The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO MEASURING REVERBERATION LAGS IN ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI
Open accessAbstract
Motivated by recent progress in the statistical modeling of quasar variability, we develop a new approach to measuring emission-line reverberation lags to estimate the size of broad-line regions (BLRs) in active galactic nuclei. Assuming that all emission-line light curves are scaled, smoothed, and displaced versions of the continuum, this alternative approach fits the light curves directly using a damped random walk model and aligns them to recover the time lag and its statistical confidence limits. We introduce the mathematical formalism of this approach and demonstrate its ability to cope with some of the problems for traditional methods, such as irregular sampling, correlated errors, and seasonal gaps. We redetermine the lags for 87 emission lines in 31 quasars and reassess the BLR size–luminosity relationship using 60 Hβ lags. We confirm the general results from the traditional cross-correlation methods, with a few exceptions. Our method, however, also supports a broad range of extensions. In particular, it can simultaneously fit multiple lines and continuum light curves which improves the lag estimate for the lines and provides estimates of the error correlations between them. Determining these correlations is of particular importance for interpreting emission-line velocity–delay maps. We can also include parameters for luminosity-dependent lags or line responses. We use this to detect the scaling of the BLR size with continuum luminosity in NGC 5548.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies
Ferrarese, L., & Merritt, D. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312838 · Cited by 4,417
The Demography of Massive Dark Objects in Galaxy Centers
Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Gebhardt, K., Green, R., Grillmair, C., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300353 · Cited by 4,007
A Relationship between Nuclear Black Hole Mass and Galaxy Velocity Dispersion
Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., et al. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312840 · Cited by 3,671
The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation
Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., et al. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/341002 · Cited by 2,617
Inward Bound—The Search for Supermassive Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei
Kormendy, J., & Richstone, D. (1995) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.33.090195.003053 · Cited by 2,544
Kaspi, S., Smith, P. S., Netzer, H., Maoz, D., Jannuzi, B. T., & Giveon, U. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/308704 · Cited by 1,961
Peterson, B. M., Ferrarese, L., Gilbert, K. M., Kaspi, S., Malkan, M. A., Maoz, D., Merritt, D., Netzer, H., Onken, C. A., Pogge, R. W., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/423269 · Cited by 1,802
Self-citation
Cited by
Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., Kochanek, C. S., Stanek, K. Z., De Rosa, G., Mathur, S., Zu, Y., Peterson, B. M., Pogge, R. W., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/48 · Cited by 1,887
Self-citationX-ray reverberation around accreting black holes
Uttley, P., Cackett, E. M., Fabian, A. C., Kara, E., & Wilkins, D. R. (2014) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-014-0072-0 · Cited by 466
The AGN Black Hole Mass Database
Bentz, M. C., & Katz, S. (2015) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/679601 · Cited by 364
IS QUASAR OPTICAL VARIABILITY A DAMPED RANDOM WALK?
Zu, Y., Kochanek, C. S., Kozłowski, S., & Udalski, A. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/106 · Cited by 340
Self-citationFausnaugh, M. M., Denney, K. D., Barth, A. J., Bentz, M. C., Bottorff, M. C., Carini, M. T., Croxall, K. V., Rosa, G. D., Goad, M. R., Horne, K., et al. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/56 · Cited by 311
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zu, Y., Kochanek, C. S., & Peterson, B. M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2011-06-20
- Volume
- 735
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 80
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2109385927
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO MEASURING REVERBERATION LAGS IN ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/735/2/80
- The paper
- Zu, Y., Kochanek, C. S., & Peterson, B. M. (2011). AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO MEASURING REVERBERATION LAGS IN ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/735/2/80
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.