Cited by 433Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesNuclear physics research studiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EVOLUTION, NUCLEOSYNTHESIS, AND YIELDS OF LOW-MASS ASYMPTOTIC GIANT BRANCH STARS AT DIFFERENT METALLICITIES

Open access
Cristallo, S., Straniero, O., Gallino, R., Piersanti, L., Domínguez, I., Lederer, M. T.·2009·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The envelope of thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) stars undergoing periodic third dredge-up (TDU) episodes is enriched in both light and heavy elements, the ashes of a complex internal nucleosynthesis involving p , α, and n captures over hundreds of stable and unstable isotopes. In this paper, new models of low-mass AGB stars (2 M ☉ ), with metallicity ranging between Z = 0.0138 (the solar one) and Z = 0.0001, are presented. Main features are (1) a full nuclear network (from H to Bi) coupled to the stellar evolution code, (2) a mass loss–period–luminosity relation, based on available data for long-period variables, and (3) molecular and atomic opacities for C- and/or N-enhanced mixtures, appropriate for the chemical modifications of the envelope caused by the TDU. For each model, a detailed description of the physical and chemical evolutions is presented; moreover, we present a uniform set of yields, comprehensive of all chemical species (from hydrogen to bismuth). The main nucleosynthesis site is the thin 13 C pocket, which forms in the core–envelope transition region after each TDU episode. The formation of this 13 C pocket is the principal by-product of the introduction of a new algorithm, which shapes the velocity profile of convective elements at the inner border of the convective envelope: both the physical grounds and the calibration of the algorithm are discussed in detail. We find that the pockets shrink (in mass) as the star climbs the AGB, so that the first pockets, the largest ones, leave the major imprint on the overall nucleosynthesis. Neutrons are released by the 13 C(α, n ) 16 O reaction during the interpulse phase in radiative conditions, when temperatures within the pockets attain T ∼ 1.0 × 10 8 K, with typical densities of (10 6 –10 7 ) neutrons cm −3 . Exceptions are found, as in the case of the first pocket of the metal-rich models ( Z = 0.0138, Z = 0.006 and Z = 0.003), where the 13 C is only partially burned during the interpulse: the surviving part is ingested in the convective zone generated by the subsequent thermal pulse (TP) and then burned at T ∼ 1.5 × 10 8 K, thus producing larger neutron densities (up to 10 11 neutrons cm −3 ). An additional neutron exposure, caused by the 22 Ne(α, n ) 25 Mg during the TPs, is marginally activated at large Z , but becomes an important nucleosynthesis source at low Z , when most of the 22 Ne is primary. The final surface compositions of the various models reflect the differences in the initial iron-seed content and in the physical structure of AGB stars belonging to different stellar populations. Thus, at large metallicities the nucleosynthesis of light s-elements (Sr, Y, Zr) is favored, whilst, decreasing the iron content, the overproduction of heavy s-elements (Ba, La, Ce, Nd, Sm) and lead becomes progressively more important. At low metallicities ( Z = 0.0001) the main product is lead. The agreement with the observed [hs/ls] index observed in intrinsic C stars at different [Fe/H] is generally good. For the solar metallicity model, we found an interesting overproduction of some radioactive isotopes, like 60 Fe, as a consequence of the anomalous first 13 C pocket. Finally, light elements (C, F, Ne, and Na) are enhanced at any metallicity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/797

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The synthetic best-fit λ values are higher than those found for low-mass AGB models that become C-rich (λ ≲ 0.4) unless considerable overshoot is applied.

    “the synthetic best fit values for λ are higher than those found for the low-mass AGB models that become C-rich (e.g., λ ≲ 0 . 4 in Figure 20) unless considerable overshoot is applied”
  • Observed 12C/13C ratios are lower than predicted by standard AGB models.

    “In particular the observed 12 C/ 13 C ratios are lower than predicted by standard AGB models (e.g., Forestini & Charbonnel 1997; Cristallo et al. 2009; Karakas 2010).”
  • During the peak of the burst we find neutron densities as high as 10^15 neutrons cm^-3.

    “During the peak of the burst we find neutron densities as high as 10 15 neutrons cm -3 (Cristallo et al. 2009; Campbell et al. 2010; Herwig et al. 2011).”
  • Constraining convective overshoot from observations provides little insight into the actual physics occurring in convective envelopes.

    “While the amount of convective overshoot can be constrained by considering various observations (Herwig 2000; Cristallo et al. 2009; Weiss & Ferguson 2009; Kamath et al. 2012), this provides little insight into the actual physics occurring in convective envelopes, given the numerical differences between the various stellar evolution codes.”
  • Regime 3 is possibly a common occurrence during the first few thermal pulses for all low-mass AGB stars of ≲2 M⊙, regardless of Z.

    “Hence Regime 3, where all or most of the 13 Cis burnt under convective conditions during the next thermal pulse is possibly a common occurrence during the first few thermal pulses for all low-mass AGB stars of ≲ 2 M ⊙ , regardless of Z (see also Cristallo et al. 2009; Lugaro et al. 2012).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.161103 · DOI
  2. Abia, 2001, ApJ, 559, 1117, 10.1086/322383 · DOI
  3. 10.1051/0004-6361:20079114 · DOI
  4. Abia, 2002, ApJ, 579, 817, 10.1086/342924 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00030-5 · DOI
  6. Arlandini, 1999, ApJ, 525, 886, 10.1086/307938 · DOI
  7. Beers, 1999, ASP. Conf. Ser., 165, 202
  8. Bisterzo, 2009, PASA
  9. Busso, 2001, ApJ, 557, 802, 10.1086/322258 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1086/175835 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF00704092 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0092-640X(88)90009-5 · DOI
  13. Chieffi, 2001, ApJ, 554, 1159, 10.1086/321387 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Chieffi, 1998, ApJ, 502, 737, 10.1086/305921 · DOI
  15. 10.1086/187884 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/9783527617647.ch8 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0003-4916(61)90067-7 · DOI
  18. Cox, 1968, Principles of Stellar Structure
  19. Cristallo, 2006, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital., 77, 774
  20. Cristallo, 2007, ApJ, 667, 489, 10.1086/520833 · DOI
  21. 10.1051/0004-6361:20053423 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.newar.2006.06.082 · DOI
  23. 10.1051/0004-6361:20040289 · DOI
  24. Ferraro, 2006, ApJ, 642, 225, 10.1086/500803 · DOI
  25. Forestini, 1992, A&A, 261, 157
  26. 10.1063/1.2916954 · DOI
  27. Gallino, 1998, ApJ, 497, 388, 10.1086/305437 · DOI
  28. Goriely, 2000, A&A, 362, 599
  29. 10.1051/0004-6361:20040184 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevC.62.055801 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11428.x · DOI
  32. Herwig, 2000, A&A, 360, 952
  33. Herwig, 2004, ApJ, 613, L73, 10.1086/424872 · DOI
  34. Herwig, 1997, A&A, 324, L81
  35. Heil, 2008, ApJ, 673, 434, 10.1086/523892 · DOI
  36. 10.1063/1.2916956 · DOI
  37. Husti, 2009, PASA
  38. 10.1086/152409 · DOI
  39. Imbriani, 2006, EPJA, 24, 455
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.202501 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13749.x · DOI
  42. 10.1086/176141 · DOI
  43. 10.1051/0004-6361:200809363 · DOI
  44. 10.1051/0004-6361:200810576 · DOI
  45. Lodders, 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220, 10.1086/375492 · DOI
  46. Lugaro, 2003, ApJ, 586, 1305, 10.1086/367887 · DOI
  47. Lugaro, 2004, ApJ, 615, 934, 10.1086/424559 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Lugaro, 1999, ApJ, 527, 369L, 10.1086/308078 · DOI
  49. Malaney, 1988, MNRAS, 235, 695, 10.1093/mnras/235.3.695 · DOI
  50. 10.1051/0004-6361:20020304 · DOI
  51. Meakin, 2007, ApJ, 667, 448, 10.1086/520318 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Mowlavi, 1998, A&A, 330, 206
  53. Nollett, 2003, ApJ, 582, 1036, 10.1086/344817 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Patronis, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 69, 025803
  55. 10.1051/0004-6361:20054505 · DOI
  56. 10.1051/0004-6361:20065893 · DOI
  57. 10.1086/148358 · DOI
  58. 10.1086/190111 · DOI
  59. 10.1086/164823 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Straniero, 1997, ApJ, 478, 332, 10.1086/303794 · DOI
  61. 10.1071/AS03041 · DOI
  62. 10.1086/187767 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.01.011 · DOI
  64. Straniero, 2000, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital., 71, 719
  65. 10.1143/PTP.45.761 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/0092-640X(87)90010-6 · DOI
  67. Tinsley, 1980, Fundam. Cosm. Phys., 5, 287
  68. Travaglio, 1999, ApJ, 521, 691, 10.1086/307571 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Travaglio, 2004, ApJ, 601, 864, 10.1086/380507 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Travaglio, 2001, ApJ, 549, 346, 10.1086/319087 · DOI
  71. Ulrich, 1973, Explosive Nucleosynthesis, 139
  72. 10.1086/173033 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.07.015 · DOI
  74. Weigert, 1966, Z. Astrophys., 64, 395
  75. Zinner, 2006, ApJ, 650, 320, 10.1086/506957 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.newar.2006.06.045 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cristallo, S., Straniero, O., Gallino, R., Piersanti, L., Domínguez, I., & Lederer, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Collurania Teramo Observatory (IT)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2009-04-20
Volume
696
Issue
1
Pages
797-820
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2064064721
Cited by
433
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 19
FWCI
13.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
  • Austrian Science Fund (P 18171)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (PRIN 2006)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
asymptotic giant branch stars, third dredge-up, stellar nucleosynthesis, stellar yields, low-mass stars, metallicity dependence, 13C pocket, 13C(α,n)16O reaction, long-period variable stars, opacity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review