio, 2004, ApJ, 601, 864, 10.1086/380507 · DOI · Paper page
- Travaglio, 2001, ApJ, 549, 346, 10.1086/319087 · DOI
- Ulrich, 1973, Explosive Nucleosynthesis, 139
- 10.1086/173033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.07.015 · DOI
- Weigert, 1966, Z. Astrophys., 64, 395
- Zinner, 2006, ApJ, 650, 320, 10.1086/506957 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.newar.2006.06.045 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735
“2M⊙, regardless of Z (see also Cristallo et al. 2009; Lugaro et al. 2012).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialON THE NEED FOR DEEP-MIXING IN ASYMPTOTIC GIANT BRANCH STARS OF LOW MASS
Busso, M., Palmerini, S., Maiorca, E., Cristallo, S., Straniero, O., Abia, C., Gallino, R., & Cognata, M. L. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/717/1/l47 · Cited by 69
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cristallo, S., Straniero, O., Gallino, R., Piersanti, L., Domínguez, I., & Lederer, M. T.
- Affiliations
- Collurania Teramo Observatory (IT)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2009-04-20
- Volume
- 696
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 797-820
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2064064721
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 13.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
- Austrian Science Fund (P 18171)
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (PRIN 2006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Keywords
- asymptotic giant branch stars, third dredge-up, stellar nucleosynthesis, stellar yields, low-mass stars, metallicity dependence, 13C pocket, 13C(α,n)16O reaction, long-period variable stars, opacity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review